Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 652 So. 2d 1299.

69 citing documents.

Jared Benoit v. Jason Bourgeois, Roland LeBlanc d/b/a LeBlanc Tree Service, ABC Insurance Company and DEF Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
4110195), as an example).
Agrifund, LLC v. Radar Ridge Planting Co., Inc. and Thomas A. Dickerson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
4/10/95), Pepper v. Triplett, 2003-0619 (La.
Explained Warren Doucet v. Superior Gauging Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
4/10/95), the individual circumstances6 of the present case do not establish that the tank being dismantled 6 As explained in Celestine, 652 So.2d at 1304: [T]he individual circumstances, including but not limited to the social, moral, economic considerations, the degree of knowledge of the repai
Doucet v. Superior Gauging Servs., Inc. 268 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
4/10/95), , the individual circumstances 6 of the present case do not establish that the tank being dismantled presented an unreasonable risk of harm.
Boutall v. Christakis, P.M., Co. 236 So. 3d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4/10/95), ; Millien v. Jackson , 09-56 (La.
Nugent v. Car Town of Monroe, Inc. 206 So. 3d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Waddles v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 181 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
A determination of whether a thing presents an unreasonable risk of harm should be made “in light of all relevant moral, economic, and social consideration.”
Doris Bell v. Dolgencorp, LLC D/B/A Dollar General Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Markus Trautmann, Et Ux. v. Charles G. Fitzgerald La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
See, e.g., Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 98-1868 (La.4/10/95)
Trautmann v. Fitzgerald 113 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See, e.g., Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, [94-1868] (La.4/10/95), .
McClelland v. City of Shreveport 108 So. 3d 810 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Rather, the determination of whether a thing presents an unreasonable risk of harm should be made “in light of all relevant moral, economic, and social considerations.” Id., citing Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95)
Arlene Chambers v. Village of Moreauville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Chambers v. Village of Moreauville 60 So. 3d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Celestine v. Union Oil of Cal., 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), .
Meaux v. Wendy's International, Inc. 51 So. 3d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See, e.g., Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 98-1868 (La.4/10/95), .
MILLIEN v. Jackson 30 So. 3d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See, e.g., Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 98-1868 (La.4/10/95), .
Jerry Ramos v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Ramos v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 977 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Dupree v. City of New Orleans, 99-3651, pp. 13-14 (La.8/31/00), (quoting Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), ).
Carl Harris Hesse v. Champ Service Line La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hesse v. CHAMP SERVICE LINE 933 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 5/4/94) ; , writ granted, 94-1868 (La.11/11/94); , affirmed, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95); .
Sevin v. Parish of Plaquemines 901 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 95-1868 (La.4/10/95), .
Christopher Sims v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Sims v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 897 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
at 1012 ( quoting Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of Calif., 94-1868, p. 9 (La.4/10/95), ).
Michael Orr v. Otto Candies, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Orr v. Otto Candies, Inc. 875 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
at 1082 , quoting Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), .
Wiley v. Sanders 850 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), ; Jackson v. Beasley, supra .
Simmons v. King 833 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.04/10/95), ; Boyle v. Board of Supervisors, Louisiana State University, 96-1158 (La.01/14/97), ; Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.03/04/98), .
Baker v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. 816 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), ; Entrevia [v. Hood]
Vinccinelli v. Musso 818 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868, pp. 8-9 (La.4/10/95), .
Lofton v. Hayward 806 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), ; Sistler, supra.
Moody v. Blanchard Place Apartments 793 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95)
Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RR 786 So. 2d 682 La. 2001
Sistler, *694 558 So.2d at 1112 ; Entrevia, 427 So.2d at 1146 .
Melerine v. State 773 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
The Louisiana Supreme Court most recently interpreted the pre-amendment article governing the strict liability of the owner of premises in Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.1995), as follows: An owner's liability for a vice or defect on the premises is rooted in La.
Brunet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 772 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
[2] Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), .
LeBlanc v. Breaux 777 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (4/10/95), -1304 (La.1995), the Louisiana.
Roberts v. State 776 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., 94-1868, p. 8 (La.4/10/95); .
Kendall v. WEINGARTEN REALTY MGMT. CO. 769 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.04/10/95), at 1303-1304
Dupree v. City of New Orleans 765 So. 2d 1002 La. 2000
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), .
Myles v. Cain's Coffee Co. 756 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
A determination of whether a thing presents an unreasonable risk of harm should be made “in light of all relevant moral, economic, and social consideration.” Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95)
Johnson v. Brookshire Grocery Co., Inc. 754 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Trice v. Isaac 759 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
[10] Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-C-1868 (La.4/10/95), ; Lopez v. State, Louisiana Health Care Authority/University Medical Center, 98-577 (La.App.
Cortez v. Zurich Ins. Co. 752 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868, pp. 6-7 (La.4/10/95), .
Oubre v. Union Carbide Corp. 747 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), .
Hooker v. Super Products Corp. 751 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), .
Penton v. Schuster 732 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
STRICT LIABILITY In Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-C-1868 (La.4/10/95), , our Supreme Court discussed the liability of the owner of premises for injuries suffered.
Dufour v. EZ SERVE CONVENIENCE STORES 731 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 98-1868 (La.4/10/95), .
Banks v. New Orleans Sewerage & Water Board 728 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
The determination of whether a thing presents an unreasonable risk of harm should be made “in light of all relevant moral, economic and social considerations.” Boyle, supra at 1082; -1304 (La.1995)
Lopez v. STATE, LOUISIANA HEALTH CARE 721 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
More specifically, in Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95); , the Louisiana Supreme Court articulated the legal definitions of "defect" and "unreasonable" risk and the limitations placed on an owner's liability.
Small v. Baloise Ins. Co. of America 753 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
See Celestine v. Union Oil Company of California, 94-1868, p. 7 (La.4/10/95), .
Jones v. Hawkins 708 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), .
Gilbert v. BDOWS, INC. 711 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), ; McCarthy v. First Financial Ins., 30,015 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/10/97), .