DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tucker, 626 So. 2d 720.

70 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Ethan M. Doyle La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
    2d 707, 712-13 (La.), opinion reinstated on reh’g, (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Clay Landis Riggs La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
    2d 707, 712-13 (La.), opinion reinstated on reh’g, (La.
  • State v. Cureaux 116 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See also State v. Britton, 93-1990 (La.1/27/94), ; opinion reaffirmed and reinstated on rehearing by State v. Williams, 2007-0700 (La.App.
  • State ex rel. J.T. 94 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In support, opinion reaffirmed and reinstated on rehearing by for the proposition that when a suspect flees from an officer under circumstances under which his actual detention is not “virtually certain” to occur, 11 any items discarded (abandoned) can be used as evidence.
  • State v. Smith 948 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Accordingly, the defendant argues that the evidence *247 was illegally seized as the result of an “imminent actual stop.” opinion reinstated on reh’g, (1993) an actual stop or seizure for [.-¡constitutional purposes occurs when an individual submits to a police show of authority or when he is physically contacted by the police, ie, police come upon an individual with such force that, regardless of the individual’s attempts to flee or elude the encounter, an actual s
  • State v. Handy 925 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    opinion reinstated on rehearing by
  • State v. Pulliam 920 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    1993), affirmed on rehearing, the defendant was observed by police officers standing in front of a business establishment in a neighborhood that was the target of a drug sweep.
  • State v. Massey 866 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Accord, opinion reinstated on reh'g
  • State v. Holloway 847 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    opinion reaffirmed and reinstated on rehearing by State v. Dobard, 2001-2629 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Wilson 839 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    opinion reinstated on reh'g
  • State v. Cooper 830 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    App. 2d Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.
  • State v. Handy 828 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    1/27/94), ; opinion reaffirmed and reinstated on rehearing by State v. Allen , XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
  • State v. Fairley 822 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    1993), opinion reinstated on reh'g, (1993).
  • State v. Nelson 822 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    The Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the Hodari D definition of an ` opinion reinstated on reh'g
  • State v. Young 820 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Lawrence 817 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Allen 792 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See also State v. Britton, 93-1990 (La.1/27/94), ; opinion reaffirmed and reinstated on rehearing by State v. Dennis, 98-1016 (La.App.
  • State v. Givens 785 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98)
  • State v. Harris 786 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    The Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the Hodari D definition of an ` opinion reinstated on reh'g
  • State v. Williams 782 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    See also State v. Britton, 93-1990 (La.1/27/94), ; opinion reaffirmed and reinstated on rehearing by State v. Dennis, 98-1016 (La.App.
  • State v. Burke 782 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)
  • State v. Washington 778 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See also State v. Britton, 93-1990 (La.1/27/94), ; opinion reaffirmed and reinstated on rehearing by State v. Dennis, 98-1016 (La.App.
  • State v. Boson 778 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Muse 772 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    opinion reaffirmed and reinstated on rehearing by
  • State v. Bacuetes 772 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    opinion adhered to on rehearing, (1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the Hodari D. definition of “actual stop,” holding that an actual stop of a person occurs only when he submits to a show of police authority or is physically contacted by the police.
  • State v. Lewis 772 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Watson 774 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    1993), opinion adhered to on rehearing, (1993), the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the Hodari D. definition of "actual stop," holding that an actual stop of a person occurs only when he submits to a show of police authority or is physically contacted by the police.
  • State v. Brown 773 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    2 Cir. 1992), affirmed, in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Press 767 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    opinion reinstated on rehearing by
  • State v. Snavely 759 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    The Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the Hodari D. definition of an "actual stop" opinion reinstated on reh'g
  • State v. Patterson 758 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Samuel 746 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    See also, State v. Britton, 93-1990 (La.1/27/94), ; opinion reaffirmed and reinstated on rehearing, State v. Laird, 95-1082 (La.App.
  • State v. Dennis 753 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    opinion reinstated on rehearing
  • State v. Harris 744 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    2 Cir. 1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.
  • State v. Hill 743 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Creecy 742 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Gray 738 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    NOTES [1] The test for determining whether an "actual stop" is "imminent" opinion reinstated on reh'g
  • State v. Brown 733 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    See also State v. Britton, 93-1990 (La.1/27/94), ; opinion reaffirmed and reinstated on rehearing by State v. Laird, 95-1082 (La.App.
  • State v. Cook 733 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Poche 733 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    2 Cir.1992), *733 affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Ewens 735 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    opinion reinstated on rehearing
  • State v. Dappemont 734 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Willis 728 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    App. 2d Cir. 1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.
  • State v. Sheehan 740 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Bradford 729 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    See also, State v. Britton, 93-1990 (La.1/27/94), ; opinion reaffirmed and reinstated on rehearing, (La.
  • State v. Bentley 728 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    opinion reinstated on rehearing by
  • State v. Neal 719 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    opinion reaffirmed and reinstated on rehearing by our Supreme Court held inter alia that an “imminent actual stop” occurs when the police come upon an individual with such force that, regardless of the individual’s attempts to flee or elude the encounter, an actual stop of the individual is virtually certain.
  • State v. Riggins 718 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    In support of their argument, opinion reinstated on rehearing
  • State v. Jones 720 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
  • State v. Dillon 719 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    2 Cir.1992), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.