Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Green, 655 So. 2d 272.

274 citing documents.

  • State v. McArthur 702 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Green, 94-887 (La.5/22/95); (footnotes omitted), has stated the following with respect to Batson challenges: In Batson the Supreme Court adopted a three-step analysis to determine whether the constitutional rights of prospective jurors *1057 have been infringed by impermissible discriminatory practices: First, the defendant must make a prim
  • State v. Brown 702 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Jackson 707 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Batson, supra; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.05/22/95) .
  • State v. Bourque 699 So. 2d 1 La. 1997
  • State v. Galliano 696 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    See State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 27 (La.5/22/95); .
  • Lee v. Magnolia Garden Apartments 694 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 25 (La.5/22/95); .
  • State v. Jackson 694 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    at 1722-1724 ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Bentley 692 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ; cert.
  • State v. Dugas 691 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 23-24 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Banks 694 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State v. White 686 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    See State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 24 (La.5/22/95); -288 (which sets forth an illustrative listing of facts relevant to the establishment of a prima facie case).
  • State v. McClain 685 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Schexnayder 685 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    at 1722-1724 ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Seals 684 So. 2d 368 La. 1996
    State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Cyriak 684 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    -288 (La.1995), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the defendant's burden in establishing a prima facie case of discrimination: The first step in this process places a burden of production or of "going forward" on the defendant.
  • State v. Boddie 683 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    In State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95); (quoting Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 358-59 , 111 S.Ct.
  • State v. Walker 681 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    5/22/95), ; State v. English, supra.
  • State v. Caldwell 679 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Joe 678 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    5/22/95), , the court held that the state waived its right to complain by not contemporaneously objecting to the untimeliness of the defendant's Batson challenge.
  • State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
    5/22/95), , citing Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 358-359 , 111 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bolden 680 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Durham 673 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
  • State v. Prout 672 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    5/22/95) , 287-290: In Batson the Supreme Court adopted a three-step analysis to determine whether the constitutional rights of prospective jurors have been infringed by impermissible discriminatory practices: First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the prosecutor has exercised peremptory challenges on the ba
  • State v. Jones 668 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996