Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ross, 623 So. 2d 643.

115 citing documents.

  • State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
    Cross , 93-1189 at 1192, 658 So.2d at 686 ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 at 3-4, 630 So.2d at 1280
  • State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
    State v. Robertson, 1992-2660 p. 3 (La.1/14/94)
  • State v. Pinion 968 So. 2d 131 La. 2007
    ("Prejudice is presumed when a challenge for cause is erroneously denied and all of defendant's peremptory challenges are exhausted.
  • State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
    State v. Robertson, supra at 1280 ; (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul Roberts, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Robertson, 92-2660 at p. 3, 630 So.2d at 1280
  • State v. Roberts 947 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Robertson , 92-2660 at p. 3, 630 So.2d at 1280
  • State v. Wilson 938 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    .2d at 537-38 (error not to disqualify juror who could listen to mitigating evidence but viewed death as the only appropriate penalty, "[o]nce the crime guilt is established."); State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), -84 (error not to grant challenge for juror who would vote automatically for death if the accused were convicted of the double murders charged); (La.
  • State v. Leger 936 So. 2d 108 La. 2006
    State v. Robertson, 1992-2600 p. 3 (La.1/14/94)
  • State v. Roberson 929 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Scott, 04-1312 (La.01/19/06)
  • State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
    Robertson , 92-2660 at p. 3, 630 So.2d at 1280
  • State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
    State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94)
  • State v. Gatti 914 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Higgins 898 So. 2d 1219 La. 2005
    See Jacob at p. 5 , 789 So.2d at 1284 ; State v. Hart, 96-0697, p. 7 (La.3/7/97)
  • State v. Thompson 894 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
  • State v. Jones 884 So. 2d 582 La. 2004
    State v. Jacobs, XXXX-XXXX p. 4 (La.6/29/01), ; see State v. Cross, 93-1189 p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94)
  • State v. Lattin 870 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Turner 859 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Kang 859 So. 2d 649 La. 2003
    State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3-4, (La.1/14/94)
  • State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
    art. 921; see also Ball at p. 7 , 824 So.2d at 1099 (stating that "[a]n erroneous ruling depriving an accused of a peremptory challenge violated his substantial rights and constitutes reversible error."); Jacobs at p. 5 , 789 So.2d at 1284 ; Anthony at p. 22 , 776 So.2d at 391 ; Robertson at p. 3 , 630 So.2d at 1281 & n. 4
  • State v. Gipson 850 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.1995), , citing, State v. Robertson, 630 So.2d at 1278 (La.1994)
  • State v. Tate 851 So. 2d 921 La. 2003
  • State v. Dunn 831 So. 2d 862 La. 2002
  • State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
    Robertson , 92-2660 at 3 4, 630 So.2d at 1280
  • State v. Ledet 792 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Jacobs 789 So. 2d 1280 La. 2001
  • State v. Flowers 782 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Robertson, 630 So.2d at 1281
  • State v. Broaden 780 So. 2d 349 La. 2001
    .2d at 537-38 (error not to disqualify juror who could listen to mitigating evidence but viewed death as the only appropriate penalty, "[o]nce the crime guilt is established."); State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), -84 (error not to grant challenge for juror who would vote automatically for death if the accused were convicted of the double murders charged); (error to deny challenge for juror who felt that the "only penalty" upon conviction of first degree murder was death).
  • State v. Taylor 781 So. 2d 1205 La. 2001
    Robertson , 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94), 630 So.2d at 1280-1281 , (La.
  • State v. Livas 808 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Miller 776 So. 2d 396 La. 2000
    emeditated murder); State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), (death penalty reversed because a juror would not consider a life sentence when the particular case involved a rape and murder); State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), (death penalty reversed because a juror would not consider a life sentence when the particular case involved a double murder); (death penalty reversed because a juror would not consider both sentences, but would vote for the death penalty if the accused was guilty of mur
  • State v. Anthony 776 So. 2d 376 La. 2000
    State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94)
  • State v. Ballard 747 So. 2d 1077 La. 1999
  • State v. Lucky 755 So. 2d 845 La. 1999
    630 So.2d at 1283 ; (juror disqualified who would vote for death in any case of first degree murder).
  • State v. McKnight 739 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Wright 741 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    To prove reversible error occurred, defendant is required to show only: “(1) the erroneous denial of a challenge for cause; and (2) the use of all his peremptory challenges.” Cross, 658 So.2d at 686 ; Robertson
  • State v. Martin 736 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    To prove reversible error occurred, defendant is required to show only “(1) the erroneous denial of a challenge for cause; and (2) the use of all his peremptory challenges.” Cross, 658 So.2d at 686 ; Robertson, 630 So.2d at 1281
  • State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
    State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94)
  • State v. Chester 724 So. 2d 1276 La. 1999
  • State v. Flanagan 724 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Causey 721 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Mr. Causey contends that they were insufficiently rehabilitated for use on the panel
  • State v. Brumfield 737 So. 2d 660 La. 1998
  • State v. Wafer 719 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    1st Cir.1992), reversed on other grounds
  • State v. Ballard 718 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Hart 691 So. 2d 651 La. 1997
    State v. Divers, 94-0756 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), -81 ; -64 (La.1986).
  • State v. Turner 692 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    State v. Cross, 658 So.2d at 686
  • State v. Robinson 684 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95)
  • State v. Roy 681 So. 2d 1230 La. 1996
    Cross , 93-1189 at 7, 658 So.2d at 686 ; Robertson , 92-2660 at 4, 630 So.2d at 1281
  • State v. Allen 682 So. 2d 713 La. 1996
  • State v. Divers 681 So. 2d 320 La. 1996
    -81 (La.1994); State v. Ross, *324 -64 (La.1986).