Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bourque, 622 So. 2d 198.

257 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance L. Sinegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    See State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97)
  • State v. Sinegal 97 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    See State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher H. Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.
  • State v. Joseph 94 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), , cert, denied, 522 U.S. 1150 , 118 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Catrina L. Wallace La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Cross, 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686
  • State v. Wallace 92 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686
  • State of Louisiana v. Rodney Ian Barnes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Kang, 02- 2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93- 2729 (La.7/1/97)
  • State v. Barnes 93 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97)
  • State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
    Cross, 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686
  • State v. Dorsey 74 So. 3d 603 La. 2011
    Blank , 04-0204 at 25, 955 So.2d at 113 (citing State v. Connolly, 96-1680, p. 8 (La.7/1/97); ; -30 (La.1993)).
  • State v. Ward 62 So. 3d 55 La. 2011
    -17 (La.1993); State v. Tuesno, 408 So.2d at 1272-73 ; see also La.Code Evid.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamarcus Dewayne Dorsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Aaron W. Ardoin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Dorsey 58 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Ardoin 58 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Andrews 61 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
  • State v. Smith 47 So. 3d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    These include when a district attorney has a personal interest in the cause which is “in conflict with fair and impartial adminis *557 tration of justice” and when the district attorney has been “employed or consulted in the case as attorney for the defendant before his election or appointment as district attorney.” -17 (La.1993), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the defendant’s burden in a motion to recuse a district at
  • State v. Burton 43 So. 3d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    -See State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
  • State v. Wells 45 So. 3d 577 La. 2010
    A “trial judge’s ruling [on a fact question], based on conclusions of credibility and *581 weight of the testimony, is entitled to great deference and will not be disturbed on |sappeal unless there is no evidence to support the ruling.”
  • State v. Burns 32 So. 3d 261 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Hunt 25 So. 3d 746 La. 2009
  • State v. Bordelon 33 So. 3d 842 La. 2009
  • State v. Robinson 11 So. 3d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    See State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Norris A. Palms La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. D. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. D.T. 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. DT 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
  • State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
    494 , 169 L.Ed.2d 346 (2007) ("In Louisiana, a defendant must use one of his peremptory challenges curatively to remove the juror, thus reducing his remaining peremptory challenges, or waive any complaint on appeal.")(citing State v. Connolly, 96-1680, p. 8 (La.7/1/97), ; -30 (La.1993); (La.
  • State v. King 956 So. 2d 562 La. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Dennis Wayne Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    -17 (La.1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the defendant’s burden in a motion to recuse a district attorney as follows: In a motion to recuse the district attorney, “the defendant bears the burden of showing by a preponderance of the evidence that the district attorney has a
  • State v. Baker 956 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    -17 (La.1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the defendant's burden in a motion to recuse a district attorney as follows: In a motion to recuse the district attorney, "the defendant bears the burden of showing by a preponderance of the evidence that the district attorney has a personal interest in conflict
  • State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
    7/1/97), ; State v. *114 Bourque, -30 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul Roberts, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Cross, 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686
  • State v. Roberts 947 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686
  • State v. Lindsey 948 So. 2d 105 La. 2007
    Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; (La.
  • State v. Leger 936 So. 2d 108 La. 2006
  • State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
    Cross, 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686 ; (La.
  • State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
    See State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; overruled on other grounds *305 by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
  • State v. Bowers 909 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Higgins 898 So. 2d 1219 La. 2005
    See, (a "trial judge's ruling [on a fact question], based on conclusions of credibility and weight of the testimony, is entitled to great deference and will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is no evidence to support the ruling.").
  • State v. Maten 899 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • State v. Elie 899 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • State v. Hensley 900 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [16] State v. Stein, 874 So.2d at 292 (-230 (La.
  • State v. Bonner 895 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    [overruled on other grounds in State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
  • State v. Jones 891 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    art. 712; State v. Strickland, 94-0025, p. 23 (La.11/1/96), ; overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
  • State v. Divers 889 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
    Vaccaro, 411 So.2d at 425
  • State v. Stein 874 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. JTS 865 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004