Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So. 2d 1257.

1628 citing documents.

Millican v. Ponds 762 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Fleming v. American Auto. Ass'n, Inc. 764 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
It is only when the award is, in either direction, beyond that which a
Hunt v. Long 763 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
McPherson v. LAKE AREA MEDICAL CENTER 767 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Ruttley v. Lee 761 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
an appellate court should not disturb an award for general damages unless the trier of fact abused the much discretion accorded *789 to it.
Cooper v. Lacorte 775 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Youn v. Mar *8 itime Overseas Corp.
Russell v. Evans 763 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Vinnett v. Whalen 762 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Sommer v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. DEVELOPMENT 758 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., cert.
Williams v. US Agencies Casualty Ins. Co., Inc. 758 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Irion v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 760 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Cabahug v. Text Shipping Co., Ltd. 760 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Lowery v. Savana 759 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Simon v. American Crescent Elevator Co. 767 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Domonter v. CF Bean Corp. 761 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Thom v. Benson Chevrolet Co. 759 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Boyette v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASSOC. 760 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
George v. Allstate Ins. Co. 758 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Francois v. Alexander 771 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Kose v. Cablevision of Shreveport 755 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Sutton v. Oncale 765 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
In Youn v, Maritime Overseas Corp., the Supreme Court reiterated the long standing rule that an appellate court is not to decide what it considers an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.
Sommer v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 758 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., cert.
Wood v. Subsea International, Inc. 766 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
certiorari denied sub nom.
Straughter v. Ellebnawi 759 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
cert denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct.
James v. Jones 759 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Labouisse v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 757 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Skipper v. Berry 762 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 753 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Strouse v. M & M PROPERTIES 753 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Reichert v. State, Dept. of Transportation and Development, 96-1419 (La.05/20/97), ; Hae Woo Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 92-3017 (La.10/07/93), .
Greene v. Fox Crossing, Inc. 754 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Johnson v. Brookshire Grocery Co., Inc. 754 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Wilson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 754 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Mannina v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 757 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Stevenson v. Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund, 97-709 (La.
Knepper v. Robin 745 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
-61 (La.1993), which explains: In Reck [ [1] ], this court disapproved the appellate court's simply reviewing the medical evidence and then concluding that the award for those injuries was excessive, without taking into consideration the particular effect of the particular injuries on the particular plaintiff.
Morris v. United Services Auto. Ass'n 756 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Kugler v. Tangipahoa Parish School Bd. 752 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Rome v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 751 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
the court reiterated the longstanding rule that an appellate court is not to decide what it considers an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.
Precht v. Case Corp. 756 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Craig v. Hebert 758 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Barrociere v. Batiste 752 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Taylor v. Tulane Medical Center 751 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Dickerson v. Lafferty 750 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Griffin v. Weingarden 752 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Marcum v. Johnston 750 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Bass v. Allstate Ins. Co. 750 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Orea v. Scallan 750 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 751 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In our review of an award of general damages, the initial test, prior to reviewing any other damage awards for purposes of a scale *363 of reference, is whether the award for the particular injuries and their effects under the particular circumstances on the particular injured person is a clear abuse of the “much”, even “vast”, discretion of the trier
Kennedy v. Columbus America Properties 751 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Broussard v. Razden 763 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Cortez v. Zurich Ins. Co. 752 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999