Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.
- State v. Wolfe 761 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Roddy 756 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
-
State v. Brisco
756 So. 2d 644
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Caraway, 28,769 (La.App.2d Cir.10/30/96), , writ denied, 99-2532 (La.02/18/00), .
-
State v. Demease
756 So. 2d 1264
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
However, and imposed a sentence of only 25 years at hard labor without benefit of probation, parole or suspension of sentence, well below the minimum mandatory sentence of 49½ years without benefit mandated for a second felony offender.
- State v. Jetton 756 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
-
State v. Jenkins
759 So. 2d 861
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
4 th Cir. 1/31/96), , writ denied 96-0388 (La.9/13/96), , the *865
-
State v. Bazile
757 So. 2d 851
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Bazile argues that, the trial court should have exercised its judicial discretion in finding that the sentence was unconstitutionally excessive under the circumstances of this case.
- State v. James 754 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
-
State v. Lane
755 So. 2d 368
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Wilkerson, 29,979 (La.App.2d Cir.10/29/97), .
- State v. Thompson 754 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- State v. Norris 754 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- State v. Barrett 756 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
-
State v. Mitchell
753 So. 2d 985
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Caraway, 28,769 (La.App.2d Cir.10/30/96), .
- State v. Ignot 755 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- State v. Tolliver 753 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- State v. Williams 754 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
-
State v. Ballay
757 So. 2d 115
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
ASSIGNMENT NO. 8 Defendant argues that the trial court erred in refusing to allow the defendant a 72
- State v. Armstrong 756 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
-
State v. Burns
750 So. 2d 505
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Wilkerson, 29,979 (La.App.2d Cir.10/29/97), .
- State v. Milton 751 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- State v. Johnson 750 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
-
State v. Anderson
753 So. 2d 321
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
in determining the appropriate sentence.
- State v. Barber 749 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Normandin 750 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Ball 748 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
-
State v. Magee
749 So. 2d 874
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
After a multiple bill hearing, the defendant was adjudicated a was sentenced to serve fifteen years at hard labor.
- State v. Carthan 765 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- State v. Gass 747 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
-
State v. Williams
747 So. 2d 1256
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
which indicated that even a punishment required by statute may constitute excessive punishment if it was a purposeless imposition of pain and suffering and was grossly disproportionate to the severity of the crime.
- State v. Frith 747 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Rose 750 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Herrington 749 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Windham 748 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
-
State v. Russell
750 So. 2d 1074
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
However, he argues that the minimum sentence was constitutionally excessive, and the trial court should have deviated from the statutory minimum, because “he is a relatively young man who can be rehabilitated.” The Louisiana Supreme Court, stated that “[i]t is a well established principle that it is the legislature’s prerogative to determine the length of the sentence imposed for crimes classified as felonies.” State v. Rome, 96-0991 (La.7/1/97), .
-
State v. Fobbs
747 So. 2d 1232
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 3/16/95) , , was limited to sentences imposed under the habitual offender statute, La.Rev.Stat.
-
State v. Martello
748 So. 2d 1192
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.
- State v. Powell 746 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
- State v. Webster 746 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
-
State v. Louis
744 So. 2d 694
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
- State v. Atkins 746 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
- State v. Madison 743 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Thomas 745 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Poland 750 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
-
State v. Carter
746 So. 2d 711
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Const. art. III, § I; State v. Dorthey, [ , ]supra at 1280 [(La.1993)]
-
State v. Davis
745 So. 2d 136
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
On 10 October 1997, the court sentenced the defendant to twelve years at hard labor as a triple offender, which is a departure from the mandatory life sentence in this instance
-
State v. Brown
746 So. 2d 643
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
*652 EXCESSIVE SENTENCE Lastly
-
State v. Mayer
743 So. 2d 304
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
[2] In sentencing the defendant to ten years at hard labor, and deviated below the statutory minimum sentence of twenty years required pursuant to La.
-
State v. Fobbs
744 So. 2d 1274
La. 1999
that "the review of sentencing, including sentencing under R.S.
- State v. Armstrong 743 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Caldwell 742 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999