Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ellis, 657 So. 2d 341.

34 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Roman Ford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5 Cir. 5/30/95), the court noted that “[t]he questions of relevancy and admissibility are within the wide discretion of the trial judge.
State v. Ford 217 So. 3d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5 Cir. 5/30/95), , the court noted that “[t]he questions of relevancy and admissibility are within the wide discretion of the trial judge.
State v. Miller 160 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Hamdan 131 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 5/30/95), *207 357 .
State of Louisiana v. Albert L. Arnold La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
5 Cir.5/30/95), writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), and 95-1639 (La.1/5/96)
State v. Arnold 124 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir.5/30/95), , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), and 95-1639 (La.1/5/96), .
State v. Lang 128 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 5/30/95), , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), , and 95-1639 (La.1/5/96), .
State v. Henry 119 So. 3d 713 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 5/30/95) ; , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95); , and 95-1639 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Randall C. Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 5/30/95), writs denied, 95–2095 (La.12/8/95), and 95–1639 (La.1
State v. Thompson 111 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 5/30/95) , , units denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), and 95-1639 (La.1) [(La.)], .
State v. AUGUILLARD 997 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 5/30/95) , , writ denied, 95-2095 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Russell J. Auguillard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 5/30/95), writ denied, 95-2095 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Sammy D. Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5 Cir.5/30/95), writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), and 95-1639 (La.1/5/96)
State v. Smith 974 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5 Cir.5/30/95), , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), and 95-1639 (La.1/5/96), .
State v. Galliano 945 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
App. 5 Cir. 5/30/95), , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), and 95-1639 (La.
State v. Tauzin 880 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
5th Cir.5/30/95), , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), , and 95-1639 (La.1/5/96), .
State v. Barton 857 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 5/30/95) , , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), and 95-1639 (La.1/5/96), .
State v. Fleming 820 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 5/30/95) , , writs denied; 95-2095 (La.
State v. Jackson 778 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
5 Cir.5/30/95), , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), , and 95-1639 (La.1/5/96), .
State v. Interest of WTB 771 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
5th Cir. 5/30/95), , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), and 95-1639 (La.1/5/96) .
State v. Hotoph 750 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Henderson 746 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir.5/30/95), , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), , 95-1639 (La.1/5/96), .
State v. Zeno 742 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5 Cir.5/30/95), , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), and 95-1639 (La.1/5/96), .
State v. McKnight 739 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
5 Cir. 5/30/95); , writ denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95); and 95-1639 (La.1/5/96); .
State v. Anderson 732 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
5th Cir.5/30/95), , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), and 95-1639 (La.1/5/96), .
State v. Russell 726 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 5/30/95), , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), , 95-1639 (La.1/5/96), .
Tritt v. Gares 735 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 5/30/95); , writ denied 95-2095 (La.12/8/95); , and writ denied by 95-1639 (La.1/5/96); , also cited by the plaintiffs, fails to support the plaintiffs contention that the Insley affidavit alone is sufficient to establish a prima facie case of conspiracy: In the instant case, the evidence the st
State v. Zapata 713 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 5/30/95) , , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), , 95-1639 (La.1/5/96), .
State v. Gibson 708 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
App. 5 Cir. 5/30/95), , writ denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), , 95-1639 (La.1/5/96), .
State v. Bailey 703 So. 2d 1325 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
5 Cir. 5/30/95) , , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), , 95-1639 (La.1/5/96), .
State v. Joseph 685 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
5 Cir. 5/30/95) , , writ denied, 95-2095 (La.12/8/95), , writ denied, 95-1639 (La.1/5/96), .
State v. Lassere 683 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
5th Cir. 5/30/95), , writ denied, 95-1639 (La.1/5/96), .
State v. Rivers 681 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
5th Cir. 05/30/95), , writs denied, 95-2095 (La.12/08/95), , 95-1639 (La.
State v. Clark 670 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
5 Cir. 5/30/95), , the court noted that “[t]he questions of relevancy and admissibility are within the wide discretion of the trial judge.