Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bankston v. Alexandria Neurosurgical Clinic, 659 So. 2d 507.

16 citing documents.

Ashley Nicole Matt Hoffpauier v. Daniel Wayne Hoffpauir La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Finch v. HRI Lodging, Inc. 152 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
While pro se litigants should be allowed some latitude as they lack formal training in the law and its rules of procedure, see, Bankston v. Alexandria Neurosurgical Clinic, 94-693 (La.App.3d Cir.12/07/94), , they do assume responsibility for their own inadequacy and lack of knowledge of both procedural and substantive law.
Alton Leon Fields, Sr. v. Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Brooks v. Minnieweather 86 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
3d Cir.12/7/94), , writ not considered, 95-0465 (La.4/7/95), .
Mary Lu Doucet Hardee v. City of Jennings La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir.12/7/94), (citation omitted).
Hardee v. City of Jennings 65 So. 3d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir.12/7/94), (citation omitted).
Dowl v. Redi Care Home Health Ass'n 31 So. 3d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 12/7/94), -511 (“Filing pro se offers a party neither an impenetrable shield nor a license to harass others, clog the judicial machinery with meritless litigation, or abuse already overloaded court dockets.”).
Bentley v. Fanguy 3 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Wisner v. PDQ CONST. CO. 996 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
App. 3rd Cir. 12/7/97), , writ not considered, 95-0465 (La.4/7/95), .
Elta Moss v. Winfred Thomas Barrett III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Moss v. Barrett 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Gray v. State 923 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Henry Gray v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Dukes v. Sherwood Acres Apartments 898 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Girouard v. State ex rel. Department of Education 807 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
2nd Cir.12/7/94), , writ not considered, 95-0465 (La.4/7/95), .
Broussard v. Toce 746 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
3 Cir. 12/7/94) ; , writ not considered, 95-0465 (La.4/7/95); .