DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., 619 So. 2d 52.

160 citing documents.

  • Adams v. Dependable Source Corp. 961 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Bethley v. City of New Orleans 945 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., (La.
  • Linda Hunter v. Alliance Compressors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    7/1/97), (quoting Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., ).
  • Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. John C. Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Hunter v. Alliance Compressors 934 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), (quoting Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., ).
  • Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Guilbeau 934 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Robert Sepulvado Logging v. Julius Sepulvado La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    7/1/97), the supreme court discussed the purpose of SEB and set forth each party’s burden of proof in an SEB claim as follows: “The purpose of SEBs is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident.” Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Robert Sepulvado Logging, Inc. v. Sepulvado 931 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Angelle Concrete, Inc. v. Jerry Sandifer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Angelle Concrete, Inc. v. Sandifer 930 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 932 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Adrian Broussard v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that we should consider a totality of factors to determine a realistic appraisal of access to employment.
  • Broussard v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 926 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that we should consider a totality of factors to determine a realistic appraisal of access to employment.
  • Poole v. Terrell Musgrove Siding & Gutter 917 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    and Comeaux v. City of Crowley, 01-0032 (La.7/3/01), to support his position that a totality of factors in this case prove that he is permanently and totally disabled.
  • Mosley v. Pennzoil Quaker State 911 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Bordelon v. Cox Communications 905 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., Caparotti v. Shreveport Pirates Football Club, 33,570 (La.App.
  • Metoyer v. Roy O. Martin, Inc. 895 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    [5] Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Peters v. General Motors Corp. 892 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    As noted by the supreme court in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), , quoting Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., the purpose of SEB is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident.
  • Tuckerson v. Holiday Retirement Corp. 892 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • Pamela Metoyer v. Roy O. Martin, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    F AILURE TO A UTHORIZE M EDICAL T REATMENT 5 Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Criticized Johnson v. City of Lake Charles 883 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    As stated in Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., : "It is well established that the workers' compensation act is remedial in nature.
  • Criticized Willard Johnson v. Lake Charles Fire Department La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    As stated in Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., : “It is well established that the workers’ compensation act is remedial in nature.
  • Howard v. HOLYFIELD CONST., INC. 878 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., Caparotti v. Shreveport Pirates Football Club, 33, 570 (La.App.2d Cir.8/23/00), .
  • Lacaze v. Alliance Compressors 870 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Danuta Lacaze v. Alliance Compressors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Paul Thomas, Jr. v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Further, in determining the issues presented on appeal, this court is cognizant of the principals established in Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Thomas v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. 871 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    *1168 Further, in determining the issues presented on appeal, this court is cognizant of the principals established in Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Mitchell v. Winnfield Holding Corp. 861 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Michael W. Mitchell v. Winnfield Holding Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Cooper v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 862 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., (La.
  • Darrell Ranel v. McDonald's La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    7/1/97), -57(quoting Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530, p. 7 (La.
  • Ranel v. McDonald's 858 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840, pp. 8-11 (La.7/1/97), -57 (quoting Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530, p. 7 (La.1/14/94), ; ) (case citations omitted)(alteration in original).
  • Roan v. Apache Chemical Transporters 855 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., Glascock v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 25,677 (La.
  • Lawrence v. United Parcel Service 865 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    However, contrary |flto claimant’s contention, in Comeaux , the supreme court expressly declined to extend to permanent total disability cases the “totality of factors” standard stated in Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., which addressed supplemental earnings benefits.
  • Frazier v. Dollar General 852 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., Caparotti v. Shreveport Pirates Football Club, 33,570 (La.App.2d Cir.8/23/00), .
  • Mack v. Cerro Copper Tube 850 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    23:1221(3)(a); Banks, supra; Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Short v. Allen Johnson Builders, Inc. 847 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc. 96-2840, pp. 8-9 (La.7/1/97), , the supreme court stated as follows: “The purpose of SEBs is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident.” Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Cormier v. Housing Authority of Lafayette 843 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Breaux v. Hoffpauir, 95-2933, p. 4 (La.5/21/96), ; Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., Lester v. Southern Cas.
  • Dufrene v. VIDEO CO-OP, LA. WORKERS'COMP. 843 So. 2d 1066 La. 2003
    Breaux v. Hoffpauir, 95-2933, p. 4 (La.5/21/96), ; Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., Lester v. Southern Cas.
  • Culotta v. AL & W. Moore Trucking Co. 839 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Smith v. JE Merit Constructors, Inc. 835 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., Hurst v. Baker Sand Control, 94-2463, p. 4 (La.App.
  • Miller v. Grand Casino Coushatta 829 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Crowson v. L & D Community Care 817 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • Figueroa v. Hardtner Medical Center 805 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • Marshall v. Louisiana Pacific Corp. 799 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • K-Mart v. Turner 799 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Further, in determining the issues presented on appeal, this court is cognizant of the principals established in Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Lewis v. Casino Magic 796 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Holley v. Tate & Lyle 797 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    NTITLEMENT TO SEB The burdens of proof in an SEB workers’ compensation case were set out by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), , as follows: “The purpose of SEBs is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident.” Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
  • Comeaux v. City of Crowley 793 So. 2d 1215 La. 2001
    Reversing, the court of appeal, relying on this court's decision in Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., found it appropriate to consider a totality of factors, including education, experience and age, reasoning: Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:1221(2) should be interpreted to include a totality of factors when determining whether a claimant is totally and permanently disabled such as access to employment, physi
  • Landry v. Physicians Practice Management 783 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Hebert v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co., Inc., (La.App.