Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Washington 638 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Washington 638 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Richardson 637 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Guillory 640 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Washington 639 So. 2d 1158 La. 1994
  • State v. Littleton 635 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    In support of this finding
  • State v. Toliver 635 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Subsequently, however, the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled in the Dorthey case, reversing the trial court finding of uneonstitutionality and holding that the habitual offender statute, La.R.S.
  • State v. Bagneris 633 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    However, our highest court recognized the responsibility of the trial judge to determine if the minimum punishment mandated by a specific statute is constitutionally excessive as applied to a particular defendant.
  • State v. Krogh 630 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    However, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the minimum sentence under the habitual offender law may be constitutionally excessive.
  • State v. Gaynard 629 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    and held: [T]he provisions of 15:529.1 do not violate Louisiana’s constitutional separation of powers.
  • State v. Everett 628 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    and held: [T]he provisions of 15:529.1 do not violate Louisiana’s constitutional separation of powers.
  • State v. Roche 626 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Dean 625 So. 2d 146 La. 1993
  • State v. Ross 625 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Additionally, concluded that the Habitual Offender Statute L.S.A.-R.S.