DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 652 So. 2d 1299.

69 citing documents.

  • Jackson v. Beasley 712 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    art. 966; Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), .
  • Hammons v. City of Tallulah 705 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • McCarthy v. First Financial Ins. 705 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • Bison v. Primrose 705 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • Delpit v. Greater Lakeside Corp. 701 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95); .
  • LaFrance v. Bourgeois 701 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    In the present case, plaintiffs, citing Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94 1868 (La.4/10/95), , requested that the trial judge instruct the jury as follows: An owner's liability for vice or defect on the premises is rooted in Civil Code Article 2317 and 2322.
  • Nichols v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 698 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95)
  • Gorman v. Spann 697 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    I didn’t have the personnel.” DISCUSSION In the trial court’s ruling, the court cited Celestine v. Union Oil Company of California, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), , in which the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that a plaintiffs status as a repairman is a significant factor in determination of whether a risk is unreasonable.
  • Taylor v. Moseley 698 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Celestino v. Union Oil Co. of Ca., 94-1868 (La.4/10/95), .
  • Williams v. Rouse's Enterprises, Inc. 693 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    See Celestine v. Union Oil Co., 94-1868, p. 7 (La.4/10/95), .
  • McKey v. General Motors Corp. 691 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    See also Celestine v. Union Oil Company of California, 94-1868, p. 11 (La.4/10/95), ; (La.App.
  • Boyle v. Board of Sup'rs 685 So. 2d 1080 La. 1997
  • Gray v. Economy Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 682 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir. 5/4/94) ; , writ granted, 94-1868 (La.11/11/94); , affirmed, 94-1868 (La.4/10/95); .
  • Dorthlon v. ST. FRANCIS MED. CENTER 677 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • Sanders v. Posi-Seal International 668 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    4/10/95); , a repairman sued the owner of a building for an injury allegedly caused by the condition which he was hired to repair.
  • Hebert v. Southwest La. Elec. Mem. Corp. 667 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • Genusa v. B & B Steel Metal & Roofing 663 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    the Supreme Court acknowledges that there is no "blanket" repair man exception to strict liability under La.C.C.
  • Carter v. Exide Corp. 661 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    4/10/95), , which squarely held that an owner of a defective thing that poses an unreasonable risk of harm to a repairman of the thing may be strictly liable under some circumstances to the repairman for injury caused by the defective thing.
  • McAdams v. La. Power & Light Co. 659 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995