DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carter v. Western Kraft Paper Mill, 649 So. 2d 541.

19 citing documents.

  • Brittainey Huntley v. 21st Century Premier Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (citations omitted), the court explained: [A] directed verdict should only be granted when the facts and inferences point so strongly in favor of one party that the court believes reasonable people could not reach a contrary verdict.
  • Huntley v. 21st Century Premier Insurance Co. 204 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (citations omitted), the court explained: [A] directed verdict should only be granted when the facts and inferences point so strongly in favor of one party that the court believes reasonable people could not reach a contrary verdict.
  • Andre Perkins v. Tricia N. Guidry, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (citations omitted): [A] directed verdict should only be granted when the facts and inferences point so strongly in favor of one party that the court believes reasonable people could not reach a contrary verdict.
  • Perkins v. Guidry 191 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (citations omitted): [A] directed verdict should only be granted when the facts and inferences point so strongly in favor of one party that the court believes reasonable people could not reach a contrary verdict.
  • Hayward Allen, III v. Phi, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (citations omitted): [A] directed verdict should only be granted when the facts and inferences point so strongly in favor of one party that the court believes reasonable people could not reach a contrary verdict.
  • Allen v. Phi, Inc. 181 So. 3d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (citations omitted): [A] directed verdict should only be granted when the facts and inferences point so strongly in favor of one party that the court believes reasonable people could not reach a contrary verdict.
  • John Anthony Guidry v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (citations omitted): [A] directed verdict should only be granted when the facts and inferences point so strongly in favor of one party that the court believes reasonable people could not reach a contrary verdict.
  • Guidry v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc. 164 So. 3d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (citations omitted): [A] directed verdict should only be granted when the facts and inferences point so strongly in favor of one party that the court believes reasonable people could not reach a contrary verdict.
  • Brenda Mouton v. John C. Lemaire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Mouton v. LEMAIRE 970 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Leslie R. Roach v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (citations omitted), this court outlined the applicable rules: [A] directed verdict should only be granted when the facts and inferences point so strongly in favor of one party that the court believes reasonable people could not reach a contrary verdict.
  • Roach v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 969 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (citations omitted), this court outlined the applicable rules: [A] directed verdict should only be granted when the facts and inferences point so strongly in favor of one party that the court believes reasonable people could not reach a contrary verdict.
  • Joseph Lionel Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (citations omitted), this court outlined the applicable rules: [A] directed verdict should only be granted when the facts and inferences point so strongly in favor of one party that the court believes reasonable people could not reach a contrary verdict.
  • Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 11/2/94), (citations omitted), this court outlined the applicable rules: [A] directed verdict should only be granted when the facts and inferences point so strongly in favor of one party that the court believes reasonable people could not reach a contrary verdict.
  • Moore v. Brookshire Grocery Co., Inc. 805 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • Odom v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HOSP. 733 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • Scott v. American Olean Tile Co., Inc. 706 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • Odom v. Johnson 704 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    3 Cir. 11/2/94); , this court explained the applicable rules as follows: [A] directed verdict should only be granted when the facts and inferences point so strongly in favor of one party that the court believes reasonable people could not reach a contrary verdict.
  • Bernard v. Ferrellgas, Inc. 689 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997