DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vaughan v. Hair, 645 So. 2d 1177.

18 citing documents.

  • Wade Conner v. Klarc Lemelle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    3 Cir. 10/5/94), writ denied, 95– 0123 (La.
  • Gordon R. Sibley and wife, Carolyn A. Sibley, and Katelyn D. Sibley, a minor by and through, Gordon … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
    App. 3d Cir. 10/ 5/ 94), writ denied, 95- 0123 ( La.
  • Julia B. Voinche v. Joseph Beaud Capps La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 10/5/94), writ denied, 95-123 (La.
  • Voinche v. Capps 155 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 10/5/94) , , writ denied, 95-123 (La.3/10/95), ).
  • Scott Hargrave, Et Ux. v. Cecil J. Delaughter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 10/5/94), writ denied, 95- 0123 (La.
  • Hargrave v. Delaughter 10 So. 3d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 10/5/94) , , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95), .
  • Woolard v. Atkinson 988 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    3rd Cir.10/5/94), , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95), .
  • Robert v. Lecompte 829 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    xceptions to this general rule “if (1) the employer provides the transportation the employee uses to go to and from work; (2) the employer provides expenses or wages for the time spent traveling in *1202 the vehicle; or (3) if the operation of the motor vehicle is incidental to or is actually the performance of some employment responsibility.” Vaughan v. Hair, 94-86, p. 4 (La.App 3 Cir. 10/5/94); , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95) .
  • Young v. Mooney 815 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 10/5/94) ; , writ Udenied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95); .
  • White v. Canonge 811 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 10/5/94) , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95), .
  • Phipps v. Bruno Const. 773 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    App. 3 Cir. 10/5/94); , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95); , explains the exceptions to the general rule: The jurisprudence has outlined three exceptions to the above rule.
  • Baggett v. Brumfield 758 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 10/5/94) ; , writ denied, 95-123 (La.3/10/95); .
  • Lacoste v. Crochet 751 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 10/5/94), , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95), .
  • Bell v. Hurstell 743 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 10/5/94) ; -83 , writ denied 95-0123 (La.3/10/95); , where the court stated that "there is no authority that would prohibit a person [employer] from allowing the consumption of alcoholic beverages on his premises by someone of lawful age."
  • Alford v. STATE FARM AUTO. INS. CO. 734 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • Washington v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 708 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    3rd Cir.10/5/94), , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95), .
  • Soileau v. D & J Tire, Inc. 702 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    3 Cir. 10/5/94) ; , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95); .
  • Norlander v. Illinois National Insurance Co. 672 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    3 Cir. 10/5/94) , , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.