Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Louis, 645 So. 2d 1144.

57 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Rickarin Johnson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana Versus Jeremy Andre Sinceno La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
11/30/94), “A contract is formed by the consent of the parties established through offer and acceptance.” In the instant case, it appears that the defendant’s plea agreement with the State originally included a stipulation that the plea would not be entered under any “special circumstances,” specifically a plea pursuant t
State of Louisiana v. Joshua J. Ward La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus ONE (1) 2003 DODGE RAM 3500 QUAD CAB, LOUISIANA LICENSE : B865, VIN : … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
La. 2020
See State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), – 49 (court “refer [s] first to the law of contracts for application by analogy,” but founds its analysis on “considerations of constitutional fairness”), citing Ricketts v. Adamson , 483 U.S. 1, 16, 107 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana Versus Hursen A. Patin La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State v. Westley 263 So. 3d 888 La. 2019
11/30/94), , 1149 (internal citations removed).
State v. Collins 263 So. 3d 878 La. 2019
11/30/94), , 1149 (internal citations removed).
State v. Nixon 254 So. 3d 1228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Patterson 244 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Foster 224 So. 3d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
11/30/94), -49 ; -05 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Woodrow Karey, Jr., A/K/A Woodrow Karey, II La. 2017
11/30/94), -49; -05 (La.
State v. Allah 216 So. 3d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
11/30/94), , the Supreme Court referred to the law of contracts for application by analogy in determining whether a plea agreement existed.
State v. Young 215 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Cotton 194 So. 3d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), .
State v. Runnels 182 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Mitchell, supra (citing State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), ; Roberts, supra).
State of Louisiana v. Woodrow Karey, Jr. AKA Woodrow Karey, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
11/30/94), the supreme court revisited the issue of the enforcement of pretrial agreements.
State v. Karey 180 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In State v. Louis, 94-761 (La.l1/30/94), , the supreme court revisited the issue of the enforcement of pretrial agreements.
State v. Young 174 So. 3d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 7 (La.11/30/94), at 1149 .
Boddye v. LA. Dept. of Corrections 175 So. 3d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 7 (La.11/30/94), .
State v. Epperley 151 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 4/7/99), (citing State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), ).
State v. Sullivan 146 So. 3d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
In State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), , the supreme court held that contractual principles may be helpful by analogy in deciding disputes | ^involving plea agreements.
State ex rel. E.C. 141 So. 3d 785 La. 2014
The enforcement of a plea bargain, the majority correctly acknowledges, requires a court to “refer first to the law of contracts,” but a “criminal defendant’s constitutional right to fairness may be broader than his or her rights under contract laws.” State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), -49 .
State v. Solomon 80 So. 3d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 7 (La.11/30/94), .
State v. Mitchell 7 So. 3d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 7 (La.11/30/94) ; Roberts, supra.
State v. Roberts 973 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
[7] See State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), ( ).
State of Louisiana v. Fay v. Perez, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Louis, 94-0761, pp. 7-10, (La.11/30/94), - 49.
State v. Perez 939 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Louis, 94-0761, pp. 7-10, (La.11/30/94), -49 .
State v. Keener 939 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), .
State ex rel. Wells v. State 930 So. 2d 3 La. 2006
See generally State v. Louis, 94-0761, pp. 10-14 (La.ll/3Q/94), -51 ; see also R.S.
State v. Lewis 930 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Givens, 99-3518, p. 14 (La.1/17/01), ; State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 7 (La.11/30/94)
State of Louisiana v. Steven R. Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Thomas 924 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Louis, 94-0761, pp. 7-10, (La.11/30/94), -49 .
State v. Peyrefitte 885 So. 2d 530 La. 2004
: The values that underlie commercial contract law, and that govern the relations between economic actors, are not coextensive with those that underlie the [D]ue Process Clause, and that govern relations between criminal defendants and the State.
State v. Adams 884 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
See State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 7 (La.11/30/94), ( ).
State of Louisiana v. Corey Marquee Adams, Whitney Batiste, and Horatio Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
See State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 7 (La.11/30/94), ( State 3 v. Lewis, ).
State ex rel. Payne v. State 828 So. 2d 1113 La. 2002
844 , (1961); see also State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 10-14 (La.11/30/94), -51 .
State v. Heard 823 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Givens, supra ; citing State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), .
State v. Roberts 822 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In State v. Louis, 94-0761, pp. 7-8 and 10 (La.11/30/94), , 1148 and 1149, appears the following: In determining the validity of agreements not to prosecute or of plea agreements, the courts generally refer to rules of contract law.
State v. Canada 838 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), , 1148 and 1149 appears the following: In determining the validity of agreements not to prosecute or of plea agreements, the courts generally refer to rules of contract law.
State v. Robinson 807 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Defendant relies in brief on two criminal cases dealing with the breach of a plea agreement: State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), , and State v. Bishop, 96-694 (La.App.
Rebouche v. Harvey 805 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), .
State v. Meredith 796 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), .
Vignette Publications, Inc. v. Harborview Enterprises, Inc. 799 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Louis , 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), .
State v. Byrnside 795 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
See e.g., State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), .
State v. Givens 776 So. 2d 443 La. 2001
See State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 7 (La.11/30/94), ( (La.
State v. Walker 747 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
In State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), , the supreme court held that contractual principles may be helpful by analogy in deciding disputes involving plea agreements.
State v. Falls 735 So. 2d 628 La. 1999
See State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94)
State v. Anthony 735 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94), .
State v. Hennis 734 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
[3] In State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the following: In determining the validity of agreements not to prosecute or of plea agreements, the courts generally refer to rules of contract law.