DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Nomey, 613 So. 2d 157.

70 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Malik Dangerfield La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Augustine La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
    Stated differently, “a person whose mental condition is such that he lacks the capacity to understand the nature and object of the proceedings against him, to consult with counsel[,] and to assist in preparing his defense may not be subject to trial.” (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joshua A. Chapman La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Victor D. Guillory A/K/A Victory Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    the trial court appointed a sanity commission but failed to conduct a competency hearing prior to accepting the defendant’s guilty plea the day following examination.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Isaiah Doyle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
  • State of Louisiana v. Trevonte Lamarque Talbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
  • State of Louisiana Versus Nicholas Pullen La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
  • State Of Louisiana v. Timothy Lee Elliott La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    2d 1168, 1169 ( per curiam); ( La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Harlow Hutchinson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    a case in which the defendant pled guilty to two counts of solicitation for murder in addition to one count of first-degree murder.
  • State v. Hutchinson 261 So. 3d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    Defendant cites State v. Nomey , a case in which the defendant pled guilty to two counts of solicitation for murder in addition to one count of first-degree murder.
  • State v. Cretian 238 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    At this point, the failure to resolve the issue of a , 161-62 (La.1993), or a nunc pro tunc hearing to determine competency retrospectively under State v. Snyder, 98-1078 (La.
  • State v. Willie 235 So. 3d 1339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Darrin Kashy Duhon -Aka- Darrin Duhon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Duhon 224 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Higgins 198 So. 3d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Johnson 166 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Thomas, 47,020 (La.App.2d Cir.4/11/12), .
  • State v. O'Brien 168 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Harold Lee Julien, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    At this point, the failure to resolve the issue of a defendant’s -62 (La.1993), or a nunc pro tunc hearing to determine competency retrospectively under State v. Snyder, 98-1078 (La.4/14/99)
  • State v. Julien 139 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    At this point, the failure to resolve the issue of a defendant’s -62 (La.1993), or a nunc pro tunc hearing to determine competency retrospectively under State v. Snyder, 98-1078 (La.4/14/99), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Rudolph Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Williams 93 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    citing Drope v. Missouri, *816 420 U.S. 162 , 95 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Renee Tyler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Tyler 89 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Thomas 91 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Whittington 80 So. 3d 723 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
  • State v. Robinson 39 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    the Louisiana Supreme Court found that the appellate court erred in remanding the case for a retroactive sanity hearing.
  • State of Louisiana v. C. C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. C.C. 5 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Price 2 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
    State v. Nomey, 92-1631 (La.1/19/93), , ( (La.
  • State v. Gibson 993 So. 2d 1193 La. 2008
    Thus, the present record, as corrected by Judge Derbigny, affords substantial assurances that before bringing him to trial on the assault charge, the state accorded defendant his due process right to "`adequate anticipatory, protective procedures to minimize the risk that an incompetent person will be convicted.'" (quoting Medina v. California, 505 U.S. 437, 458 , 112 S.Ct.
  • State v. Camper 996 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Seals v. State, 2000-2738 (La.10/25/02), , (La.
  • State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
    at 2584 , 120 L.Ed.2d at 371 (1992) (Blackmun, J. dissenting) (emphasis in original); see also State v. Martin, 00-0489, p. 1 (La.9/22/00), (per curiam)
  • State v. Gibson 975 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    The Louisiana Supreme Court stated in State ex rel Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02); , that "[t]he failure to resolve the issue of a , (La.1993), or a nunc pro tunc hearing to determine competency retrospectively under State v. Snyder, 98-1078 (La.4/14/99), ."
  • State v. Strain 972 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Dupree 950 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Rankin 938 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Turner 936 So. 2d 89 La. 2006
    1774 , 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964)
  • State v. Lee 930 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02)
  • State v. Ford 930 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    | ^Louisiana's statutory scheme for detecting mental incapacity “jealously guards a defendant’s right to a fair trial.” State v. Nomey, 92-1631 (La.1/19/93), ().
  • State v. Juniors 918 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    At this point, the failure to resolve the issue of a -62 (La.1993), or a nunc pro tunc hearing to determine competency retrospectively under State v. Snyder, 98-1078 (La.4/14/99), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Glynn Juniors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    At this point, the failure to resolve the issue of a defendant’s -62 (La.1993), or a nunc pro tunc hearing to determine competency retrospectively under State v. Snyder, 98-1078 (La.4/14/99)
  • State v. Snyder 874 So. 2d 739 La. 2004
    State v. Nomey, 92-1631 (La.1/19/93) .
  • State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
    at 2584 , 120 L.Ed.2d at 371 (1992) (Blackmun, J. dissenting) (emphasis in original); see also State v. Martin, 00-0489, p. 1 (La.9/22/00), (per curiam)
  • State v. Lee 852 So. 2d 987 La. 2003
    On the basis of its factual findings, the court is then to rule on the question of whether the defendant is entitled to set aside his convictions and sentences under this Court's decisions in State v. Seals, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02)
  • State v. Orange 845 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Lee 834 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State Ex Rel. Seals v. State 831 So. 2d 828 La. 2002
    The district court conducted hearings on the Nomey claim and held the other claims in abeyance pending a final disposition
  • State v. Carter 814 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    2nd Cir.10/13/95), La.C.Cr.P.