Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Daigle v. Clemco Industries, 613 So. 2d 619.

20 citing documents.

In Re: Succession of Bettie Martin Catchings La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus David Mayfield La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana, Ex R El. Justin Dale Tureau Vs. La. 2022
Brandi Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital Authority La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
: The courts of this state are not authorized to review otherwise valid contracts to determine whether they conform to judicial notions of “morals, moral conduct and public order.” Schiffman [v. Serv.
Billeaudeau v. Opelousas Gen. Hosp. Auth. 244 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
*44 As stated by Justice Dennis in Daigle v. Clemco Industries , , 624 (La.
Wadick v. General Heating & Air Conditioning, LLC 145 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 2004 applies “when a party to the contract relinquishes future rights of action arising from his or her physical injury.” ().
Hymel v. Eagle, Inc. 7 So. 3d 1249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
4th Cir.1974)], respectfully.
Breaux v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. 717 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
-623 (La.1993), the court stated that the articles on transaction and compromise indicate that parties to a transaction or compromise may settle any difference they may have in the present or in the future that is the subject of a lawsuit or that could result in litigation.
Soloco, Inc. v. Dupree 707 So. 2d 12 La. 1998
Succession of Villarrubia 680 So. 2d 1147 La. 1996
rendered after execution of the release in the Brown case, repudiated prior jurisprudence precluding pre-death releases of wrongful death claims as contra bonos mores.
Angelo & Son, Inc. v. RAPIDS BANK & TRUST CO. 671 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Travelers Ins. Co. v. Joseph 656 So. 2d 1000 La. 1995
"[t]he courts of this state are not authorized to review otherwise valid contracts to determine whether they conform to judicial notions of morals, moral conduct and public order" (citation omitted).
Shell Oil Co. v. Jackson 655 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
The supreme court recently addressed compromise agreements in two opinions: (La.
Chautin v. St. Landry Parish School Board 649 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Succession of Hellmers 637 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
3 Cir.1991), writ granted, judgment affirmed
Barrera v. Ciolino 636 So. 2d 218 La. 1994
McCall v. Cameron Offshore Boats, Inc. 635 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Recently, discussed the law applicable to contracts of compromise as follows: "A transaction or compromise is an agreement between two or more persons, who, for the purpose of preventing or putting an end to a lawsuit, adjust their differences by mutual consent, in the manner which they agree on, and which every
Guillory v. Foster 634 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Brown v. Drillers, Inc. 630 So. 2d 741 La. 1994
[*] The instant case is a
Perault v. Time Ins. Co. 633 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993