Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So. 2d 1257.

1628 citing documents.

Bostwick v. MAPP Industries, Inc. 707 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
the Louisiana Supreme Court spoke as to the proper role of an appellate court in reviewing an award of general damages, as follows: ...
Jenkins v. Sonat Offshore USA Inc. 705 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Odom v. Johnson 704 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Hoskin v. Plaquemines Parish Government 703 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Nusloch v. Browning-Ferris Services, Inc. 703 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Delome v. Tulane Educational Fund 703 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Riley v. Reliance Ins. Co. 703 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Mindful that in quantum determinations, cert.
Konneker v. Sewerage & Water Bd. 703 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Aycock v. Jenkins Tile Co. 703 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
cert denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct.
Richard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 702 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Wall v. Progressive Barge Line, Inc. 703 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Stegall v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 702 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Haynes v. Calcasieu Medical Transp., Inc. 702 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Baker v. Freeman 702 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard an appellate court must apply when reviewing the award of general damages by a lower court.
Faye v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 702 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Foster v. Destin Trading Corp. 700 So. 2d 199 La. 1997
5 Cir.1992), modified on other grounds Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp., 400 U.S. 494 , 91 S.Ct.
Viator v. Liverpool & London SS Protection and Indem. Ass'n 701 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Miller v. Dupont 702 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Carbon v. Allstate Ins. Co. 701 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Walker v. McCartney 700 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Manuel v. City of Jeanerette 702 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Bellard v. South Cent. Bell Telephone Co. 702 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Ruiz v. Oniate 697 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Rivera v. United Gas Pipeline Co. 697 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
-61 (La.1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court spoke as to the proper role of an appellate court in reviewing an award of general damages, as follows: [T]he role of an appellate court in reviewing general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discr
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc. 698 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
On the basis of Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 92-3017 (La.10/7/93) , we are not persuaded that this argument has merit.
Fontana v. LA. SHERIFFS'AUTO. RISK 697 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Futch v. Attwood 698 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Pellerin v. Humedicenters, Inc. 696 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Coscino v. Wolfley 696 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Garza v. Fontenot 696 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Warner v. City of New Orleans 694 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Southern v. Lyons 696 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Morehead v. Ford Motor Co. 694 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
5 Cir. 1/15/97) , ; (La.
Myers v. Broussard 696 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Dixon v. Tillman 694 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Phiratsamy v. Pipes, 27,209 (La.
Gladney v. May 697 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Medice v. Delchamps, Inc. 694 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Riser v. Acadiana Limousine Service 693 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Cagnolatti v. Hightower 692 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Dauzat v. Canal Ins. Co. 692 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Tubre v. STATE, DOTD 693 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
cert denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct.
Marie v. John Deere Ins. Co. 691 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Bennett v. Stribling 694 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Barillas v. Carrion 692 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
the Supreme Court explained at 1261: the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
Rodriguez v. Julius 694 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Howell v. American Cas. Co. of Reading 691 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Rao v. Towers Partners, LLC 688 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
have to do with the appellate court's review of facts.
Whitt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 690 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
The Louisiana Supreme Court, cert.
Meche v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 692 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
However, -61 (La.1993); cert.
Trahan v. Savage Industries, Inc. 692 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
-1261 (La.1993), where the court explained: (La.