Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jamison, 644 So. 2d 631.
-
State Of Louisiana in the Interest of M.G.
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
10/ 7/ 94), citing Michigan v. Lucas, 500 U.S. 145, 149, 111 S. Ct. 1743, 1746, 114 L.Ed.2d 205 ( 1991) ( upholding the constitutionality of the notice and hearing requirements of Michigan' s rape shield statute, even though such requirements may diminish a criminal defendant' s right to present relevant evidence).
-
State v. Lampley
265 So. 3d 799
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/7/94), , the second circuit explained that "[t]he rules of Prieur were not meant to be used as additional, technical procedures sacramental to a valid conviction" ( , 597 (La.
-
State v. Moody
178 So. 3d 1031
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
3rd Cir.5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1437 (La.10/7/94), .
-
State v. Moore
128 So. 3d 608
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
App.2d Cir.05/04/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/07/94), .
-
State v. Stephens
114 So. 3d 1265
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
40:967(A)(1); State v. Gladney, 29,791 (La.App.2d Cir.9/24/97), ; State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir.5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), .
- State of Louisiana v. K.W. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-
State v. Delaney
965 So. 2d 642
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
10/7/94), , the accused sought to introduce medical records showing that the "young victim already had inappropriate knowledge of certain sexual activities."
-
State of Louisiana v. Samuel Delaney
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
10/7/94), the accused sought to introduce 16 medical records showing that the “young victim already had inappropriate knowledge of certain sexual activities.” Id.
-
Loyton Courville, Et Ux. v. Ford Motor Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
This court makes such a finding just as the court in Myers v. American Seating Company, 93-1350 (1st Cir. 5/20/94), [, writs denied, 94-1569, 94-1633 (La.10/7/94), ], found a folding chair in and of itself was not unreasonably dangerous but the use of the chair, i.e., standing on the rear portion of it thereby causing it to jackknife, was not a reasonably anticipated use given the obvious danger of such a use.
-
Distinguished
State v. Gibbs
935 So. 2d 349
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
3d Cir.12/30/05), ; and State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir.5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), .
- State of Louisiana v. Sammie Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
State v. Davis
918 So. 2d 1186
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
2 Cir. 5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), .
-
State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
2 Cir. 5/4/94), writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), the Second Circuit explained that “the rules of Prieur were not meant to be used as additional, technical procedures sacramental to a valid conviction” and noted that substantial compliance with Prieur is all that is required.
-
State v. Willis
915 So. 2d 365
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
2 Cir. 5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), , the Second Circuit explained that "the rules of Prieur were not meant to be used as additional, technical procedures sacramental to a valid conviction" and noted that substantial compliance with Prieur is all that is required.
-
State v. Odle
834 So. 2d 483
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 5/4/94) , , writ denied, 94-1439 (La.10/7/94)
-
State v. Allen
830 So. 2d 606
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 5/4/84); , writ denied, 94-1439 (La.10/7/94); ).
-
Lyons v. JA Auger, Inc.
821 So. 2d 536
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
1 Cir. 5/20/94) , , writ denied 94-1569, 94-1633 (La.10/7/94), , 632.
-
State v. Temple
806 So. 2d 697
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
2 Cir. 5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), , the *710 Second Circuit explained that "the rules of Prieur were not meant to be used as additional, technical procedures sacramental to a valid conviction" and noted that substantial compliance with Prieur is all that is required.
-
State v. Kinsel
783 So. 2d 532
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
3 Cir. 5/4/94) , , writ denied, 94-1437 (La.10/7/94), .
-
State v. Stanley
780 So. 2d 1207
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
40:967A(1); State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir.05/04/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/07/94), .
-
State v. Stanley
780 So. 2d 1207
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
40:967A(1); State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir.05/04/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/07/94), .
-
McNeely v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.
763 So. 2d 659
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1 Cir. 5/20/94), -79 , writs denied, 94-1569, 94-1633 (La.10/7/94), , 632.
-
State v. Hotoph
750 So. 2d 1036
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
3rd Cir.5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1437 (La.10/7/94), .
-
State v. Thomas
745 So. 2d 776
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
40:967 A(l); State v. Gladney, supra; State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir.5/4/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/7/94), ; (La.App.
-
Robin v. Mississippi Fast Freight Co.
744 So. 2d 42
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
1 Cir. 5/20/94); , writs denied, 94-1569, 94-1633 (La.10/7/94); , 632.
-
State ex rel. A.A.S.
711 So. 2d 319
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 5/4/94) , , writ denied 94-1439 (La.10/7/94), , and citations therein.
-
State v. Gladney
700 So. 2d 575
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
40:967 A(1); State v. Lee, 25,917 (La.App.2d Cir. 05/04/94), , writ denied, 94-1451 (La.10/07/94), ; (La.App.
-
State v. King
692 So. 2d 1296
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
App. 3 Cir. 5/4/94); , writ denied, 94-1439 (La.10/7/94); , this circuit upheld a twenty-year sentence where the defendant was convicted of attempted aggravated rape against his minor stepdaughter.
-
State v. Wright
690 So. 2d 850
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
3 Cir. 5/4/94); , writ denied, 94-1439 (La.10/7/94); .
- Dunne v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 679 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- State v. Viree 670 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- State v. Sturdivant 669 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- State v. Stacy 665 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
-
State v. Davis
664 So. 2d 821
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
10/7/94); , this court applied the rape shield law to a case where the defendant wanted to introduce medical records "to establish that the young victim already had inappropriate knowledge of certain sexual activities in March of 1988, and that this knowledge and the alleged sexual abuse was possibly a result of the victim's bi
- State v. Bailey 664 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
- State v. Young 660 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
-
Delphen v. Dept. of Transp. & Dev.
657 So. 2d 328
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
10/7/94), & 94-1633 (La.
-
Scantlin v. State Farm Ins. Co.
652 So. 2d 640
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
1st Cir.), writs denied, , 632 (La.1994).