DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 666 So. 2d 624.

124 citing documents.

  • Robert L. Manard III PLC v. Falcon Law Firm PLC 119 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, 95-0671 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Holloway Drilling Equipment, Inc. v. Danielle Bodin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Company, 95-654, 95-671, p. 12 (La.1/16/96)
  • Pierrotti v. Johnson 91 So. 3d 1056 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining, Co., 95-0654, 95-0671, p. 12 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Willie J. Zeno, Sr. v. Flowers Baking Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Zeno v. Flowers Baking Co. 62 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Co., 95-654, 95-671, p. 15 (La.1/16/96), ).
  • Michael Fogleman v. Meaux Surface Protection, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Fogleman v. Meaux Surface Protection, Inc. 58 So. 3d 1057 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 12/20/06) , , writ denied, 07-111 (La.3/16/07), ; Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-654, 95-671 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Landry v. Town of Livingston Police Department 54 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining, Co., 95-0654, 95-0671, p. 12 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Morales v. Parish of Jefferson 54 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-654, p. 11 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Estate of Raven v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. 51 So. 3d 147 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, 95-0671, pp. 11-12 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Roger Rivers v. Bo Ezernack Hauling Contractor, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    LSA-RS 13:4231 (West 1991); Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, 95-0671, p. 16 (La.1/16/96)
  • Rivers v. Bo Ezernack Hauling Contractor, LLC 37 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    LSA-RS 13:4231 (West 1991); Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, 95-0671, p. 16 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Hazel Jones v. the Geo Group, Inc. F/K/A Wackenhut La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Co., 95-0654 (La.1/16/96), Bobby and Ray Williams P’ship, L.L.P.
  • Jones Ex Rel. Jones v. GEO Group, Inc. 6 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Co., 95-0654 (La.1/16/96), ; Bobby and Ray Williams P’ship, L.L.P.
  • Antonio J. Velazquez v. Landcoast Insulation, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    1/16/96), on remand, 93-2364 (La.App.
  • Velazquez v. Landcoast Insulation, Inc. 999 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, 95-0671 (La.1/16/96), , on remand, 93-2364 (La.App.
  • Anaya v. Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc. 985 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    In support of this contention Mr. Anaya cites, Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654 (La.1/16/96), , in which the Supreme Court stated: It is implicit in the concept of a judicial system that controversies be finally resolved so that parties may enjoy their rights and so that conflicting legal obligations may not be imposed on an individual; litigation must end at some point.
  • Chevron USA, Inc. v. State 972 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Avenue Plaza, L.L.C. v. Falgoust, 96-0173, p. 6 (La.7/2/96), ; Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, p. 12 (La.1/16/96), ; Peter Wilbert Arbour, Comment, The Louisiana Concept of Res Judicata, 34 La.
  • Bruno v. Bruno 971 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    [1] *354 This court distinguishes Terrebonne Fuel & Lube Inc. v. Placid Refining Company, 95-0654, 95-0671 (La.1/16/96), , which dealt with a judgment that contained a specific exclusion of the claim asserted, therefore barring the application of res judicata.
  • Maureen Green v. Iberia Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    1/16/96), Bobby and Ray Williams P’ship, L.L.P.
  • Green v. Iberia Parish School Board 945 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Co., 95-0654 (La.1/16/96), ; Bobby and Ray Williams P'ship, L.L.P.
  • Classen v. Hofmann 947 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 1/21/04) , , the court summarized recent jurisprudence on res judicata as follows: In Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placed Refining Co., 95-0654, 95-0671 (La.1/16/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the scope of res judicata as follows: Res judicata is an issue preclusion device found both in federal law and in state law.
  • Latiolais v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INS. CO. 949 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube v. Placid Refining, 95-0654, 95-0671, (La.1/16/96); .
  • Hilda Latiolais v. State Farm Mutual Auto ins.co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Cochrane v. Louisiana Tax Com'n 905 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    In Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, 95-0671 (La.1/16/96), , the Louisiana *359 Supreme Court discussed the scope of res judicata as follows: Res judicata is an issue preclusion device found both in federal law and in state law.
  • Schindler v. Orleans Regional Security Institute Inc. 891 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    In so holding, the court recognized that “the principles of res judicata ‘are not ironclad, but rnpst be applied to accomplish justice in the light of public policy.’ ” Id., 732 So.2d at 524 , citing Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, 95-0671 (La.1/16/96), .
  • BOBBY AND RAY WILLIAMS v. Shreveport 882 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654 (La.1/16/96), , (federal res judicata law applied to judgment by court which exercised federal question jurisdiction); Pilie & (federal res judicata law applied to judgment by court which exercised diversity jurisdiction); McCollough v. Dauzat, 98-1293 (La.App.
  • MANDALAY OIL & GAS v. Energy Develop. Corp. 880 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, pp. 11-12 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Tower Partners, L.L.C. v. Wade 869 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placed Refining Co., 95-0654, 95-0671 (La.1/16/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the scope of res judicata as follows: Res judicata is an issue preclusion device found both in federal law and in state law.
  • Shearman v. Asher 851 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Terrebonne Fuel [ & Lube v. Placid Refining, 95-0654, 95-0671, pp. 11-12 (La.1/16/96); ] addressed the amended statute.
  • Lagnion v. State 858 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-654, 95-671, p. 16 (La.1/16/96), , the supreme court recognized that exceptions to the federal doctrine of res judicata exist where “there is an express reservation of claims, when the defendant acquiesces in such a reservation, or when the court in the first action has expressly reserved the plaintiffs right to maintain the second action.” Subs
  • Breaux v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 842 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, 95-0671 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Williams v. City of Marksville 839 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Co., 95-654, p. 11 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Burguieres v. Pollingue 843 So. 2d 1049 La. 2003
    Avenue Plaza, L.L.C. v. Falgoust, 96-0173, p. 6 (La.7/2/96), ; Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, p. 12 (La.1/16/96), ; Peter Wilbert Arbour, Comment, The Louisiana Concept of Res Judicata, 34 La.
  • Diamond B Const. Co., Inc. v. DOTD 845 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Company, 95-0654, 95-0671, pp. 11-12 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Peter Vicari General Contractor, Inc. v. St. Pierre 831 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    Terrebonne Fuel Lube v. Placid Refining, 95-0654, 95-0671, pp. 11-12 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Lycon, Inc. v. Weatherford Artificial Lift Systems 827 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    .Ct. 1191 , 127 L.Ed.2d 541 (1994), our supreme court stated that “[w]hen a state court is required to determine the preclusive effects of a judgment rendered by |4a federal court exercising federal question jurisdiction, it is the federal law of res judicata that must be applied.” Applying federal law in Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-654, 95-671, p. 16 (La.1/16/96), , the supreme court recognized that exceptions to the common law theory of res judicata exist, “such
  • Asbestos v. Borden, Inc. 826 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    As the court in Terrebonne Fuel and Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654 (La.1/16/96), , 632 stated as guidance for reviewing a claim of res judicata: The central inquiry is not whether the second action is based upon the same cause of action, but whether the second action asserts a cause of action which arises out of the transaction or occurrence which was the subject matter of the first action.
  • Mandalay Oil & Gas v. Energy Develop. Corp. 867 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, pp. 11-12 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Owens v. Book 819 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Company, 95-0654, 95-0671, p. 11-12 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Certified Finance, Inc. v. Cunard 838 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, pp. 11-12 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Wagner v. FAIRWAY VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOC. INC. 813 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube v. Placid Refining, 95-0654, 95-0671, pp. 11-12 (La.1/16/96); .
  • McNichols Co. v. Underwood 842 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Terrebonne Fuel and Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Company, 95-0654 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Samour v. Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc. 818 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • Griffin v. BSFI WESTERN E & P, INC. 812 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Company, 95-0654, p. 19 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Estay v. Terminal Stevedores, Inc. 806 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    However, “[ijnherent in the concept of res judicata is the principle that a party had the opportunity to raise the claim in the first adjudication,” Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Graves v. Fields 803 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    As noted in Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc., [ v. Placid Refining Company, 95-0654, 95-0671 (La.1/16/96), ], Louisiana's res judicata law was broadened by the 1990 amendment that is now in line with federal provisions.
  • Brooks v. City of Sunset 801 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    13:4231 1990 Revision Comments, Comment (b); see also Terrebonne Fuel & Lube v. Placid Ref., 95-0654, 95-0671 (La.1/16/96); .
  • Williams v. BET Const., Inc. 818 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In so holding, the court recognized that "the principles of res judicata `are not ironclad, but must be applied to accomplish justice in the light of public policy.'" Jackson , 98-1810 at p. 10, 732 So.2d at 524 , citing Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 95-0654, 95-0671, p. 19 (La.1/16/96), .
  • Thomas v. Janzen 800 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    13:4231; Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Company, 95-0654, 95-0671 (La.01/16/96), .