Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Silman, 663 So. 2d 27.
-
State v. Stacker
836 So. 2d 601
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Ruffin
836 So. 2d 625
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[5] State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Robinson
831 So. 2d 460
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Wade
832 So. 2d 977
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Parfait
831 So. 2d 360
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Steele
829 So. 2d 541
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Willis
823 So. 2d 1072
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), ; State v. Bosley, supra .
-
State v. Sopczak
823 So. 2d 978
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
15:432; State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), ; State v. Washington, 00-301, p. 5 (La.App.
-
State v. Rivers
817 So. 2d 216
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Currie
812 So. 2d 128
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
The Louisiana Supreme Court was faced with the issue of insanity at the time of the offense in State v. Silman, 95 0154 (La.11/27/95), , and set forth the applicable law as follows: In Louisiana, a legal presumption exists that a defendant is sane at the time of the offenses.
-
State v. Williams
804 So. 2d 932
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
14:14; State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Hayes
806 So. 2d 816
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Saylor
802 So. 2d 937
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
[15] State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Sarrio
803 So. 2d 212
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Gaal
800 So. 2d 938
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Calvin
781 So. 2d 827
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Upchurch
783 So. 2d 398
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Hampton
782 So. 2d 1045
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Morgan
779 So. 2d 17
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
98-1407 at pp. 26-27, 745 So.2d at 181 , quoting State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Reese
774 So. 2d 1164
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Armstrong, 94-2950 (La.4/8/96), ; State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), ; State v. Odom, 33,340 (La.App.
-
State v. Payne
777 So. 2d 555
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Crowell
773 So. 2d 871
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Handy
772 So. 2d 931
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. McGrew
769 So. 2d 782
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Silman, 95 0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Palermo
765 So. 2d 1155
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Roussel
767 So. 2d 811
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Odom
760 So. 2d 576
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
art. 652; State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Brooks
755 So. 2d 311
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Silman, 95-154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95); .
-
State v. Gipson
747 So. 2d 187
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Perez
745 So. 2d 166
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
The Louisiana Supreme Court was faced with the issue of insanity at the time of the offense in State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), , and set forth the applicable law as follows: In Louisiana, a legal presumption exists that a defendant is sane at the time of the offenses.
-
State v. Lewis
736 So. 2d 1004
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
- State v. Hayden 707 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
-
State v. McIntyre
708 So. 2d 1071
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
- State v. Allen 707 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
- State v. Keys 694 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
-
State v. Williams
693 So. 2d 249
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Silman, 95-0154 p. 12, (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Ledet
692 So. 2d 1309
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
- State v. Wade 693 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
-
State v. Ingram
688 So. 2d 657
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), ; (La.App.
-
State v. Prince
688 So. 2d 643
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Whitehead
711 So. 2d 275
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
-
State v. Thames
681 So. 2d 480
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), .
- State v. Horne 679 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
-
State v. Armstrong
671 So. 2d 307
La. 1996
("Criminal responsibility is not negated by the mere existence of a mental disease or defect.
-
State v. Henderson
672 So. 2d 1085
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
11/27/95), ; State v. Allen, 94-1895, p. 7 (La.App.