Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., 619 So. 2d 52.

160 citing documents.

Smith v. Gaylord Container Corp. 777 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Atwood v. Ewing Timber, Inc. 774 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Comeaux v. City of Crowley 773 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Our courts do not exist in a vacuum, immune to the realities of the real world.” Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Caparotti v. Shreveport Pirates Football Club 768 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Turner v. Sunbelt Mfg. 763 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Town of Basile v. Clark 769 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
LAW AND ANALYSIS In determining the issues presented on appeal, this court is cognizant of the principles set forth in Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., (La.
Bolton v. Tulane University 755 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
City of Eunice v. Credeur 746 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc. 743 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Bertsch v. South Gateway Tire 738 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Discussion “The purpose of S.E.Bs is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident.” Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Gray v. Premier Staffing 736 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Moreover, as recognized by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., job availability means more than job possibilities.
Bennett v. Rodeway Inn 734 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
DISCUSSION SEB [7“The purpose of SEBs [sic] is to compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity he has lost as a result of his accident.” Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Nelson v. City of Grambling 722 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Parkes v. Prien Pines Nursery 722 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
The purpose of SEB as defined by the supreme court in Banks is to "`compensate the injured employee for the wage earning capacity that he has lost as a result of his accident.'" Banks, 696 So.2d at 556 , (quoting Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., ).
Leger v. Young Broadcasting, Inc. 720 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
See Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., Banks, .
Harrison v. Frank & Janie Seafood Rest. 718 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Benoit v. Frank's Casing Crew 713 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Gilmore v. SGB Const. Services, Inc. 712 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Rareshide v. Mobil Oil Corp. 719 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Banks, 696 So.2d at 556 , citing Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Thibodeaux v. Stamm-Scheele, Inc. 711 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Harris v. Bancroft Bag, Inc. 714 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
(emphasis ours) Daugherty v. Domino's Pizza, 95-1394 (La.5/21/96), ; and cases cited therein.
Kahlden v. Horseshoe Entertainment 709 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Britton v. City of Natchitoches 707 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
See Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp. 704 So. 2d 1161 La. 1997
("Our courts should look to the totality of factors related to a realistic appraisal of access to employment.").
Jones v. Evangeline of Natchitoches, Inc. 704 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
In Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the following: It is well established that the workers’ compensation act is remedial in nature.
Bourgeois v. Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc. 702 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Regarding the general scheme of workers’ compensation law, we note the underlying principle that workers’ compensation law is to be construed liberally in favor of the injured employee in order “to effectuate the humane policies it reflects.” Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet Metal 696 So. 2d 551 La. 1997
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Johnson v. Apeck Const., Inc. 692 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Landry v. City of New Iberia 689 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Backest v. Service Tool Co. 687 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Joyner v. Davison Transport, Inc. 688 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Daugherty, supra .; Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., and cases cited therein.
Livings v. LANGSTON COMPANIES 685 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Our supreme court in Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., (La.
Rapp v. City of New Orleans 681 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., does not support the position despite the following language: It is the employer's burden to establish earning capacity when the employee is not working or earning less than the employee is able to earn as the result of job related disability.
Wilson v. City of Shreveport 682 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., (La.App.
Berry v. Insurance Co. of North America 683 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Lytle v. City of New Orleans 681 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
NOTES [1] In this case, the trial judge, determined that it was the employer's burden to establish earning capacity when, as in this case, the employee is not working or earning less that he was earning at the time of the job-related injury.
Deris v. DHL Airways, Inc. 678 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Additionally, in Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., (La.
Daugherty v. Domino's Pizza 674 So. 2d 947 La. 1996
and cases cited therein.
Breaux v. Hoffpauir 674 So. 2d 234 La. 1996
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Glynn v. City of New Orleans 672 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Fortune v. Charbonnet-Labat Funeral Home 671 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Reed v. Direct Installers 669 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Mullins v. Courtney Equipment 670 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Helaire v. Louisiana School for Math, Science & Arts 664 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Warren v. Progressive Healthcare Providers 664 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Hurst v. Baker Sand Control 671 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Maxie v. Brown Industries, Inc. 657 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.
Hickman v. Allstate Timber Co. 653 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
As recognized by the Supreme Court in Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., job availability means more than job possibilities.
Mitchell v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 653 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc., (La.App.
Guillory v. Interstate Gas Station 653 So. 2d 1152 La. 1995