DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 646 So. 2d 859.

253 citing documents.

  • Stelly v. Ieyoub 799 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    3 In Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 7 (La.11/30/94); , the Louisiana Supreme Court referenced both La.R.S.
  • Lay v. Scott 809 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 .
  • Vieux Carre Property Owners, Residents & Associates, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 797 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Without expressing any opinion as to the merits of that argument, we note that the alleged unconstitutionality of the statute may not be raised for the first time upon appeal, but must, instead be specifically pleaded in the district court, e.g., Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.1994), , and the plaintiffs-appellants did not so plead the unconstitutionality of the ordinances in the district court.
  • Abuan ex rel. Valdez v. Smedvig Tankships, Ltd. 786 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 9/28/95) , , citing Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.ll/3Q/94), -65 .
  • Kennedy v. MacAluso 791 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    The record reveals that the Kennedys complied with the requirements for properly presenting a constitutional issue to the trial court as espoused in Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), , 865: the issue was specifically pled in a pleading (their original petition), and the attorney general was served with a copy of that petition, notifying him of the constitutional challenge to the statute.
  • Louisiana Assessors' Retirement Fund v. City of New Orleans 796 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -865 ; In re Adoption of EHM, 00-2705, p. 6 (La.App.
  • Metro Riverboat Associates v. La. Gaming Bd. 774 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See also Istre v. Meche, 00-1316, p. 15 (La.10/17/00), ; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), , 864-865 n. 9.
  • In Re Adoption of EHM 808 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -865 ; Succession of Barthel, 99-1573, p. 8 (La.App.
  • Becnel v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 773 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    citing Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), -865 .
  • Williams v. JACKSON PARISH HOSP. 768 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Williams v. Jackson Parish Hospital, supra
  • State v. Schoening 770 So. 2d 762 La. 2000
    v. Connick, 94-3161, p. 6 (La.3/9/95), ; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 ; Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • Istre v. Meche 770 So. 2d 776 La. 2000
    See also Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 ; Lemire v. New Orleans Pub.
  • Nicholas v. Allstate Ins. Co. 765 So. 2d 1017 La. 2000
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), (noting that the requirements of Lemire v. New Orleans Public Serv., Inc., "that the constitutionality of a statute must first be questioned in the trial court and that the plea of unconstitutionality must be specifically pled to be considered by the trial court").
  • State v. Brewster 764 So. 2d 945 La. 2000
    See Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co. Inc., et al., 94-CA-1238
  • Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Keel 765 So. 2d 325 La. 2000
  • In Re Succession of Barthel 762 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 .
  • Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hosp. Serv. 759 So. 2d 45 La. 2000
    School, 95-0157 (La.10/16/95), ; Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), ; Taylor v. *51 Giddens, Becker v. Allstate Ins.
  • State v. Brewster 764 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    11/30/94), , for this proposition.
  • Liner v. Daughters of Charity of St. Vincent DePaul, Inc. 753 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Sims 745 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), ; Williams v. Jackson Parish Hospital, 31,492 (La.App.2d Cir.01/13/99), , writ denied, 99-0458 (La.04/01/99), .
  • Rougeau v. Hyundai Motor America 748 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    In Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94); , the Louisiana Supreme stated that the constitutionality of a statute must first be questioned in that trial court, that the issue must be specifically pled to be considered by the trial court, and that the attorney general should be served with a copy of the pleading in which the constitutionality of a state st
  • Chinn v. Mitchell 734 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    [3] Moreover, the prerequisites for raising the issue of the unconstitutionality of a statute, as set forth in Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 7 (La.11/30/94); , are not met.
  • Williams v. Jackson Parish Hosp. 729 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    See Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., *624
  • Basco v. Dorthy R. Racine Trucking, Inc. 725 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    The prerequisites for raising the issue of the unconstitutionality of a statute are set forth in Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94); .
  • Layman v. City of New Orleans 753 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), .
  • In re Medical Review Panel of Harris 725 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94); -865 .
  • Pommier v. ABC Ins. Co. 715 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    See e.g., Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co. Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94); .
  • Catanese v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd. 712 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    In Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), , the supreme court set out the criteria which must be met before a claim that a statute is not constitutional can be considered by the courts.
  • Johnson v. Aymond 709 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, in the case of Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94); -65 , stated: Our Code of Civil Procedure does not require a single procedure or type of proceeding for challenging or assailing the constitutionality of a statute.
  • Latter v. ABC Insurance 708 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Reeder v. North, supra at p. 14 , 701 So.2d at 1299 , quoting Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Smith v. Willard 711 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Johnson v. Carter 707 So. 2d 1366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94) 865 .
  • Romaguera v. Overby 709 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Plaintiff did not raise this issue in her petition or in any other pleading as required by Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc.
  • Descant v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 706 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), *636 .
  • Descant v. ADM'RS OF TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND 706 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), *636 .
  • Cryer v. Cryer 706 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Company, Inc., 94-1238, p. 9 (La.11/30/94); .
  • Legros v. Westlake Polymers Corp. 704 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    See Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94); .
  • Reeder v. North 701 So. 2d 1291 La. 1997
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), -865 ; see also Hillman v. Akins, 93-0631 (La.1/14/94), (plaintiff first raised constitutionality of medical malpractice statute in opposition memorandum to defendant's exception).
  • Williams v. State, Dept. of Health and Hospitals 703 So. 2d 579 La. 1997
    Accord Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc.
  • City of Kenner v. Jumonville 701 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • State v. Saizan 692 So. 2d 1045 La. 1997
    Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94); .
  • Bustamente v. JEFFERSON PARISH INSP. 683 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    The leading case on the proper procedure for attacking the constitutionality of a statute is Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Levron v. State 673 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Phillip v. Home Ins. Co. 671 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    11/30/94); *949 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that appellants' claim that a statute is unconstitutional must be pled in a petition.
  • Allen v. Carollo 674 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Carver, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 672 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    11/30/94), , as reaffirmed in Williams v. State of Louisiana, Department of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713 (La.
  • Matter of Rubicon, Inc. 670 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals 671 So. 2d 899 La. 1996
    See Vallo v. *902 Gayle Oil Co., Inc.
  • Rey v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 665 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • Rodgers v. James River II, Inc. 661 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    11/30/94), -65 (citations omitted).