Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.
- State v. Washington 638 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
- State v. Washington 638 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- State v. Richardson 637 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- State v. Guillory 640 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- State v. Washington 639 So. 2d 1158 La. 1994
-
State v. Littleton
635 So. 2d 398
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
In support of this finding
-
State v. Toliver
635 So. 2d 1190
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Subsequently, however, the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled in the Dorthey case, reversing the trial court finding of uneonstitutionality and holding that the habitual offender statute, La.R.S.
-
State v. Bagneris
633 So. 2d 835
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
However, our highest court recognized the responsibility of the trial judge to determine if the minimum punishment mandated by a specific statute is constitutionally excessive as applied to a particular defendant.
-
State v. Krogh
630 So. 2d 284
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the minimum sentence under the habitual offender law may be constitutionally excessive.
-
State v. Gaynard
629 So. 2d 1240
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
and held: [T]he provisions of 15:529.1 do not violate Louisiana’s constitutional separation of powers.
-
State v. Everett
628 So. 2d 148
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
and held: [T]he provisions of 15:529.1 do not violate Louisiana’s constitutional separation of powers.
- State v. Roche 626 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. Dean 625 So. 2d 146 La. 1993
-
State v. Ross
625 So. 2d 284
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Additionally, concluded that the Habitual Offender Statute L.S.A.-R.S.