Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 666 So. 2d 1073.

125 citing documents.

Jena Rougeau v. Hospital Service District 2 of Beauregard Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
1/29/96), on reh’g on other grounds, 95-939 (La.
Alisa Alan Durkheimer v. Tranise L. Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Kimberly Brooke Labauve, Et Al. v. Louisiana La. 2022
Teresa Jeffries v. Prime Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
1/129/96), Massie v. Cenac Towing Co., Inc., 00-1596 (La.App.
David Rhodes Versus Amko Fence and Steel Company, LLC, and Evergreen La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
art. 702, comment (d); Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96)
Glenn M. Hebert v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Shawn Copell v. Arceneaux Ford, Inc. and Amtrust North America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
1/29/96), on rehearing on other grounds, 95-939 (La.
Gladys S. Gautreaux Versus West Jefferson Medical Center La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Newman v. LSU Health Sciences Center Shreveport 223 So. 3d 116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
01/29/96), , opinion reinstated on reh’g, 95-0939 (La.
Morris v. Rainwater 218 So. 3d 226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
1/29/96), , opinion reinstated on reh’g, 95-0939 (La.
Volentine v. Raeford Farms of Louisiana, LLC 201 So. 3d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), , opinion rein stated on reh’g, 95-0939 (La.11/25/96), .
Tangela Annette Brown v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 3/5/03), writs denied, 03-1380, 03- 1385 (La.9/19/03), Mistich v. Volkswagon of Germany, Inc., 95-939 (La.1/29/96), on rehearing on other grounds, 95-939 (La.11/25/96), Massie v. Cenac Towing Co., Inc., 00-1596 (La.App.
Brown v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles, LLC 104 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 3/5/03) , , writs denied, 03-1380, 03-1385 (La.9/19/03), , 645; Mistich v. Volkswagon [Volkswagen ] of Germany, Inc., 95-939 (La.1/29/96), , on rehearing on other grounds, 95-939 (La.11/25/96), ; Massie v. Cenac Towing Co., Inc., 00-1596 (La.App.
Dixon v. Tucker 92 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.01/29/96), .
Interstate Realty Management Co. v. Price 86 So. 3d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
(citing Stobart, supra at 883 ; Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93-2661 (La.7/5/94), ; Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), ).
Harper v. Minor 86 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.01/29/96), ; Johnson v. English, 34,322 (La.App.2d Cir.12/20/00), .
Powell v. Chabanais Concrete Pumping, Inc. 82 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
Starr v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation & Development 70 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.01/29/96), .
Price Farms, Inc. v. McCurdy 42 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
Virginia Peoples, Et Ux. v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
1/29/96), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that “[a] trial judge has wide discretion in determining whether to allow a witness to testify as an expert, and his judgment will not be disturbed by an appellate court unless it is clearly erroneous.” In accepting Mr. Frenzel as an expert witness, the trial court n
Peoples v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. 38 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
ce Article 702 provides that “[i]f scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.” In Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-939, p. 8 (La.1/29/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that “[a] trial judge has wide discretion in determining whethe
Nancy Taylor v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
1/29/96), on rehearing on other grounds, 95-939 (La.
Taylor v. Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. 33 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 3/5/03) , , writs denied, 03-1380, 03-1385 (La.9/19/03), , 645; Mistich v. Volkswagon of Germany, Inc., 95-939 (La.1/29/96), , on rehearing on other grounds, 95-939 (La.11/25/96), ; Massie v. Cenac Towing Co., Inc., 00-1596 (La.App.
Forbes v. METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER 35 So. 3d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
Harvey Canal Ltd. Partnership v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 39 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1/29/96), ; Pyles v. Weaver, 06-0348 (La.App.
Tida Rose Bourgeois v. Brown's Market & Deli, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Bourgeois v. Brown's Deli & Market, Inc. 21 So. 3d 1072 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
Versluis v. GULF COAST TRANSIT CO. 17 So. 3d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Isffce Mistich v. Volkswagon of Germany, 95-0939, p. 8 (La.1/29/96), .
Todd v. Delta Queen Steamboat Co. 15 So. 3d 107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 4/25/01) , ; Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), ).
Womack v. CUSTOM HOMES AND RENOVATIONS 12 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, pp. 4-5, (La.1/29/96), , our Supreme Court stated as follows: It is a well settled principle that an appellate court may not set aside a trial court’s finding of fact unless it is clearly wrong.
Willis v. Smith 999 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), ; Johnson v. English, 34,322 (La.App.
Devall v. Baton Rouge Fire Department 979 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
art. 702, comment (d); Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), ; Mitchell, 666 So.2d at 729 .
Oreman v. Oreman 971 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
art. 702; Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), ; Boone v. Boone, 39,544 (La.App.
Pyles v. Weaver 958 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
See Mistich v. Volkswagon of Germany, 95-0939, p. 8 (La.1/29/96), .
Holzenthal v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 950 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, p. 8 (La.1/29/96), .
Holzenthal v. SEWERAGE & WATER BD. OF NO 950 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, p. 8 (La.1/29/96), .
Raiford v. U.S. Industries/Ames Lawn & Garden Tools 929 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
In Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that “[tjrial judges are allowed much discretion in determining whether or not to allow a person whose location is unknown during the pendency of trial and who appears shortly before trial to testify.” 666 So.2d at 1079 .
Raiford v. US INDUSTRIES/AMES LAWN 929 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
In Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that "[t]rial judges are allowed much discretion in determining whether or not to allow a person whose location is unknown during the pendency of trial and who appears shortly before trial to testify."
Orleans Sheet Metal Works & Roofing, Inc. v. Rabito 916 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc. 95-0939, (La.1/29/96), .
Lam Ex Rel. Lam v. State Farm Auto. Ins. 901 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 4/1/98), , citing Mistich v. Volkswagon of Germany, Inc. 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), ; also see, Williamson v. Haynes Best Western of Alexandria, 95-1725 (La.App.
Charles B. Ashy, Sr. v. William E. Trotter, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Ashy v. Trotter 888 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
See Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
Night & Day Partners, Ltd. v. Great American Real Food Fast, Inc. 876 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
See also Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), ; Harvey v. Cole, 2000-1849 (La.App.
Craige v. Broome 869 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
4th Cir.1/23/02), -776 , this Court stated: The standard of appellate review of a trial court's findings of facts was enunciated in Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, pp. 4-5 (La.1/29/96), , as follows: It is a well settled principle that an appellate court may not set aside a trial court's finding of fact unless it is clearly wrong.
Young v. Fitzpatrick 865 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
Cornelia E. Young v. Kevin Fitzpatrick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96)
Johnson v. Melton 867 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 4/1/98), , citing Mistich v. Volkswagon of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
Sanford v. City of New Orleans 866 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
See also Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, (La.1/29/96), ; Harvey v. Cole, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
Fredy Rivera-Santos v. Ada Elba Melendez Rivera-Santos La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
the trial court in cases involving expert witnesses as follows: “A trial judge has wide discretion in determining whether to allow a 7 witness to testify as an expert, and his judgment will not be disturbed by an appellate court unless it is clearly erroneous.” Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, p.8 (La.1/29/96)
Rivera-Santos v. Rivera-Santos 862 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, p. 8 (La.1/29/96); .