DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hoofkin, 596 So. 2d 536.

16 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Alexis Sarrabea La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Sarrabea 157 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    cert, denied, 425 U.S. 997 , 96 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. David F. Pittman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    4th Cir.1991), [writ granted, cause remanded, to consider facial validity of La.R.S.
  • In the Matter of State Ex Rel. Lw 40 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    (per curiam); but see State v. Hatton, 2007-2377, p. 13 (La.7/1/08), (a constitutional challenge may not be considered by an appellate court unless it was properly pleaded and raised in the trial court).
  • State ex rel. L.W. 40 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    (per curiam); but see State v. Hatton, 2007-2377, p. 13 (La.7/1/08), (a constitutional challenge may not be considered by an appellate court unless it was properly pleaded and raised in the trial court).
  • State v. Romero 977 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State ex rel. T.E. 787 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4th Cir.1991), writ denied in part, granted in parí & remanded on other grounds
  • State v. Hodge 781 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4th Cir.1991), writ granted on other grounds
  • State v. Dennis 777 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    [4] Despite Defendant's use of the improper procedural vehicle, however, (La.
  • State v. Stephenson 766 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    however, the supreme court stated that a defendant may attack the facial unconstitutionality of a statute on which a conviction is based, even though the defendant did not raise the issue in the trial court or comply with the contemporaneous objection rule of La.
  • State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Texada 756 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Flores 669 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Ganier 660 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Pollard 640 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    4th Cir.1991), writ denied in part, granted in part & remanded
  • State v. Hookfin 602 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    On remand from the Louisiana Supreme Court, , we are called upon to examine the constitutionality of La.R.S.