Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jamison, 644 So. 2d 631.

38 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana in the Interest of M.G. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
    10/ 7/ 94), citing Michigan v. Lucas, 500 U.S. 145, 149, 111 S. Ct. 1743, 1746, 114 L.Ed.2d 205 ( 1991) ( upholding the constitutionality of the notice and hearing requirements of Michigan' s rape shield statute, even though such requirements may diminish a criminal defendant' s right to present relevant evidence).
  • State v. Lampley 265 So. 3d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    10/7/94), , the second circuit explained that "[t]he rules of Prieur were not meant to be used as additional, technical procedures sacramental to a valid conviction" ( , 597 (La.
  • State v. Moody 178 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    3rd Cir.5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1437 (La.10/7/94), .
  • State v. Moore 128 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    App.2d Cir.05/04/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/07/94), .
  • State v. Stephens 114 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    40:967(A)(1); State v. Gladney, 29,791 (La.App.2d Cir.9/24/97), ; State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir.5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), .
  • State of Louisiana v. K.W. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Delaney 965 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    10/7/94), , the accused sought to introduce medical records showing that the "young victim already had inappropriate knowledge of certain sexual activities."
  • State of Louisiana v. Samuel Delaney La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    10/7/94), the accused sought to introduce 16 medical records showing that the “young victim already had inappropriate knowledge of certain sexual activities.” Id.
  • Loyton Courville, Et Ux. v. Ford Motor Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    This court makes such a finding just as the court in Myers v. American Seating Company, 93-1350 (1st Cir. 5/20/94), [, writs denied, 94-1569, 94-1633 (La.10/7/94), ], found a folding chair in and of itself was not unreasonably dangerous but the use of the chair, i.e., standing on the rear portion of it thereby causing it to jackknife, was not a reasonably anticipated use given the obvious danger of such a use.
  • Distinguished State v. Gibbs 935 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    3d Cir.12/30/05), ; and State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir.5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Sammie Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Davis 918 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    2 Cir. 5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    2 Cir. 5/4/94), writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), the Second Circuit explained that “the rules of Prieur were not meant to be used as additional, technical procedures sacramental to a valid conviction” and noted that substantial compliance with Prieur is all that is required.
  • State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    2 Cir. 5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), , the Second Circuit explained that "the rules of Prieur were not meant to be used as additional, technical procedures sacramental to a valid conviction" and noted that substantial compliance with Prieur is all that is required.
  • State v. Odle 834 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 5/4/94) , , writ denied, 94-1439 (La.10/7/94)
  • State v. Allen 830 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 5/4/84); , writ denied, 94-1439 (La.10/7/94); ).
  • Lyons v. JA Auger, Inc. 821 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    1 Cir. 5/20/94) , , writ denied 94-1569, 94-1633 (La.10/7/94), , 632.
  • State v. Temple 806 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    2 Cir. 5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), , the *710 Second Circuit explained that "the rules of Prieur were not meant to be used as additional, technical procedures sacramental to a valid conviction" and noted that substantial compliance with Prieur is all that is required.
  • State v. Kinsel 783 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 5/4/94) , , writ denied, 94-1437 (La.10/7/94), .
  • State v. Stanley 780 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    40:967A(1); State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir.05/04/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/07/94), .
  • State v. Stanley 780 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    40:967A(1); State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir.05/04/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/07/94), .
  • McNeely v. Ford Motor Co., Inc. 763 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    1 Cir. 5/20/94), -79 , writs denied, 94-1569, 94-1633 (La.10/7/94), , 632.
  • State v. Hotoph 750 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    3rd Cir.5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1437 (La.10/7/94), .
  • State v. Thomas 745 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    40:967 A(l); State v. Gladney, supra; State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir.5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), ; (La.App.
  • Robin v. Mississippi Fast Freight Co. 744 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    1 Cir. 5/20/94); , writs denied, 94-1569, 94-1633 (La.10/7/94); , 632.
  • State ex rel. A.A.S. 711 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 5/4/94) , , writ denied 94-1439 (La.10/7/94), , and citations therein.
  • State v. Gladney 700 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    40:967 A(1); State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir. 05/04/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/07/94), ; (La.App.
  • State v. King 692 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    App. 3 Cir. 5/4/94); , writ denied, 94-1439 (La.10/7/94); , this circuit upheld a twenty-year sentence where the defendant was convicted of attempted aggravated rape against his minor stepdaughter.
  • State v. Wright 690 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    3 Cir. 5/4/94); , writ denied, 94-1439 (La.10/7/94); .
  • Dunne v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 679 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Viree 670 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Sturdivant 669 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Stacy 665 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Davis 664 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    10/7/94); , this court applied the rape shield law to a case where the defendant wanted to introduce medical records "to establish that the young victim already had inappropriate knowledge of certain sexual activities in March of 1988, and that this knowledge and the alleged sexual abuse was possibly a result of the victim's bi
  • State v. Bailey 664 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Young 660 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Delphen v. Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 657 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    10/7/94), & 94-1633 (La.
  • Scantlin v. State Farm Ins. Co. 652 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    1st Cir.), writs denied, , 632 (La.1994).