Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Robertson, 630 So. 2d 1278.

204 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Eric Dale Mickelson La. 2014
State v. Dominguez 148 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94), .
State of Louisiana v. Harold Lee Julien, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 7 (La.6/30/95), State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 4 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Julien 139 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 7 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 4 (La.1/14/94), .
State of Louisiana v. Brian Segura La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
1/14/94), appeal after remand, 97-0177 (La.
State v. Segura 127 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95); ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), ; appeal after remand, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98); , cert, denied, 525 U.S. 882 , 119 S.Ct.
State v. Munson 115 So. 3d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“[A] challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.” State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Demarcus W. Law La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
See State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), -80.
State v. Law 110 So. 3d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), -80 .
State of Louisiana v. Brady J. Harrington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Kang, 02-2812, p. 3 (La.10/21/03), State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Harrington 129 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Kang, 02-2812, p. 3 (La.10/21/03), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94), .
State of Louisiana v. Horatio Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95); State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), appeal after remand, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98); cert.
State of Louisiana v. Cleveland Troy Bias La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95); State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), appeal after remand, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98); cert.
State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
Campbell , 06-0286 at 70, 983 So.2d at 856 ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94), .
State of Louisiana v. Terrance L. Sinegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Sinegal 97 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94)
State of Louisiana v. L. W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
See State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), -80.
State of Louisiana v. Catrina L. Wallace La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 7 (La.6/30/95), State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 4 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Wallace 92 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 7 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 4 (La.1/14/94), .
State v. Brown 92 So. 3d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Lattin, 37,917 (La.App.2d Cir.4/7/04), , citing State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
State of Louisiana v. Rodney Ian Barnes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Kang, 02-2812, p. 3 (La.10/21/03), State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Barnes 93 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Kang, 02-2812, p. 3 (La.10/21/03), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94), .
State v. Ruffin 82 So. 3d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
*514 In order “to prove there has been reversible error warranting reversal of the conviction, defendant need show (1) the erroneous denial of a challenge for cause; and (2) the use of all of his peremptory challenges.” State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. *237 Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
State v. Dorsey 74 So. 3d 603 La. 2011
Blank , 04-0204 at 25, 955 So.2d at 113 ; Kang , 02-2812 at 3, 859 So.2d at 651 ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94); .
State v. Sparks 68 So. 3d 435 La. 2011
494 , 169 L.Ed.2d 346 (2007); State v. Lindsey, 06-0255, p. 2 (La.1/17/07), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94), .
State v. Andrews 61 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94)
State of Louisiana v. David G. Sarpy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Jacobs, 1999-1659 p. 4 (La.6/29/01), see State v. Cross, 93-1189 p. 6 (La.6/30/95), State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Sarpy 52 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Jacobs, 1999-1659 p. 4 (La.6/29/01), ; see State v. Cross, 93-1189 p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Burton 43 So. 3d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Constance 25 So. 3d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Holder 25 So. 3d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
“A trial judge’s refusal to excuse a prospective juror for cause is not an abuse of his discretion notwithstanding that the juror has voiced an opinion seemingly prejudicial to the defense, when subsequently, on further inquiry or instruction, he has demonstrated a willingness and ability to decide the case impartially according to the law and evidence.” State v. Robertson, [92-2660 (La.1/14/94), ].
State v. ZANTIZ 24 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Anderson 28 So. 3d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), (Citations omitted).
State v. Williams 22 So. 3d 867 La. 2009
d 162 (defendant shot and killed two people, and injured two people during the course of an armed robbery at a restaurant); State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), (during armed robbery in a restaurant where defendant had previously been an | .^employee, he shot and killed one employee and shot and permanently disabled and paralyzed another); State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), (defendant broke into the victims’ home, armed himself with a kitchen knife, and stabbed the two elderly victims t
State v. Dupas 17 So. 3d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Williams 15 So. 3d 348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94); , cert denied, 525 U.S. 882 , 119 S.Ct.
State v. Robinson 11 So. 3d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Johnson 3 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Is that plain enough?” Johnson maintains that the requirements stated in State v. Robertson, 1992-2660 (La.01/14/94), , (i.e., the erroneous denial of a challenge for cause and the use of all his peremptory challenges) were met and so *705 his conviction should be reversed.
State v. Eason 3 So. 3d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Jones 999 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
In State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), , the Court addressed the trial court's discretion as follows: A refusal by a trial judge to excuse a prospective juror on the ground he is not impartial is not an abuse of discretion where, after further inquiry or instruction (frequently called "rehabilitation"), the potential juror has demonstrated a willingness an
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), -87 ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
Wyatt v. Hendrix 998 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
In State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: A refusal by a trial judge to excuse a prospective juror on the ground he is not impartial is not an abuse of discretion where, after further inquiry or instruction (frequently called "rehabilitation"), the potential juror has demonstrated a willingness and ability to decide the c
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
State v. Robertson, 1992-2660 p. 3 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Lizotte 977 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Montgomery 974 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
State v. Pinion 968 So. 2d 131 La. 2007
See State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), -80 .
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Paul Roberts, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 7 (La.6/30/95), State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 4 (La.1/14/94)