DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 666 So. 2d 1073.

125 citing documents.

  • Quinn v. GGS, L.L.C. 862 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    1/29/96), ; Tortorich v. Otis Elevator Co., Inc., 02-275 (La.App.
  • Dehart v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad 860 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    5 Cir. 10/16/02) , , citing Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
  • Bruce A. Baker v. Mazda Motor of America La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    ½9/96), the supreme court noted, “[f]ormal education or training in a particular field is not always necessary to qualify as an expert in a particular field.
  • Baker v. Mazda Motor of America 856 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    art. 702, which states: “[i]f scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.” In Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, p. 8 (La.1/29/96), , the supreme court noted, “[fjormal education or training in a particular field is not always necessary
  • Coffey v. Mushatt 859 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, pp. 4-5, (La.1/29/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated as follows: It is a well settled principle that an appellate court may not set aside a trial court’s finding of fact unless it is clearly wrong.
  • Tadlock v. Taylor 857 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 4/1/98), (citing Mistich v. Volkswagon of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), ).
  • Boutte v. Kelly 863 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
  • Pelleteri v. Caspian Group Inc. 851 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    See also Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), ; Harvey v. Cole, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
  • Gulf Outlet Marina, Inc. v. Spain 854 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 7/12/00) , ; Mistich v. Volkswagen, 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
  • National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Harrington 854 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    In Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, p. 8 (La.1/29/96), , the supreme court noted, "[f]ormal education or training in a particular field is not always necessary to qualify as an expert in a particular field.
  • Davis v. American Home Products Corp. 844 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    See Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
  • Cleland v. City of Lake Charles 840 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Mistich v. Volkswagon of Germany, Inc., 95-939 (La.1/29/96); , on rehearing on other grounds, 95-939 (La.11/25/96); ; Massie v. Cenac Towing Co., Inc., 00-1596 (La.App.
  • Kirklin v. Joseph 839 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    4th Cir.1/23/02), , this Court stated: The standard of appellate review of a trial court’s findings of facts was enunciated in Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, pp. 4-5 (La.1/29/96), , as follows: It is a well settled principle that an appellate court may not set aside a trial court’s finding of fact unless it is clearly wrong.
  • Amoco Production Co. v. Texaco, Inc. 838 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), ; (La.App.
  • Tortorich v. Otis Elevator Co., Inc. 831 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
  • Bergeron v. STATE BOXING 829 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), ; Clement v. Griffin, 91-1664 (La.App.
  • Kunofsky v. Davie Shoring, Inc. 828 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, pp. 4-5, (La.1/29/96), , our Supreme Court stated as follows: It is a well settled principle that an appellate court may not set aside a trial court’s finding of fact unless it is clearly wrong.
  • Carey v. Rao 828 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
  • Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Chrysler Corp. 834 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    See Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
  • Doe v. Archdiocese of New Orleans 823 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 4/1/98), , citing Mistich v. Volkswagon of Germany, Inc., 95-0939(La.1/29/96), .
  • Darbone v. State 815 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-939, p. 8 (La.1/29/96); .
  • Wiley v. City of New Orleans 809 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc. 95-0939, (La.1/29/96), .
  • Harvey v. Cole 808 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of appellate review of a trial court's findings of facts was enunciated in Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, pp. 4-5 (La.1/29/96), , as follows: *776 It is a well settled principle that an appellate court may not set aside a trial court's finding of fact unless it is clearly wrong.
  • Bonnette v. Conoco, Inc. 801 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Mistich v. Volkswagen, 95-0939 (La.1/29/96); ; (La.
  • Estay v. Terminal Stevedores, Inc. 806 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    The admission of experts is within the sound discretion of the trial judge, and such determinations will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion, Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
  • Bertrand v. Henry 815 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.01/29/96), .
  • Brandon v. Trosclair 800 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 3/14/01), , writ denied XXXX-XXXX (La.6/22/01), , citing Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
  • Stiltner v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. 798 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 4/25/01), ; Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc. 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
  • White v. Austin 798 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, pp. 4-5 (La.1/29/96), , our Supreme Court set forth the standard of appellate review of a trial court’s factual findings as follows: It is a well settled principle that an appellate court may not set aside a trial court’s finding of fact unless it is clearly wrong.
  • Davis v. Martel 790 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 p. 9, (La.1/29/96); .
  • Williams v. Regional Transit Authority/Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana 788 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc. 95-0939, (La.1/29/96), .
  • Abshire v. Wilkenson 787 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, p. 8 (La.1/29/96); .
  • Massie v. Cenac Towing Co., Inc. 796 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-939, p. 8 (La.1/29/96); , on rehearing on other grounds, 95-939 (La.11/25/96); .
  • Newman v. Fernwood Transportation 785 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc. 95-0939, (La.1/29/96), .
  • Bond v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 782 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “A trial judge has wide discretion in determining whether to allow a witness to testify as an expert, and his judgment will not be disturbed by an appellate court unless it is clearly erroneous.” Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany Inc., 95-0939, p. 8 (La.1/29/96); , on rehearing on other grounds, 95-0939 (La.11/25/96); .
  • Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RR 786 So. 2d 682 La. 2001
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
  • Daniels v. Burridge 785 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, (La.1/29/96), .
  • Schwartz v. Liberty Lloyds Insurance Co. 786 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .
  • Pontiff v. Pecot & Associates Rehabilitation & Physical Therapy Services, Inc. 780 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95 0939 (La.1/29/96), ; on remand, (La.App.
  • Johnson v. English 779 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), ; Hunter v. Bossier Medical Center, 31,026 (La.App.2d Cir.9/25/98), ; Breeden v. Valencia, Inc., (La.App.
  • Becnel v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 773 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), , 1079 citing Aaron v. Bankers and Shippers Ins.
  • Darbonne v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 774 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Mistich v. Volkswagen, 95-0939 (La.1/29/96); ; (La.
  • In Re Succession of Burguieres 802 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, at 5 (La.1/29/96), .
  • Collins v. State ex rel. Louisiana Health Care Authority 774 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Mistich v. Volkswagen, 95-0939 (La.1/29/96) .
  • Succession of Shamsie 759 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany Inc., 95-0939 (La.1996), .
  • Foster v. Clarendon Nat. Ins. 753 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    *975 DISCUSSION In Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95 0939 (La.1/29/96), , the supreme court explained that findings of fact are allocated to the trial courts.
  • Currie v. Myers 750 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of *392 Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.01/29/96), .
  • Clark v. Natt 748 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.01/29/96), .
  • DeLoach v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 743 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, 95-0939 (La.01/29/96), .
  • Courteaux v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. 745 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    The wide latitude granted to a trial court in deciding to credit or disregard expert testimony is reflected in the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939 (La.1/29/96), .