Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Green, 655 So. 2d 272.
-
State v. McArthur
702 So. 2d 1047
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Green, 94-887 (La.5/22/95); (footnotes omitted), has stated the following with respect to Batson challenges: In Batson the Supreme Court adopted a three-step analysis to determine whether the constitutional rights of prospective jurors *1057 have been infringed by impermissible discriminatory practices: First, the defendant must make a prim
-
State v. Brown
702 So. 2d 744
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
-
State v. Jackson
707 So. 2d 990
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Batson, supra; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.05/22/95) .
- State v. Bourque 699 So. 2d 1 La. 1997
-
State v. Galliano
696 So. 2d 1043
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
See State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 27 (La.5/22/95); .
-
Lee v. Magnolia Garden Apartments
694 So. 2d 1142
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 25 (La.5/22/95); .
-
State v. Jackson
694 So. 2d 440
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
at 1722-1724 ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
-
State v. Bentley
692 So. 2d 1207
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ; cert.
-
State v. Dugas
691 So. 2d 197
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 23-24 (La.5/22/95), .
- State v. Banks 694 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
-
State v. White
686 So. 2d 96
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
See State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 24 (La.5/22/95); -288 (which sets forth an illustrative listing of facts relevant to the establishment of a prima facie case).
-
State v. McClain
685 So. 2d 590
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
-
State v. Schexnayder
685 So. 2d 357
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
at 1722-1724 ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
-
State v. Seals
684 So. 2d 368
La. 1996
State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
-
State v. Cyriak
684 So. 2d 42
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
-288 (La.1995), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the defendant's burden in establishing a prima facie case of discrimination: The first step in this process places a burden of production or of "going forward" on the defendant.
-
State v. Boddie
683 So. 2d 1246
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
In State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95); (quoting Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 358-59 , 111 S.Ct.
-
State v. Walker
681 So. 2d 1023
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
5/22/95), ; State v. English, supra.
- State v. Caldwell 679 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
-
State v. Joe
678 So. 2d 586
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
5/22/95), , the court held that the state waived its right to complain by not contemporaneously objecting to the untimeliness of the defendant's Batson challenge.
-
State v. Tart
672 So. 2d 116
La. 1996
5/22/95), , citing Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 358-359 , 111 S.Ct.
- State v. Bolden 680 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
-
State v. Durham
673 So. 2d 1103
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
-
State v. Prout
672 So. 2d 933
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
5/22/95) , 287-290: In Batson the Supreme Court adopted a three-step analysis to determine whether the constitutional rights of prospective jurors have been infringed by impermissible discriminatory practices: First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the prosecutor has exercised peremptory challenges on the ba
- State v. Jones 668 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996