Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Whitney Nat. Bank v. Rockwell, 661 So. 2d 1325.

34 citing documents.

Brokenburn, Inc. v. Cross Keys Bank and Bradley Bridges La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
10/16/95), Jesco Const. Corp. v. Nationsbank Corp., 02- 0057 (La.
Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC Versus Olethia Davis La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
10/16/95), (affirming appellate court’s determination that when a defendant does not assert facts that constitute a valid defense to enforcement of a promissory note, there is no genuine issue of material fact, and bank is entitled to judgment as a matter of law).
Rita Garlington Weekley Chapman Leger v. Bank of New York, Mellon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
10/16/95), (footnote omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: The Louisiana Legislature in 1989 enacted La.Rev.Stat.
Elysian, Inc. and Cusachs Family Collection, L.L.C. v. Neal Auction Company, Inc., Philip B. Alford, John J. Booth, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Barbara Mcnorton Hovell v. Origin Bank F/k/a Community Trust Bank La. 2021
10/16/95), the Court stated: “[T]he primary legislative purpose in enacting credit agreement statutes was to establish certainty as to the contractual liability of financial institutions.
Sergeant v. DeRung 213 So. 3d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2017
10/16/95), , 1329 n. 3; Gerrets v. Gerrets, 06-0087, p. 4 (La.App.
Dupuy Storage & Forwarding, LLC v. Max Speciality Insurance Co. 203 So. 3d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Plummer v. EverBank 195 So. 3d 693 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2016
Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049, p. 8 (La.10/16/95), (“credit agreement statutes preclude the borrower’s reliance on oral side agreements”); Fortenberry v. Hibernia Nat.
Blow v. OneBeacon America Insurance Co. 193 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049, p. 6 (La.10/16/95), .
Tsegaye v. City of New Orleans 183 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049, p. 6 (La.10/16/95), , 1329 n. 3 (“when (1) there is no dispute of material fact, (2) the ruling of the trial court appears incorrect, and (3) a reversal would terminate the litigation as to at least one party, the intermediate court should review the merits of the application for supervisory writs”); cf. also Herlitz Const. Co., Inc. v.
First Bank & Trust v. Simmons 165 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2015
Palmisano v. Nauman-Anderson 167 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Whitney Nat’l Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049 (La.10/16/95), .
Woodlands Development, L.L.C. v. Regions Bank 141 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 6/12/13) , , writs denied, 13-2218, 13-2219 (La.12/2/13), , the court reviewed the jurisprudence interpreting this statute, as set forth in Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049 (La.10/16/95), ; Jesco Construction Co. v. Nationsbank Corp. 02-0057 (La.10/25/02), ; and King v. Parish National Bank, 04-337 (La.10/19/04), .
St. Landry Homestead Federal Savings Bank v. Hubert Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
St. Landry Homestead Federal Savings Bank v. Vidrine 118 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The Louisiana Supreme Court first addressed the application of the Louisiana Credit Agreement Act to the creditor/debtor relationship in Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049 (La.10/16/95), .
Woodlands Development, L.L.C. v. Regions Bank 83 So. 3d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See Whitney Nat’l Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049 (La.10/16/95), ; Bernard v. Iberia Bank, 01-2234 (La.App.
Mobile-One Auto Sound, Inc. v. Whitney National Bank 78 So. 3d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049, p. 11 (La.10/16/95), .
King v. Parish National Bank 885 So. 2d 540 La. 2004
Whitney Nat'l Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049, p. 7 (La.10/16/95), .
Weber v. Ray Brandt Nissan, Inc. 880 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
*1005 In Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049 (La.1995), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that “[a] material fact is one whose existence or nonexistence may be essential to plaintiffs cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery, i.e., one that would matter on the trial of the merits.” The Supreme Court then stated that “[a] genuine issue is a triable i
Fortenberry v. Hibernia Nat. Bank 852 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
In Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049 (La.10/16/95), , the defendant had executed a promissory note to the bank, but in response to the bank's efforts to collect, the defendant asserted that the bank breached an oral agreement to accept interest-only payments and then to grant a term of years for repayment in monthly installments.
Bernard v. Iberia Bank 832 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049, p. 13 (La.10/16/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held: The alleged oral agreement by the Bank to require interest-only payments for a period of time and then to amortize the payments over a period of years was clearly an agreement to forbear repayment and to make financial accommodations that constituted a credit agreement under t
Jesco Const. Corp. v. Nationsbank Corp. 830 So. 2d 989 La. 2002
The District Court made an "Erie guess" based on this court's dicta in Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049 (La.10/16/95); , ruling that Article 6:1122 did bar Jesco's breach of contract claim, but that it did not bar Jesco's alternative theories of recovery.
Knight v. Magee 835 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
[7] The Louisiana Supreme Court declined to adopt the blanket rule of Fleming Irrigation, Inc. in the case of Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049, p. 13 (La.10/16/95), n. 6 , choosing instead to confine its holding to the claim before it.
Hibernia Nat. Bank v. CONTRACTOR'S EQUIP. 804 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
In Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049 (La.10/16/95); , the supreme court stated: Similar to the D'Oench Duhme doctrine, these credit agreement statutes preclude the borrower's reliance on oral side agreements.
Guzzardo-Knight v. Central Progressive Bank 762 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049 (La.10/16/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court observed that credit agreement statutes represent a legislative reaction to the recent surge in lender liability litigation.
Peoples State Bank v. Hwy One Crawfish, Inc. 771 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049, p. 7 (La.10/16/95); -30 (citations omitted).
Diamond Services Corp. v. Benoit 757 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
According to Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049 (La.10/16/95); , the Louisiana Supreme Court, noting the importance of the banking statutes, refused to adopt a "blanket rule" prohibiting all actions on credit agreements unless the agreement is in writing.
Giuffria v. Metro Bank 735 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
6:1122; Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049 (La.10/16/95), ; Casey v. Hibernia Corp., 97-1273 (La.App.
Ultra Fabricators, Inc. v. MC BANK 724 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049, p. 10 (La.10/16/95); .
Casey v. Hibernia Corp. 709 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
See generally, Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049 (La.10/16/95), (extensive discussion of LCA Statute); Fleming Irrigation v. Pioneer Bank & Trust, 27,262 (La.App.2d Cir. 8/23/95), , writ denied, 95-2357 (La.12/8/95), ; DiGioia, Whitney National Bank v. Rockwell: The Louisiana Supreme Court Enforces the Statute of Frauds for Credit Agreements, 70 Tu
Galan v. Covenant House New Orleans 695 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Bank v. Rockwell, 94-3049 (La.10/16/95), .
McGill v. Cochran Sysco Foods 690 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Landrum v. Board of Com'rs 685 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Knapper v. Connick 668 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996