DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Campbell v. DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSP. & DEV., 648 So. 2d 898.

127 citing documents.

  • Capone v. Ormet Corp. 822 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Graves v. Page, 96-2201, pp. 12-13 (La.11/7/97), ; Campbell v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development, 94-1052, pp. 5-6 (La.1/17/95), .
  • Petre v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 817 So. 2d 1107 La. 2002
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), .
  • Vallien v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 812 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), -02 ; Oster v. Department of Transp.
  • Fuselier v. Matranga 803 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    and Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), .
  • Trahan v. Asphalt Associates, Inc. 800 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Campbell v. Lousiana DOTD, 94-1052 (La.1/17/95); ; Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas.
  • Bridges v. FCS Entertainment 789 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    and Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), .
  • Bonds v. ABBEVILLE GENERAL HOSP. 782 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    and Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), .
  • Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RR 786 So. 2d 682 La. 2001
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), -02 ; Oster v. Department of Transp.
  • Snearl v. Mercer 780 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    48:21(A); Netecke v. State, Through DOTD, 98-1182, p. 7-8 (La.10/19/99), -95 ; Campbell v. Louisiana DOTD, 94-1052, p. 5-6 (La.1/17/95), -02 .
  • Odom v. City of Lake Charles 790 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95); , the supreme court found that the failure of the DOTD to install guardrails on a bridge was a cause-in-fact of the accident which resulted in the death of a passenger after the driver of the automobile fell asleep and veered onto the shoulder and the automobile struck the bridge abutment on the opposite side of the r
  • Petre v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 775 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95); .
  • Guilliams v. Succession of Harrel 774 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95); ; Smith v. Travelers Ins.
  • Whitcraft v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 771 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), -02 .
  • Scott v. Pyles 770 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    & Dev., 94-1052, p. 7 (La.1/17/95), .
  • LeBlanc v. Stevenson 770 So. 2d 766 La. 2000
    Campbell v. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, 94-1052 (La.1/17/95)
  • Fleming v. Hilton Hotels Corp. 774 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    and Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), .
  • Ruttley v. Lee 761 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    and Development, 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), ; LSA-R.S.
  • Gray v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 761 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    and Dev., 94-1052, p. 5 (La.1/17/95), .
  • Ford v. STATE, EX REL. DOTD 760 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    & Dev., 94-1052, p. 7 (La.1/17/95); ( citing Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas.
  • Lee v. State 751 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Barsavage v. State, Through Department of Transportation and Development , 96-0688, at p. 9, 686 So.2d at 962 (quoting Campbell v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development, 94-1052 p. 5-6 (La.1/17/95), ).
  • Cole v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 755 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95); .
  • Cole v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 755 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95); .
  • Ditch v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 745 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF STATE DOTD: Campbell v. Louisiana DOTD, 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), , at 901-02: “[2] [3] Next, we must determine whether DOTD was at fault.
  • Netecke v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 747 So. 2d 489 La. 1999
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), -02 ; Oster v. Department of Transp.
  • Courteaux v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. 745 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    and Development, 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), ; Bessard v. State, Dept. of Transp.
  • Cormier v. Comeaux 748 So. 2d 1123 La. 1999
    & Development, 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), -02 .
  • Edwards v. Daugherty 729 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    & Development, 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), .
  • Cazes v. Parish of West Baton Rouge 744 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    & Dev., 94-1052, p. 5 (La.1/17/95); .
  • Haile v. City of Monroe 722 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    9:2800; Lee v. State, Through DOTD, 97-0350 (La.10/21/97), ; Campbell v. State, Through DOTD, 94-1052 (La.01/17/95), ; Townsend v. Westinghouse Elevator Corporation, 25,966 (La.App.2d Cir.08/17/94), , writ denied, 94-2371 (La.11/29/94), .
  • Soileau v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 724 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95); , advanced by the plaintiff in the argument above, indicates that the Louisiana Supreme Court clearly found that there may be multiple causes-in-fact in a tort suit.
  • Bell v. Ayio 731 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    See, e.g., Hill v. Morehouse Parish Police Jury, 95-1100 (La.1/16/96); (15-year old boy killed in car accident, father awarded $150,000 general damages); Campbell v. Department of Transportation and Development, 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), (each parent awarded $150,000 general damages for death of son killed in car accident); 3-year old killed in pedestrian/bus accident, single mother awarded $150,000).
  • Dufrene v. Willingham 721 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    and Development, and Hunter v. Department of Transp.
  • Deville v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 719 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95); .
  • Ledoux v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 719 So. 2d 43 La. 1998
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), .
  • Bowens v. Patterson 716 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95); (75% fault to DOTD, 25% fault to driver); Rochelle v. State, Through Dept. of Transp.
  • Cormier v. Comeaux 714 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95); ; Boutte v. Nissan Motor Corp., 94-1470 (La.App.
  • Caruthers v. State 711 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95); .
  • Jones v. Hawkins 708 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), ; Summerall v. Ouachita Parish School Bd., 27,643 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/8/95), .
  • Brown v. Louisiana Indem. Co. 707 So. 2d 1240 La. 1998
  • Hammons v. City of Tallulah 705 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • Odom v. Johnson 704 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    & Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95); .
  • Graves v. Page 703 So. 2d 566 La. 1997
    1/17/95); -51 (La.1993); [3] The plaintiff must prove custody, defect and causation and DOTD must have knowledge of the hazardous condition.
  • Thompson v. State 701 So. 2d 952 La. 1997
  • Shephard on Behalf of Shephard v. Scheeler 701 So. 2d 1308 La. 1997
    Campbell v. DOTD, 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), .
  • Lee v. STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 701 So. 2d 676 La. 1997
    and Dev., 94-1052, p.5 (La.1/17/95), .
  • Whigham v. Boyd 700 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    & Dev., 94-1052 p. 5 (La.1/17/96); (inter quotation marks omitted); See also Bessard v. State, Dept. of Transp.
  • Owens v. Concordia Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 699 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Campbell, ; Boutte v. Nissan Motor Corp., 94-1470 (La.App.
  • Williams v. Dean 694 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    1/17/95); ; Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corporation, 94-0952, pp. 4-5 (La.
  • Nunn v. Financial Indemnity Co. 694 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    1/17/95), ; Vig v. City of Shreveport, 28,530 (La.App.
  • Wilson v. City of New Orleans 693 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997