Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Green, 655 So. 2d 272.

274 citing documents.

State v. Anderson 786 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Batson, supra; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.05/22/95), .
State v. Bourgeois 786 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
1859, 1866 , 114 L.Ed.2d 395 (1991); State v. Green, 94-887 (La.5/22/95), .
State v. Pena 788 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 23 (La.5/22/95), (quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 94 , 106 S.Ct.
State v. Adams 779 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ; (La.App.
State v. Givens 776 So. 2d 443 La. 2001
In State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 25 (La.5/22/95), , this court held that the sole focus of the Batson inquiry is upon the intent of the prosecutor at the time he exercised his peremptory strikes.
State v. Bryant 775 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.05/22/95), .
State v. Quest 772 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
In State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court considered the Defendant's criminal history and repeated exposure to his Miranda rights in determining that the Defendant understood his rights for purposes of giving a free and voluntary statement.
State v. Jones 767 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Myers, 99-1803 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
(Citing State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ).
State v. Womack-Grey 764 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95), .
State v. Wade 758 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
*993 Batson, supra; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.05/22/95), .
State v. Collor 762 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Hall, 98-0667, p. 11 (La.App.
State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
State v. Myers 761 So. 2d 498 La. 2000
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, relying on State v. Green, 94-0887 *500 (La.5/22/95), , affirmed the conviction holding defendant failed to make a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination because "[t]here is no proof in the record that the rejection of [the] six potential jurors was in any way predicated upon race."
State v. Thompson 758 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Fisher, supra ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
State v. Coleman 756 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Batson, supra; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Jackson, 29,470 (La.App.2d Cir.8/20/97), .
State v. Taylor 757 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Normand 98-1312 at p.7, 735 So.2d at 905 ; State v. Green, 94-0887, p.11 (La.5/22/95), .
State v. Bourque 757 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Green, 94-887 (La.5/22/95); .
State v. Hall 750 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95), , citing State v. Brooks, 92-3331, p. 10 (La.1/17/95), .
State v. Ball 748 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Hobley 752 So. 2d 771 La. 1999
1769, 1771 , 131 L.Ed.2d 834 (1995)(per curiam); State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 23 (La.5/22/95), .
State v. Gilliam 748 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 8 (La.5/22/95), n. 7 .
State v. Givens 750 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
State v. Harrison 743 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Batson, supra ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.05/22/95), .
State in Interest of JM 743 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
In State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), , the accused was a juvenile tried in criminal district court.
State v. Normand 735 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
2830, 2834 , 77 L.Ed.2d 405 (1983); State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Dunn, 94-776 (La.App.
State v. Watts 735 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 *870 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Johnson, 97-867 (La.App.
State v. Myers 737 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Jackson, 96-661 (La.App.
State v. Touissant 734 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
See State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 28 (La.5/22/95), , and cases cited therein.
State v. Martin 730 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ; (La.App.
State v. Gibbs 728 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
In State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), , the supreme court opined that a defendant could make out a prima facie case of racial discrimination by offering facts such as: [A] pattern of strikes by a prosecutor against members of a suspect class, statements or actions of the prosecutor which *949 support an inference that the exercise of peremptory strikes wa
State v. Jones 729 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Durham , 94-1036 (La.App.
State v. Brown 753 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
State v. Davis 727 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
In State v. Green, 94-0887, (La.5/22/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed Batson's three-step analysis to determine whether a constitutional violation occurred: First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the prosecutor has exercised peremptory challenges on the basis of race.
State v. Brumfield 737 So. 2d 660 La. 1998
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95); .
State v. Shelvin 720 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
“Miranda also made it clear that for such a statement to be admissible it must be made with a knowing and intelligent waiver of those rights.” State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 10 (La.5/22/95); .
State v. Fugler 721 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
In State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 8 at n. 7, (La.5/22/95), , 279 at n. 7, contrary to the holding in Glover , the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that an essential prerequisite for suppressing a confession or statement on voluntariness grounds under the due process clause of the United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment is misconduct or overreaching by the police.
State v. Fisher 720 So. 2d 1179 La. 1998
[3] State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95); .
State v. Tyler 723 So. 2d 939 La. 1998
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 9
State v. Lecoq 717 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Davis, 95-1059, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Tolbert 716 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
1558 , 137 L.Ed.2d 705 (1997); State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.05/22/95), ; State v. Thomas, 28,790 (La.App.
State v. Woods 713 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
See State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 27 (La.5/22/95), .
State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
See State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 25 (La.5/22/95), (applying Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352 , 111 S.Ct.
State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
at 1722-1724 ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), .
State v. Sanders 717 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Green, 94-887 (La.5/22/95), (footnotes omitted), *243 has stated the following with respect to Batson challenges: In Batson the Supreme Court adopted a three-step analysis to determine whether the constitutional rights of prospective jurors have been infringed by impermissible discriminatory practices: First, the defendant must make a prima faci
State v. Robertson 712 So. 2d 8 La. 1998
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 23-24 (La.5/22/95), -88 .
State v. McCorkle 708 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
2830 , 77 L.Ed.2d 405 (1983); State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Dunn, supra .
State v. Gaspard 709 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95); .
State v. Hammond 706 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
[2] The Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), , neutrally observed that the court in Martin "seized upon LSA-R.S.