Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So. 2d 1257.

1628 citing documents.

McBride v. Lichtenstein 260 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/17/00), , 74 (quoting Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , , 1260 (La.
Ponseti v. Touro Infirmary 259 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , , 1260 (La.
Lanie Farms, Inc. v. Cleco Power, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Lanie Farms, Inc. v. Cleco Power, LLC 259 So. 3d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Co. , , 1340 (La.1993) ); Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , , 1261 (La.1993) ; Reck v. Stevens , , 501 (La.1979).
LeBlanc v. City of Abbeville 259 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Hae WooYoun v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , 92-3017 (La.9/3/93), , cert.
Matthew A. Hillman v. Corey Seneca La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
In reviewing the propriety of the trial court’s award of general damages we recognize that we are constrained to accord great deference to the trial court’s determination of general damages: In considering whether an award of general damages is excessive or inadequate, cert.
Hillman v. Seneca 258 So. 3d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In reviewing the propriety of the trial court's award of general damages we recognize that we are constrained to accord great deference to the trial court's determination of general damages: *102 In considering whether an award of general damages is excessive or inadequate, , 1261 (La.1993), cert.
Spann v. Gerry Lane Enters., Inc. 256 So. 3d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Having found that JNOV was properly granted as to the general damages awarded, we must now review the trial court's assessment of damages using the well-recognized standards of review as enunciated by the Supreme Court in Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , , 1261 (La.
Latulippe v. Braun 253 So. 3d 820 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
( See also, Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , , 1260 (La.
Linda Mouton v. Aaa Cooper Transportation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
In considering whether an award of general damages is excessive or inadequate, cert.
Mouton v. AAA Cooper Transp. 251 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In considering whether an award of general damages is excessive or inadequate, we are guided by the decision in Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , , 1261 (La.1993), cert.
Mosbey v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office 250 So. 3d 1110 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , , 1260 (La.
Woods v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, L.L.C. 251 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
( See also , Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , , 1260 (La.
Antley v. Rodgers 251 So. 3d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
art. 2324.1 ; Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , (La.
Toussaint v. Baton Rouge Gen. Med. Ctr. 251 So. 3d 1151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Shephard v. AIX Energy, Inc. 249 So. 3d 194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Hae Woo Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , (La.
Christina Mink Dauzat v. State Farm Mutual Automobile ins.co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
findings on the amount of general damages is reviewed for abuse of discretion and “[i]t is only when the award is, in either direction, beyond that which a reasonable trier of fact could assess for the effects of the particular injury to the particular plaintiff under the particular circumstances that the appellate court should increase or reduce the award.” cert.
Alvin Pete v. State of Louisiana, Department of Corrections La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Pete v. State 247 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Duet v. Landry 250 So. 3d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Earl McCarthy, Sr. v. City of Opelousas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Arc Industries, L.L.C. v. William H. Nungesser La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Jenella E. Ben and Rickie Hairston v. Baldwin & Lyons, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
As such, “the role of an appellate court in reviewing general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.”
Ben v. Baldwin & Lyons, Inc. 241 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Pamelia Elmer Villa, Individually & O/B/O the Minor Child v. Geico Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
cert denied, 510 U.S. 1114, 114 S.Ct.
Villa v. Geico Cas. Ins. Co. 239 So. 3d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , cert denied , 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct.
Rentrop v. Arch Ins. Co. 241 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , , 1261 (La.
Simple Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas Property, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Youn v. 5 Maritime Overseas Corp., cert.
Marguerite Fugler Cardwell v. Oaks Care Center, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Cardwell v. Oaks Care Ctr., LLC 258 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , cert.
Ronald Lee Stutes and Carroll Lynn Stutes v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Ronald Lee Stutes and Carroll Lynn Stutes v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Ronald Lee Stutes, Et Ux. v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Thomas v. Boyd 245 So. 3d 308 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , (La.
Tobice Pritchard v. Geico Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Pritchard v. Geico Ins. Co. 242 So. 3d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
All v. Safeco Insurance Co. 235 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Ron Warren, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Derek Hebert v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company La. 2017
John Kennedy v. Christopher Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
As such, “the role of an appellate court in reviewing general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.” (La.
Kennedy v. Davis 229 So. 3d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
As such, “the role of an appellate court in reviewing general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.” (La.
Jimmy Williams, Sr. v. Placid Oil Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., et al., reh’g denied, 10/7/93.
Williams v. Placid Oil Co. 224 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., et al., reh’g denied, 10/7/93.
Urquhart v. Spencer 224 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Marable v. Empire Truck Sales of Louisiana, LLC 221 So. 3d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Robinette v. Lafon Nursing Facility of the Holy Family 223 So. 3d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
As such, “the role of an appellate court in reviewing general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.” (La.
Waters v. Oliver 223 So. 3d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Aaron v. McGowan Working Partners 223 So. 3d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Romano v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 221 So. 3d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Duncan, 2000-0066, p. 13, 773 So.2d at 682-83 ; (La.
Levy v. Lewis 219 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Quality Environmental Processes, Inc. v. IP Petroleum Co. 219 So. 3d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017