Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Campbell v. DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSP. & DEV., 648 So. 2d 898.

127 citing documents.

Brown v. Louisiana Indem. Co. 693 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
This dissenting opinion became the unanimous opinion of the Louisiana Supreme Court when Justice Marcus authored the opinion of that court in Campbell v. Louisiana DOTD found at
Edwards v. Horstman 687 So. 2d 1007 La. 1997
& Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17/95); ; Smith v. Travelers Ins.
Rhodes v. State Through DOTD 684 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
See Campbell v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development, 94-1052 p. 5 (La.1/17/95), ; Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corporation, 94-0952 pp. 4-5 (La.11/30/94), ; Roberts *1141 v. Benoit, on rehearing, reh.
Barsayage v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 686 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
That “duty encompasses the obligation to protect a motorist who inadvertently drives onto the shoulder of the highway.” Campbell v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development, 94-1052 p. 5-6 (La.1/17/95), .
Barsavage v. STATE DOTD 686 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Campbell v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development, 94-1052 p. 5-6 (La.1/17/95), .
Teel v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 681 So. 2d 340 La. 1996
& Dev., 94-1052 p. 5 (La.1/17/95), (stating that under R.S.
Farley v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 680 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Campbell v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development, 94-1052, P. 4 (La.1/17/95); .
Odom v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 688 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
1/17/95); ; Miller v. Evangeline Parish Police Jury, 95-566 (La.App.
Hataway v. Jeep Corp. 679 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Graves v. Page 688 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
1/17/95), , as a precise statement of the Louisiana State Department of ^Transportation and Development’s liability in cases, such as the one at bar.
Boykin v. Louisiana Transit Co. 676 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Rhodes v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 674 So. 2d 239 La. 1996
1/17/95); (internal quotation marks omitted); See also Bessard v. State, Dept. of Transp.
Rhodes v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 674 So. 2d 239 La. 1996
1/17/95); (internal quotation marks omitted); See also Bessard v. State, Dept. of Transp.
Gibson v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 674 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Gibson v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 674 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Miller v. STATE, DOTD 679 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
The DOTD presents an argument similar to its argument in Campbell v. DOTD, 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), , i.e., that the dangerous condition did not cause the motorist to lose control of his vehicle and thus was not a cause-in-fact of the accident.
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc. 666 So. 2d 1073 La. 1996
& Dev., this court faced a similar obstacle in reapportioning fault between two tortfeasors when the trial court made an assessment of liability, but on appeal, the appellate court reapportioned fault.
Ventress v. Union Pacific RR Co. 666 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Andrews v. Ferguson 668 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
E.g., Campbell v. DOTD, 94-1052 at 5-6 (La.1-17-95), .
Regional Transit Authority v. Lemoine 664 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Dowden v. Mid State Sand & Gravel Co. 664 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
& Dev., 94-1052 (La.1/17//95), .
Boutte v. Nissan Motor Corp. 663 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Craft v. Allstate Ins. Co. 663 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
See Campbell v. DOTD, 94-1052 (La.1/17/95); .
Galloway v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVE. 654 So. 2d 1345 La. 1995
Black v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 657 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University 655 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
01/17/95), , the court stated: Ledford's negligence [falling asleep at the wheel] set the course for an accident to happen, but the harm or injuries to the guest passengers in Ledford's vehicle were a direct result of the impact with the concrete bridge abutment [when a guardrail would have reduced the force of the impact by 80%
Hartman v. Vermilion Parish Police Jury 651 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
& Dev., (No. 94-C-1052 (La.