Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Melon, 660 So. 2d 466.
-
State v. Radacker
722 So. 2d 1093
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
In accordance with the directive in State v. Melon, 95-2209 (La.9/22/95), , this court will consider the assignments of error addressed by defendant's pro se brief, as well as those addressed by defense counsel.
-
State v. Van Winkle
701 So. 2d 1076
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
In accordance with the Supreme Court's directive in State v. Melon, 95-2209 (La.9/26/95), , we have considered defendant's pro se brief and find that it makes several claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
-
State v. Van Winkle
699 So. 2d 77
La. 1997
9/22/95), (“the meaningful access to courts guaranteed by La.
-
State v. Anderson
697 So. 2d 651
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Melon, 95-2209 (La.9/22/95), ; reconsideration denied
- State v. McGough 684 So. 2d 408 La. 1996
-
State v. Schexnayder
685 So. 2d 357
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
In accordance with the directive in State v. Melon, 95-2209 (La.9/22/95), , we now consider the error assigned in that brief.
- Brouillette v. State 680 So. 2d 639 La. 1996
- State v. Haynes 662 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995