Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Robertson, 630 So. 2d 1278.
-
State v. Roberts
947 So. 2d 208
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 7 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 4 (La.1/14/94), .
-
State v. Lindsey
948 So. 2d 105
La. 2007
State v. Kang, 02-2812, p. 3 (La.10/21/03), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94), .
-
State of Louisiana v. Lisa Landry Johnson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94)
-
State v. Johnson
941 So. 2d 696
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94), .
-
State v. Wilson
938 So. 2d 1111
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Divers , 94-0756 at pp. 8-13, 681 So.2d at 324-27 ; Maxie , 93-2158 at p. 23, 653 So.2d at 537-38 (error not to disqualify juror who could listen to mitigating evidence but viewed death as the only appropriate penalty, "[o]nce the crime guilt is established."); State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), -84 (error not to grant challenge for juror who would vote automatically for death if the accused were convicted of the double murders charged); (La.
-
State v. Leger
936 So. 2d 108
La. 2006
State v. Robertson, 1992-2600 p. 3 (La.1/14/94)
-
State v. Wright
931 So. 2d 432
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.06/29/05), ; State v. Cross, XXXX-XXXX (La.06/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.01/14/94), .
-
State v. Roberson
929 So. 2d 789
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.01/14/94), .
-
State v. Gustave
934 So. 2d 784
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
See State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), -1281 .
-
Joseph Lionel Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1/14/94), (citations omitted); see also Simms v. Progressive Ins.
-
Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co.
926 So. 2d 693
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 4 (La.1/14/94), (citations omitted); see also Simms v. Progressive Ins.
-
State v. Scott
921 So. 2d 904
La. 2006
State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 7 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 4 (La.1/14/94), .
- Lawrence Menard and Patricia Menard v. Michael R. Holland, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
Menard v. Holland
919 So. 2d 810
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Jones, 03-3542, p. 10 (La.10/19/04), , quoting State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
-
State v. Lindsey
928 So. 2d 541
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), -1281 .
-
State v. Juniors
915 So. 2d 291
La. 2005
State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94)
-
State v. Hopkins
908 So. 2d 1265
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
See also State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), , which addresses the trial court's discretion as follows: A refusal by a trial judge to excuse a prospective juror on the ground he is not impartial is not an abuse of discretion where, after further inquiry or instruction (frequently called "rehabilitation"), the potential juror has demonstrated a willingness
-
State v. Magee
916 So. 2d 191
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), -1281 .
-
State v. Higgins
898 So. 2d 1219
La. 2005
State v. Howard, 98-0064, pp. 7-9 (La.4/23/99), -95 ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, pp. 2-3 (La.1/14/94), -81 .
-
State v. Manning
885 So. 2d 1044
La. 2004
Cross, 658 So.2d at 686-87 ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/24/94), .
-
State v. Jones
884 So. 2d 582
La. 2004
State v. Jacobs, XXXX-XXXX p. 4 (La.6/29/01), ; see State v. Cross, 93-1189 p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94)
-
State of Louisiana v. Levi Joseph Garrick
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95); State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), appeal after remand, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98), cert.
-
State v. Garrick
879 So. 2d 401
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95); ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), , appeal after remand, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98), , cert.
-
State v. Garrick
879 So. 2d 401
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95); ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), , appeal after remand, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98), , cert.
-
State v. Taylor
875 So. 2d 58
La. 2004
See e.g., State v. Ball, 00-2277 (La.1/25/02), ; State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Taylor, 99-1131 (La.1/17/01), ; State v. Anthony, 98-0406 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/4/94), -81 .
-
State v. Robinson
874 So. 2d 66
La. 2004
State v. Robertson, 92-2660, (La.1/14/94) .
-
State v. Lattin
870 So. 2d 509
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.01/14/94), .
-
State v. Eugene
871 So. 2d 584
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
-
State v. Van Sales
867 So. 2d 849
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95); ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94)
-
State v. Harris
868 So. 2d 886
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
-
State v. Bozeman
866 So. 2d 1029
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
-
State v. Hotard
864 So. 2d 748
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
- State of Louisiana v. James R. Skipper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- State v. Skipper 861 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-
State v. Jones
862 So. 2d 266
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
- State v. Turner 859 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
-
State v. Kang
859 So. 2d 649
La. 2003
State *652 v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94), .
-
State v. Carmouche
872 So. 2d 1020
La. 2003
See, e.g., State v. Ball, 00-2277, p. 7 (La.1/25/02), ; State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 4 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Taylor, 99-1131, p. 6 (La.1/17/01), ; State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 22 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, pp. 2-3 (La.1/4/94), -81 .
-
State v. Tate
851 So. 2d 921
La. 2003
State v. Robertson, 92-2660, ; see also Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 , 112 S.Ct.
-
State v. Williams
831 So. 2d 835
La. 2002
State v. Robertson, 92-2660, (La.1/14/94), .
-
State v. Dunn
831 So. 2d 862
La. 2002
State v. Cross , 93-1189, p. 7, 658 So.2d at 686 ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
-
State v. Dangerfield
816 So. 2d 885
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), ; State v. Richardson, 97-1995 (La.App.
-
State v. Huckabay
809 So. 2d 1093
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
See also State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), (a trial judge's ruling on a challenge for cause will be reversed only when a review of the entire voir dire reveals that the trial court abused its discretion).
-
State v. Ball
824 So. 2d 1089
La. 2002
State v. Cross, 93-1189, pp. 6-7 (La.6/30/95), -87 ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
-
State v. Scott
823 So. 2d 960
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
-
State v. Ledet
792 So. 2d 160
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
-
State v. Jacobs
803 So. 2d 933
La. 2001
., State v. Tilley, 99-0569 (La.7/6/00), (defendant killed a sixty-eight-year-old man by repeatedly stabbing him during the course of an armed robbery in the parking lot of a restaurant); State v. Frost, 97-1771 (La.12/1/98), (defendant, a hotel employee, stabbed the night auditor to death and stole the contents of the cash box); State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), (defendant broke into the victims' home, armed himself with a kitchen knife, and stabbed the two elderly victims to death) (co
-
State v. Jacobs
789 So. 2d 1280
La. 2001
[3] In State v. Robertson, 92-2660, pp. 2-3 (La.1/14/94), -81 , we discussed the evolution of Louisiana's well-settled jurisprudential rule that prejudice is presumed when a defendant's challenge for cause is erroneously denied and the defendant exhausts all of his peremptory challenges.
-
State v. Williams
786 So. 2d 203
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), ; State v. *212 Harris, 33,406 (La.App.2d Cir.8/25/00), -37 .
-
State v. Anderson
786 So. 2d 917
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.01/14/94), .