Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 646 So. 2d 859.

253 citing documents.

  • Explained Taylor v. Clement 947 So. 2d 730 La. 2007
    In Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238, p. 9 (La.11/30/94), , we explained that the purpose of this requirement was to allow the parties to brief and argue the issue at a contradictory hearing in order to make a full record for this court's review: The requirement of specially pleading the unconstitutionality of a statute in pleadings implies that this notable issue will
  • Explained Arrington v. Galen-Med, Inc. 947 So. 2d 724 La. 2007
    In Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238, p. 9 (La.11/30/94), , we explained that the purpose of this requirement was to allow the parties to brief and argue the issue at a contradictory hearing in order to make a full record for this court's review: The requirement of specially pleading the unconstitutionality of a statute in pleadings implies that this notable issue will
  • Alex v. Rayne Concrete Service 951 So. 2d 138 La. 2007
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 946 So. 2d 144 La. 2006
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238, p. 9 (La.11/30/94), ; Herbert v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 255 La.
  • Marks v. New Orleans Police Dept. 943 So. 2d 1028 La. 2006
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -865 .
  • Lamz v. Wells 938 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    11/30/94), -65 (footnote omitted).
  • Roudakis v. City of Ruston 927 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    In Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., et al., 94-1238 (La.11/30/04), -65 , the court stated: Our Code of Civil Procedure does not require a single procedure or type of proceeding for challenging or assailing the constitutionality of a statute.
  • Ceasar v. Hebert 926 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Irving Ceasar v. Sheriff Sid Hebert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Kirby v. Field 923 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    See Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Plainview Area Association, Inc. v. State of La La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Plainview Area Ass'n v. State 907 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Because we may not address the constitutionality issue on our own, we remand,the case to the trial court so that plaintiff may specifically plead the issue in accordance with Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Mallard Bay Drilling, Inc. v. Kennedy 914 So. 2d 533 La. 2005
    Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 03-0732, p. 6 (La.1/19/05), (on rehearing); Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 .
  • Willis-Knighton Medical v. Sales Tax Com'n 903 So. 2d 1071 La. 2005
    See Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238, p. 9 (La.11/30/94), -866 .
  • State v. White 907 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    See Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), ; State v. Winn, 39,104 (La.App.
  • PLAINVIEW AREA ASS'N v. State 900 So. 2d 837 La. 2005
    NOTES [1] Should the court of appeal ultimately reverse the trial court's factual finding, it may not raise the issue of constitutionality on its own, but may remand the case to allow the plaintiffs to specially plead this issue in accordance with the requirements of Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • State v. Fasola 901 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    (citing Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), ).
  • Reed v. Reed 897 So. 2d 584 La. 2005
    In Vallo v. Gayle Oil *585 Company, Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/20/94), , this court explained that the unconstitutionality of a statute must be specially pleaded in the district court: Our Code of Civil Procedure does not require a single procedure or type of proceeding for challenging or assailing the constitutionality of a statute.
  • DENHAM SPRINGS v. All Taxpayers 894 So. 2d 325 La. 2005
    See Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), , 865 and State v. Schoening, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/17/00), .
  • Billieson v. City of New Orleans 893 So. 2d 867 La. 2005
    In Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/20/94), , this court explained that the unconstitutionality of a statute must be specially pleaded in the district court: Our Code of Civil Procedure does not require a single procedure or type of proceeding for challenging or assailing the constitutionality of a statute.
  • Taylor v. LSU Medical Center 892 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    See Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Unwired Telecom v. Parish of Calcasieu 903 So. 2d 392 La. 2005
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • GREATER NEW ORLEANS EXP. COM'N v. Olivier 892 So. 2d 570 La. 2005
    See Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co. Inc., 94-1238, (La.1994), .
  • State v. Girod 892 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    (citing Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), ).
  • State v. Winn 890 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    *703 See Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • State v. Brooks 889 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    (citing Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), ).
  • Mr. Darryl J. Simmons v. Sheriff Hal Turner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    11/30/94), the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed a case in which the application of a statute to the situation at bar was asserted to be unconstitutional.
  • Simmons v. Turner 888 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed a case in which the application of a statute to the situation at bar was asserted to be unconstitutional.
  • Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. State 886 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • State v. Myles 887 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • In Re Succession of Halligan 887 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    art. 1880; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • CITY OF BROUSSARD VERSUS MICHAEL WATKINS/dba Michael's International La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94)
  • City of Broussard v. Watkins 869 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Rosen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 870 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    art. 852, see Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), , neither party has alleged or denied these crucial facts.
  • Grant Reno v. Scafco, Ltd. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Reno v. SCAFCO 870 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238, p. 7 (La.11/30/94), .
  • In Re Trahan 866 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    [5] Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94); -65 .
  • LOUISIANA ASSESSORS'RETIREMENT FUND v. City of New Orleans 864 So. 2d 200 La. 2004
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 at p. 8 (La.11/30/94), ; -397 (La.1976); Summerell v. Phillips, 258 La.
  • FOXY'S HEALTH AND RACQUET v. Allbritton 859 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), -65 .
  • Huber v. Midkiff 838 So. 2d 771 La. 2003
    In Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94); , this Court held that the attorney general must be served with a copy of the proceeding and is entitled to represent the state's interest in the proceeding when the constitutionality of a statute is questioned.
  • Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu 838 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc. 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • State v. EXPUNGED RECORD NUMBER 249,044 833 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 7 (La.11/30/94); .
  • Lanthier v. Family Dollar Store 836 So. 2d 5 La. 2002
    See also Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 ; Lemire v. New Orleans Pub.
  • State v. Williams 830 So. 2d 984 La. 2002
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Mosing v. Domas 830 So. 2d 967 La. 2002
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Lanthier v. Family Dollar Store 827 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8, n. 9 (La.11/30/94); n. 9 .
  • Seaward v. City of Hammond 822 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    See and compare Georgia Gulf Corporation v. Board of Ethics for Public Employees, 96-1907, pp. 5-6 (La.5/9/97), -176 ; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238, pp. 7-8 (La.11/30/94), -65 .
  • Dauterive Contractors, Inc. v. Landry and Watkins 811 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238, p. 7 (La.11/30/94); (emphasis in original).
  • Benson v. City of Marksville 812 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 (footnote omitted).
  • Perez v. Trahant 806 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 .