Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So. 2d 1257.
-
Dixon v. Travelers Ins. Co.
842 So. 2d 478
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Cone v. National Emergency Services, Inc., 99-0934, p. 8 (La.10/29/99), ( (La.
- Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 844 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-
Ratliff v. STATE EX REL. DOTD
844 So. 2d 926
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
1 Cir. 9/27/02), , writ denied, 2002-2940 (La.2/7/03), , (La.
- Morris v. Flores 840 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
-
Joseph v. City of New Orleans
842 So. 2d 420
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
in which the court articulated it as follows: "the discretion vested in the trier of fact is `great,' and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages."
-
Fremin v. Continental Ins. Co.
839 So. 2d 1137
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
-61 (La.1993) (footnote omitted), where the court explained: this Court commented on appellate review of general damage awards and on the "much discretion" in fixing damages accorded to trial courts by La.
- Williams v. City of Marksville 839 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
-
Cleland v. City of Lake Charles
840 So. 2d 686
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
and was confirmed in Youn v. Maritime Overseas, Corp., cert.
- Sacco v. Allred 845 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Prudential Insurance Co. v. Gideon 845 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-
Entrekin v. Powell
841 So. 2d 845
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Youn v. Mari *846 time Overseas Corp.
- Lavergne v. America's Pizza Company, LLC 838 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- Duzon v. Stallworth 866 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-
Adams v. Chenault
836 So. 2d 1193
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Hae Woo Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 92-3017 (La.9/3/93), , cert.
- Millet v. Evangeline Health Care, Inc. 839 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
- Hughes v. Goodreau 836 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Bassett v. Toys" R" US Delaware, Inc. 836 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- Grayson v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Hospitals 837 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Solito v. Horseshoe Entertainment 834 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- Simmons v. King 833 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- Frazier v. Zapata Protein USA, Inc. 832 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
- Marien v. General Ins. Co. of America 836 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
- Ashmore v. Hilton 834 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
-
Otillio v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc.
836 So. 2d 293
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 92-3017 (La.1993) .
-
Collins v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co.
833 So. 2d 1166
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
cert denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct.
-
Taylor v. Clement
832 So. 2d 1089
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
and was confirmed in Youn v. Maritime Overseas, Corp., cert.
- Hall v. Brookshire Bros., Ltd. 831 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
- Angelle v. Delery 833 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
-
Green v. K-Mart Corp.
834 So. 2d 1084
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
cert denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct.
- Davis v. Witt 831 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
- Nelson v. La. Stadium and Exposition Dist. 832 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- Richard v. Milazzo 831 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-
Wingfield v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development
835 So. 2d 785
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In determining the amount of damages, the discretion vested in the trier of fact is “great.” cert.
- Wingfield v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. 835 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-
Coleman v. Deno
832 So. 2d 1016
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
certiorari denied, sub nom.
- Conner v. Stelly 830 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
-
Miller v. Clout
832 So. 2d 372
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
The standard for an appellate court’s and was confirmed in Youn v. Maritime Overseas, Corp., cert.
- Warren v. Sabine Towing and Transp. Co. 831 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
-
Holtzclaw v. Ochsner Clinic
831 So. 2d 495
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
the court reiterated the longstanding rule that an appellate court is not to decide what it considers an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.
- Williams v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 830 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- Mosing v. Domas 830 So. 2d 967 La. 2002
- Updegraff v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 828 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- Updegraff v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 828 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Molina v. City of New Orleans 830 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- Turner v. Ostrowe 828 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-
Riley v. Maison Orleans II, Inc.
829 So. 2d 479
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
certiorari denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct.
- Street v. Louisiana Pacific Corp. 829 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-
Carey v. Rao
828 So. 2d 53
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
| ifiThe Careys argue that considering the medical records detailing Joseph’s suffering and the testimony of Ruth Carey, it cannot be said that the jury exceeded the vast authority it had in setting damages, cert.
- Courtney v. Williams 826 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Lanasa v. Harrison 828 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002