Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reeder v. Succession of Palmer, 623 So. 2d 1268.

57 citing documents.

David Stanley v. Lafayette Police Department La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2026
Co., 95-0654 (La.1/16/96), [cert.
Watson Memorial Spiritual Temple of Christ D/B/A Watson Memorial Teaching Ministries, Charlotte Brancaforte, Elio Brancaforte, Benito Brancaforte, Josephine … La. 2024
S.B., by and Through Her Parents, S.B. and M.B. Versus Jefferson Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
J. Cory Cordova, M.D. v. Lafayette General Health, Inc., University Hospitals & Clinics, Lafayette General Medical Center,inc., and … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
“When a state court is required to determine the preclusive effects of a judgment rendered by a federal court exercising federal question jurisdiction, it is the federal law of res judicata that must be applied.” cert.
Watson Memorial Spiritual Temple of Christ D/B/A Watson Memorial Teaching Ministries, Charlotte Brancaforte, Elio Brancaforte, Benito Brancaforte, Josephine … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 3/21/18), ( (La.
Billye Dickson Johnson v. Natchitoches Community Improvement Foundation, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Cynthia Morales v. Alonzo Wilder; Dr. Stephen McCulloh; Cheryl Smith; Lauren Milton; Karlie Vikowski; Other Unknown Livingston Parish … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Aubrey Alexandra Denton v. St. Landry Bank and Trust Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Armbruster v. Anderson 250 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
" Reeder v. Succession of Palmer , , 1271 (La.
Webb v. Morella 224 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Daniel 177 So. 3d 169 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
Raj v. Louisiana State University 167 So. 3d 1023 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Lyndall Springer v. Nannie O'Neal Senior Apts. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Springer v. Nannie O'Neal Senior Apartments 162 So. 3d 710 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Robert Chastant v. Laura Futral Chastant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 12/12/01); McCollough v. Dauzat, 98-1293 (La.App.
Chastant v. Chastant 138 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Hazel Jones v. the Geo Group, Inc. F/K/A Wackenhut La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
And just like in [ cert.
Jones Ex Rel. Jones v. GEO Group, Inc. 6 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
And just like in [ cert.
Antonio J. Velazquez v. Landcoast Insulation, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Velazquez v. Landcoast Insulation, Inc. 999 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Chevron USA, Inc. v. State 993 So. 2d 187 La. 2008
Maureen Green v. Iberia Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1/16/96), Bobby and Ray Williams P’ship, L.L.P.
Green v. Iberia Parish School Board 945 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Co., 95-0654 (La.1/16/96), ; Bobby and Ray Williams P'ship, L.L.P.
North Amer. Treat. Sys. v. Scottsdale Ins. 943 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Lagnion v. State 858 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Under the federal law of res judicata or claim preclusion, a judgment, once rendered, is the full measure of relief to be accorded between the same parties on the same “claim” or *526 “cause of action.” cert.
Vines v. Northeast Louisiana University 839 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Lycon, Inc. v. Weatherford Artificial Lift Systems 827 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Barnett v. Nichols 824 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 12/12/01) ; McCollough v. Dauzat, 98-1293 (La.App.
Samour v. Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc. 818 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Griffin v. BSFI WESTERN E & P, INC. 812 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
McDonald v. Cason 801 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
McCollough v. Dauzat, 98-1293 (La.App.
Hoover v. Livingston Parish School Bd. 797 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In support of their exception, cert.
O'Brien v. Orleans Parish School Board 769 So. 2d 1218 La. 2000
LeBlanc v. CALLAIS ENTERPRISES PARTNERSHIP 767 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
O'Brien v. Orleans Parish School Board 769 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Relators’ application to the Supreme Court was granted and the case was remanded to this Court with orders for briefing, argument and opinion, cert denied, Reeder v. Succession of Palmer, 510 U.S. 1165 , 114 S.Ct.
Avenal v. State 757 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
O'Brien v. Orleans Parish School Board 753 So. 2d 226 La. 2000
See Reeder v. Succession of Palmer
Johns v. Agrawal 748 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Triche v. Crescent Turnkey & Engineering, LLC 744 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Andrepont v. Andrepont 711 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Arthur v. Zapata Haynie Carp., 95-956 (La.App.
Reeder v. North 701 So. 2d 1291 La. 1997
Williams v. Insurance Co. of North America 692 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
The Supreme Court, cert.
Rochon v. Whitley 691 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Following a hearing on the exception, at which additional evidence was submitted by Rochon, (La.
Stroik v. Ponseti 683 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Sharp v. Johnson Bros. Corp. 687 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
The defendants counter that a state court is required to apply the federal law of res judicata in order to determine the preclusive effects of a judgment rendered by a federal court exercising federal question jurisdiction, cert.
Reeder v. North 683 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
5th Cir.1992) [2] [3] Reeder v. Succession of Palmer, 510 U.S. 1165 , 114 S.Ct.
Ray v. Leatherman 688 So. 2d 1133 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
-72 (La.1993), the Supreme Court of Louisiana stated: When a state court is required to determine the preclusive effects of a judgment rendered by a federal court exercising federal question jurisdiction, it is the federal law of res judicata that must be applied.
Condrey v. Howard 679 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
the judge concluded that Condrey's state court action was barred under applicable federal principles of res judicata.
Benton, Benton & Benton v. LA PUB. FACILITIES AUTH. 672 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Schlesinger v. Herzog 672 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996