DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 630 So. 2d 741.

198 citing documents.

  • Roberson v. DJD, Inc. 933 So. 2d 795 La. 2006
    See Brown v. Drillers Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Scott v. Red River Waterway Commission 926 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • White v. Robinson Lumber Co. 929 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    In Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), , a deceased worker’s widow brought a wrongful death faction on her own behalf and on the behalf of her minor child.
  • Drapcho v. Drapcho 928 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • John David Moore v. Estelle Martin Moore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    1/14/94), the supreme court discussed the effect of a transaction and compromise as follows: LSA-C.C.
  • Moore v. Moore 920 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    In Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019, pp. 5-6 (La.1/14/94), , the supreme court discussed the effect of a transaction and compromise as follows: LSA-C.C.
  • Hamsa v. Hamsa 919 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Brown v. Drillers, 93-1019 (La.01/14/94), .
  • Guidry v. One Source Facility Services 901 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    and Development, 96-1322 (La.02/25/97), ; Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.01/14/94), .
  • Alonzo v. State & Department of Natural Resources 900 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Trahan v. COCO COLA BOTTLING CO. UNITED 894 So. 2d 1096 La. 2005
    See Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019, p. 6 n. 8 (La.1/14/94), , 747 n. 8.
  • Carrie v. LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. 900 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Ferrell Lavergne v. Quality Fabricators of Eunice, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Lavergne v. Quality Fabricators of Eunice, Inc. 888 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Louisiana Civil Code Article 3073 further provides that a compromise extends only “to those matters that the parties expressly intended to settle and that the scope of the transaction cannot be extended by implication.” Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019, p. 7 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Cason v. Cason 886 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Brown v. Drillers, 93-1019 (La.01/14/94), .
  • Terrebonne Parish School Bd. v. Castex 878 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    (citing Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), ; (La.App.
  • Randall v. Martin 868 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Brown v. Drillers Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 864 So. 2d 117 La. 2004
    See also Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), , 744 n. 1 (remarking about a 1980 claim for loss of consortium that "[a] right to claim damages for loss of consortium was not recognized until a 1982 amendment to [La.
  • Lucille Bouy v. Teche Electric La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Bouy v. Teche Elec. 861 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    [2] See Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Browning v. West Calcasieu Cameron Hosp. 865 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Billy A. Browning v. West Calcasieu Cameron Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Richardson v. Richardson 859 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019, p. 6 (La.1/14/94), .
  • FIVE N COMPANY LLC v. Stewart 850 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Brown v. Drillers, 93-1019, p. 6 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Corbello v. Iowa Production 850 So. 2d 686 La. 2003
    (citing Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), ; (La.App.
  • Wiley v. Rapides Regional Medical Center 847 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019, pp. 7-9 (La.1/14/94), -49 (citations omitted) (footnotes omitted), the supreme court reviewed the law pertaining to the interpretation of a disputed compromise as follows: Shifting back to the codal provisions, LSA-C.C.
  • Ryland v. ST. MARY'S TRAINING SCHOOL 843 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019, p. 7 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Kennedy v. Kennedy 840 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Reviewing our law pertaining to the interpretation of a disputed compromise, the Louisiana Supreme Court, in Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), , stated: ...
  • Lay v. Holi Temporary Services 845 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94) , 747 n. 9.
  • Distinguished Schultz v. Hill 840 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    We distinguish the cases cited by defendant in this respect, particularly Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), , which dealt with a transaction/compromise agreement and an attempt to vary from the plain language of that document on a claim that the intended scope of the release was less than it appeared from the language therein.
  • Lee v. Ken Burnham Chevrolet/Oldsmobile 837 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    DISCUSSION Res Judicata The general rule announced by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Brown v. Drillers Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), is that | ¡.settlement agreements are to be strictly construed with a presumption against res judicata.
  • White v. General Motors Corp. 835 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Harris v. Caddo Parish School Bd. 833 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    and Development, 96-1322 (La.02/25/97), ; Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.01/14/94), ; Rivett v. State Farm Fire and Cas.
  • MOBILE EXPLORATION v. Certain Underwriters 837 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019, p. 9 (La.1/14/94), -750 .
  • Bernard v. Iberia Bank 832 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Thompson v. Jackson Parish Police Jury 830 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Covington v. Ace Transportation, Inc. 830 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Peterson v. Schimek, 98-1712 (La.3/2/99), ; Brown v. Drillers Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Richard A. Tonry, P.L.C. ex rel. Tonry v. Constitution State Service, L.L.C. 822 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Thus, the general rule which applies to contracts is that extrinsic evidence is admissible only “when the terms of a written contract are susceptible to more than one interpretation, or there is uncertainty or ambiguity as to its provisions, or the intent of the parties cannot be ascertained from the language employed.” Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Childs v. Woods 822 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019, p. 6 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Campbell v. Melton 817 So. 2d 69 La. 2002
    Civ.Code art. 2276); Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), ; Dixie Campers, Rudman v. Dupuis, 206 La.
  • Tunstall v. Stierwald 809 So. 2d 916 La. 2002
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Dimitri v. Dimitri 809 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Henderson v. Sellers 815 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019, p. 9 (La.1/14/94); -50 .
  • Aufrichtig v. Aufrichtig 796 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Brown v. Drillers, 93-1019 (La.01/14/94), .
  • Townsend v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 793 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Peterson v. Schimek, 98-1712 (La.3/02/99), ; Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Sea-Lar Management, Inc. 787 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Sea-Lar argues that extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to explain or contradict the terms of the written release ( Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), ), but in this case there is no evidence, extrinsic or otherwise, as we have already noted, that would limit the clear language granting a total release from everything asserted in, or which could have been asserted in, this litigation.
  • Shoreline Gas, Inc. v. Grace Resources, Inc. 786 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), ; (La.App.
  • Becnel v. Alexander 783 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Peterson v. Schimek, 98 1712, at 5 (La.3/2/99), , citing Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019, at 9 (La.1/14/94), -50 ; Peyton Place, Condominium Ass’n, Inc. v. Guastella, 95-396, at 11 (La.App.
  • LaFleur v. Hollier Floor Covering, Inc. 774 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94); ."
  • Wolcott v. Trailways Lines, Inc. 774 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Brown v. Drillers, 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .
  • White v. General Motors Corp. 775 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Brown v. Drillers, Inc., 93-1019 (La.1/14/94), .