Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 676 So. 2d 582.
-
Stanley Shreve v. Bio-Lab, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
7/2/96), the supreme court held the existence of all three factors in La.R.S.
-
Irving Caldwell v. West Fraser (South), Inc. and Trumball Insurance Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
7/2/96), the supreme court held the existence of all three factors in La.R.S.
-
Montreal Linn v. Ouachita Parish Police Jury
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
7/2/96), City of Bossier City v. Colvin, 45,278 (La.
- Gilbert Espree, Jr. v. Vanoil Completion Systems La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
- Espree v. Vanoil Completion Sys. 273 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Crockerham v. Weyerhaeuser Holden Wood Products 223 So. 3d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
70 So. 3d 991
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 5/28/03), , citing Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 p. 5-6 (La.7/2/96), .
-
Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
52 So. 3d 280
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 5/28/03), , citing Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 p. 5-6 (La.7/2/96), .
- Ruby L. Hawkins v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
-
Hawkins v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp.
49 So. 3d 1069
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Bynum v. Capital City Press, 95-1395 (La.7/2/96), .
-
City of Bossier City v. Colvin
36 So. 3d 1207
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Bynum v. Capital City Press, 95-1395 (La.7/2/96), ; Lee v. Schumpert, 36,733 *1213 (La.App.
-
Koenig v. Christus Schumpert Health System
12 So. 3d 1037
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 (La.7/2/96), .
-
Adams v. Sysco Food Service of New Orleans
990 So. 2d 34
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395, pp. 5-6 (La.7/2/96), .
-
Gomon v. Melancon
960 So. 2d 982
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395, pp. 5-6 (La.7/2/96), .
-
Butler v. Parish of Jefferson
951 So. 2d 1218
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
[3] Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 (La.7/2/96), (1996).
-
Harper v. CASINO
942 So. 2d 589
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 (La.07/02/96), ; LaCour, supra .
-
Warren v. ACTION OIL RECOVERY
944 So. 2d 615
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395, pp. 5-6 (La.7/2/96), .
-
Taylor v. Hollywood Casino
935 So. 2d 293
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 (La.07/02/96), ; Lee, supra .
-
Allen v. State
934 So. 2d 172
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 p. 5 (La.7/2/96), , interpreted this statute to state that the three factors are not separated, but all are necessary for the prescriptive period to commence.
- Dwight Hickman v. Jim Smith Logging La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
Hickman v. Jim Smith Logging
883 So. 2d 1072
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395, pp. 5-6 (La.7/2/96), *1077 .
-
Nugier Perrodin v. Lafayette Consolidated Government
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
7/2/96), wherein the La.
-
Perrodin v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government
879 So. 2d 385
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
The WCJ issued the following written reasons in support of her judgment: The parties agree that the issue was authoritatively addressed in Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 (La.7/2/96), wherein the La.
-
Scott v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
873 So. 2d 664
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395, pp. 5-6 (La.7/2/96), .
-
Gastinell v. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc.
862 So. 2d 255
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395, pp. 5-6 (La.7/2/96), .
-
Abadie v. MARSIGLIA CONST. CO.
845 So. 2d 564
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 (La.7/2/96)
-
Lee v. Schumpert
836 So. 2d 1214
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Bynum v. Capital City Press, 95-1395 (La.7/2/96), ; Mire v. Ranger Plant Const. Co., 01-2247 (La.App.
-
Mire v. RANGER PLANT CONST. COMPANY, INC.
835 So. 2d 550
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395, p. 6 (La.7/2/96), .
-
Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc.
824 So. 2d 1137
La. 2002
In Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 (La.7/2/96), , we held that the prescriptive period in a workers' compensation case does not begin to run until a disease has manifested itself, the employee has become disabled from working as a result of the disease, and the employee knows or has reasonable grounds to believe the disease is occupationally related.
-
Ortis v. Ortco Contractors, Inc.
809 So. 2d 300
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 (La.7/2/96), .
-
Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum
805 So. 2d 215
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 (La.7/2/96); .
-
Conley v. Georgia Pacific
755 So. 2d 336
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
In Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 (La.7/2/96), , the supreme court was faced with the issue of whether La.
-
McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc.
743 So. 2d 827
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 (La.7/2/96)
-
LaCour v. Hilti Corp.
733 So. 2d 1193
La. 1999
In Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 (La.7/2/96), (1996), this court held that the existence of all three factors is necessary to trigger the running of the six month prescriptive period for claims of disability arising from an occupational disease.
-
Arsenaux v. City of New Orleans
729 So. 2d 1056
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Bynum v. Capitol City Press, Inc., 95-1395 (La.7/2/96); .
-
Davis v. Sheraton Operating Corp.
713 So. 2d 814
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc., 95-1395 (La.7/2/96) p. 5-6
-
Clark v. Mrs. Fields Cookies
707 So. 2d 17
La. 1998
Consequently, these reasons, as well as the fundamental precept that the provisions of the Worker's Compensation Act are to be liberally construed in favor of the claimant, See Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc. 93-1395 (La.7/2/96), ; Daugherty v. Domino's Pizza, 95-1394 (La.5/21/96), , support the conclusion that prescription was suspended during the plaintiff's incarceration.