Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 630 So. 2d 741.

198 citing documents.

Gaubert v. Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc. 770 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Brown v. Drillers, 93-1019, p. 7 (La.1/14/94), .
White v. General Motors Corp. 775 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Rogers v. Horseshoe Entertainment 766 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), ; (La.App.
Bartlett Const. Co. Inc. v. St. Bernard Council 763 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Anthony v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 759 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Article 3073; Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94); .
Doiron v. La. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. 753 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
1st Cir.5/5/95), ; see Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), -757 .
Sea Trek, Inc. v. Sunderland Marine Mut. Ins. 757 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
[12] Ducote v. Koch Pipeline Co., L.P., 98-C-0942, (La.1/20/99) ; Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94); .
Soloco, Inc. v. Dupree 758 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
See Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94); .
Hoover v. Boucvalt 747 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
1997); Brown v. Drillers, Inc.
Sweet v. IBERIA PARISH SCHOOL BD. 746 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019, p. 5 (La.1/14/94); .
In Re Tutorship of Witt 747 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), ; Nelams v. Allen's TV Cable, 95-444 (La.App.
Kennard v. Kennard 747 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Civ.Code art. 2046; Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94); .
Medicus v. Scott 744 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Brown v. Drillers Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), ; Rivett v. State Farm Fire & Cas.
Walls v. American Optical Corp. 740 So. 2d 1262 La. 1999
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), , the court below concluded that the wrongful death claim of the relatives of Mr. Walls did not arise until March 17, 1995, the date he died, long after the October 1, 1976 effective date of the amendment to La.
Dumas v. Angus Chemical Co. 742 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Brown v. Drillers Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Industrial Roofing v. Jc Dellinger Mem. 751 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-CC-1019 (La.1/14/94), ; Crigler v. Crigler, 28,085 (La.App.2d Cir.4/3/96), .
Nicholas v. Allstate Ins. Co. 739 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), ; NAB Natural Resources v. Willamette Industries, Inc., 28,555 (La.App.2d Cir.8/21/96), .
Peterson v. Schimek 729 So. 2d 1024 La. 1999
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Ducote v. Koch Pipeline Co., LP 730 So. 2d 432 La. 1999
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94); .
Chabaud v. Sylvester 728 So. 2d 851 La. 1999
Moreover, we agree with Judge Cannella's dissent in that under our decision in Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), an inquiry outside the four corners of the settlement agreement into the parties true intent is required in this case.
Cochennic v. City of New Orleans ex rel. Mosquito Control Unit of the Health Department of New Orleans 722 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Chabaud v. Sylvester 722 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Breaux v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. 717 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Plaintiff argues that under Brown v. Drillers, Inc., a compromise agreement extends only to those matters that the parties expressly intended to settle and the scope of the transaction cannot be extended by implication.
Farmers Cotton Co., Inc. v. Savage 714 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.01/14/94), .
Atwell v. National Safety Consultants, Inc. 713 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94); ; Nelams v. Allen's TV Cable, 95-444 (La.App.
Smith v. Walker 708 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019, p. 5-6 (La.1/14/94), .
Barbe v. AA Harmon & Co. 705 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.01/14/94), .
Walls v. American Optical Corp. 703 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Later, in Brown v. Drillers, Inc., the Supreme Court stated: The tort victim's personal injury action arises simultaneously with the claimed tortious occurrence and compensates for those injuries which are peculiar and personal to the tort victim.
Kelly v. Owens 698 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Brown v. Drillers, 93-1019 (La.01/14/94), .
Brignac v. Brignac 698 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94); .
Harrison v. Smith 694 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., , (La.1994).
Ortego v. STATE, DOTD 689 So. 2d 1358 La. 1997
art. 3071; see Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94); , 747 n. 8.
Davis v. Home Depot 690 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., (La.App.
Reeves v. Louisiana State Probation & Parole 684 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94); .
Succession of Villarrubia 680 So. 2d 1147 La. 1996
The case of Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94); , involved a similar issuewhether a general release instrument executed by a wife barred her claim for the wrongful death of her husband that arose after execution of the release.
NAB Nat. Resources v. Willamette Industries, Inc. 679 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Fox v. National Gypsum, Inc. 673 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
Ortego v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 673 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Couvillion v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. 672 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Peyton Place, Condominium Ass'n v. Guastella 668 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
PEYTON PLACE, CONDO. ASS'N, INC. v. Guastella 668 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Nelams v. Allen's TV Cable 664 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94); .
National Tea Co. v. Plymouth Rubber Co. 663 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Prevost v. Jobbers Oil Transport Co. 665 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Fleming Irr., Inc. v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Co. 661 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
EM Nominee Partnership Co. v. Arkla Energy Resources 656 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
the supreme court discussed the application of LSA-C.C.
Shell Oil Co. v. Jackson 655 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Kozina v. Zeagler 646 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
In Brown v. Drillers, Inc., the court discussed the interpretation of compromises, and held that, as in the case of any other contract, reference to La.Civ.Code, Art. 2046, is proper.