Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dorthey, 623 So. 2d 1276.

2014 citing documents.

  • State v. Dunn 715 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Webb 715 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Dorsey 718 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Hawkins 715 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Wilkerson, 29,979 (La.
  • State v. Taylor 720 So. 2d 1208 La. 1998
    JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ, being of the opinion that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, .
  • State v. Dunn 713 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Pollard, 93-0660 (La.10/20/94)
  • State v. Hayes 712 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Wilson 714 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Caraway, 28,769 (La.
  • State v. Richards 713 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Francis 715 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    the mandatory life sentence should be deemed excessive considering the circumstances of the offense.
  • State v. Overby 714 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State ex rel. A.A.S. 711 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Splond 712 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Lewis 711 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Jones 709 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    He claims that this is a constitutionally excessive sentence in that is makes “no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment and is nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime,” , (La.1993).
  • State v. Johnson 709 So. 2d 672 La. 1998
    [*] We granted writs of certiorari in this case [1] permits a downward departure from the mandatory minimum sentences in LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Johnson 709 So. 2d 679 La. 1998
    Thus, the court, vacated Johnson's sentence and remanded him to the trial court for re-sentencing.
  • State v. Hunt 707 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    An habitual offender adjudication consists of a “finding” ancillary to the imposition of sentence, not a “conviction.” See, State v. Mayweather, 28,271 (La.App.2d Cir. 06/26/96), .
  • State v. Dunn 708 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Bell 709 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    The defendant argues, however, that his sentence is constitutionally excessive
  • State v. McCorkle 708 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. ¶ 14 Daigle, 96-782 (La.
  • State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Downs 705 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Mandigo 702 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Adger 707 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Johnson 704 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Comanche 705 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Carter 704 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Caraway, 28,769 (La.
  • State v. Jackson 706 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    U COUNSEL’S ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR:
  • State v. Moses 701 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    And one of the problems the court is having is in a case cited as State versus Dorthey, a Supreme Court of Louisiana case, cited at ...
  • State v. Berry 702 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Wilkerson 702 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Winslow 702 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Taylor 701 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    He admitted the allegations of the multiple bill and the court vacated the previous sentence and resentenced Mr. Taylor as a
  • State v. Armstrong 701 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Cormier 702 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Washington 700 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Martin 702 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Gladney 700 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Ignot 701 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    In support of his position, in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held a trial judge has the authority to reduce an offender's sentence below the mandatory minimum whenever the court finds that the sentence makes no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment or that the sentence was the purposeful imposition of pain and
  • State v. Jackson 707 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Lee 699 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    finding the minimum sentence of life imprisonment under the Habitual Offender Law to be unconstitutionally excessive.
  • State v. Rome 696 So. 2d 976 La. 1997
  • State v. Mitchell 697 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Robinson 697 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Foster 697 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Foster 697 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Lacoste 695 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    On April 22, 1997, the trial court found that Lacoste was a to serve ten years at hard labor as a third felony offender under La.
  • State v. Neville 695 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    State v. Pollard, 93-0660, p. 1 (La.10/20/94), ; (La.
  • State v. Langlois 695 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    -79 (La.1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court held: Under Louisiana's Habitual Offender law a bill of information alleging that a defendant is a recidivist does not charge a new crime but merely advises the trial court of circumstances, and seeks enhanced punishment following a defendant's most recent conviction.