DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Davis 935 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Small 935 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Watson 935 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Thomas 935 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Hano 938 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Mizell 938 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    State v. Baxley, 94-2982 (La.5/22/95), ; (La.
  • State v. Touchet 931 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Touchet, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    “‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State v. Robert 931 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Mays 929 So. 2d 1231 La. 2006
    Principles of res judicata generally do not apply to habitual offender proceedings, and the circumstances of the present case do not justify according finality to the 2003 adjudication and sentence of defendant as a second offender.
  • State v. Williams 932 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that in certain instances a sentence less than the minimum sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law might be permitted.
  • State v. Hall 929 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    that courts have the power to declare a mandatory minimum sentence excessive under Art. I, § 20 of the Louisiana Constitution, this power should only be exercised in rare cases and only when the court is firmly convinced that the minimum sentence is excessive.
  • State v. Hebert 930 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    In his third allegation of error, the defendant alleges that the trial court imposed an excessive sentence and should have imposed a
  • State v. Roberson 929 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Mead 927 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Johnson, supra ; State v. Green, 36,-741 (La.App.
  • State v. Reed 926 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Wynne 926 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Carroll 926 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Morgan 926 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Humphries 927 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Jones 927 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Lewis 926 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Lawrence 925 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Smart 926 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    -1281 (La.1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court specifically held that when a trial court determines the minimum sentence mandated by LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Houston 925 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Moossy 924 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Hargrove 924 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Mahoney 923 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Seals 923 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Solomon 923 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Smith 923 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Traylor 923 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Pitre 924 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2861, 2866 , 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
  • State of Louisiana v. Anthony Craig Pitre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    2861, 2866, 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977); State v. Handy, 96-2505, p. 1 (La.1/6/97)
  • State v. Duplechin 922 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Jefferson 920 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Qualls 921 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Boston 920 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Gayden 920 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Goins 920 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Morris 920 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Price 920 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Jason L. Fomond La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State v. Fomond 921 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    "`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State v. Joseph 921 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ().
  • State v. Moore 920 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Clark 918 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    " `[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Donald Clark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Luke 917 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Jefferson 922 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).