Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Silman, 663 So. 2d 27.

195 citing documents.

State Ex Rel. Cb 28 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State ex rel. C.B. 28 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Collins 30 So. 3d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Macon, 06-481, p. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -1286 ; State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Williams 22 So. 3d 867 La. 2009
art. 652; State v. Armstrong, 94-2950, pp. 4-5 (La.4/8/96), ; State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), ; State v. Peters, 94-0283, pp. 8-9 (La.10/17/94), -26 .
State of Louisiana v. Broadus Darneal Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95)
State v. Davis 19 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
Donald F. Carabine v. Oliver Degravelle, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95)
CARABINE v. DeGRAVELLE 11 So. 3d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State of Louisiana v. H.L. J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95)
State v. Johnson 3 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
P. art. 652; State v. Silman, 1995-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Smith 2 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State of Louisiana v. Jimmy James Mack La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95)
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
15:432; State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529, p. 6 (La.1/15/02), ; [ State v. ] Martin [, 00-0489,]at p. 1 [(9/22/00)], 769 So.2d [1168] at 1169; State v. Armstrong, 94-2950, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), ; State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Smith 984 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Dwayne Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95)
State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
15:432; State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529, p. 6 (La.1/15/02), ; Martin at p. 1 , 769 So.2d at 1169 ; State v. Armstrong, 94-2950, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), ; State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), .
State Ex Rel. Jn 984 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State ex rel. J.N. 984 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Frith 985 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. White 982 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
(citing State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), ).
State of Louisiana v. Louis Hayes, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Calvin Joseph Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
11/27/95), the Louisiana Supreme Court said: 9 In reviewing a claim for insufficiency of evidence in an action where an affirmative defense of insanity is raised, this court, applying the standard set forth in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99
State v. Coleman 976 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
In State v. Silman, 95-154, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court said: In reviewing a claim for insufficiency of evidence in an action where an affirmative defense of insanity is raised, this court, applying the standard set forth in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Boyd 972 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. MacOn 957 So. 2d 1280 La. 2007
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Marshall 943 So. 2d 362 La. 2006
State v. Casey, 99-0023 (La.1/26/00), ; State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95, ); State v. Gilliam, 36,118 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Calvin Joseph Celestine, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Hargrave 926 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Silman, 95-154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Wiley 914 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95, ); State v. Gilliam, 36,118 (La.App.
State v. McCray 908 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
P. art. 652; State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), ; State v. Odom, 33,340 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Hypolite La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Hypolite 903 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Rubin 899 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
State of Louisiana v. Jordie Kenry Rubin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Williams 901 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Garner 890 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Kibbe 887 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[8] State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Myles 887 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Housley 884 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Updite 877 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), ; State v. Gilliam, 36,118 (La.App.
State v. Walker 870 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), ; State v. Gilliam, 36,118 (La.App.
State v. Lee 868 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), ; State v. Gilliam, 36,118 (La.App.
State v. Roca 866 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
15:432 [9] ; State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529, p. 6 (La.1/15/02), ; Martin at p. 1 , 769 So.2d at 1169 ; State v. Armstrong, 94-2950, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), ; State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Lyles 858 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Pierre 854 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Citing State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), , Defendant argues whereas an affirmative defense of insanity was raised, the standard of review for sufficiency of the evidence is that this court must "determine whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, any rational fact finder, viewing the evidence most favorable to the prosecution, could conclude, be
State v. Jackson 846 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Gleason 836 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Reese, 34,275 (La.App.2d Cir.12/20/00), ; State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Qutoum 839 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .