Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vaughan v. Hair, 650 So. 2d 1186.

19 citing documents.

Wade Conner v. Klarc Lemelle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3/10/95), Alford v. State Farm Auto.
Gordon R. Sibley and wife, Carolyn A. Sibley, and Katelyn D. Sibley, a minor by and through, Gordon … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Julia B. Voinche v. Joseph Beaud Capps La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Voinche v. Capps 155 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 10/5/94) , , writ denied, 95-123 (La.3/10/95), ).
Scott Hargrave, Et Ux. v. Cecil J. Delaughter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Hargrave v. Delaughter 10 So. 3d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 10/5/94) , , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95), .
Woolard v. Atkinson 988 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
3rd Cir.10/5/94), , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95), .
Robert v. Lecompte 829 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
des the transportation the employee uses to go to and from work; (2) the employer provides expenses or wages for the time spent traveling in *1202 the vehicle; or (3) if the operation of the motor vehicle is incidental to or is actually the performance of some employment responsibility.” Vaughan v. Hair, 94-86, p. 4 (La.App 3 Cir. 10/5/94); , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95) .
Young v. Mooney 815 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 10/5/94) ; , writ Udenied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95); .
White v. Canonge 811 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 10/5/94) , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95), .
Phipps v. Bruno Const. 773 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
App. 3 Cir. 10/5/94); , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95); , explains the exceptions to the general rule: The jurisprudence has outlined three exceptions to the above rule.
Baggett v. Brumfield 758 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 10/5/94) ; , writ denied, 95-123 (La.3/10/95); .
Lacoste v. Crochet 751 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 10/5/94), , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95), .
Sutherland v. Hibernia Corp. 746 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
App. 4th Cir.12/15/94), , writ denied, 95-0125 (La.3/10/95), .
Bell v. Hurstell 743 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
3 Cir. 10/5/94) ; -83 , writ denied 95-0123 (La.3/10/95); , where the court stated that "there is no authority that would prohibit a person [employer] from allowing the consumption of alcoholic beverages on his premises by someone of lawful age."
Washington v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 708 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
3rd Cir.10/5/94), , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95), .
Soileau v. D & J Tire, Inc. 702 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
3 Cir. 10/5/94) ; , writ denied, 95-0123 (La.3/10/95); .
Prestenback v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 688 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
3rd Cir. 12/14/94) , writ denied, 95-0122 (La.3/10/95), the court explained: A plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence the existence of a causal relationship between the accident and the injuries he claims.
Norlander v. Illinois National Insurance Co. 672 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996