Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Silman, 663 So. 2d 27.

195 citing documents.

  • State v. Stacker 836 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Ruffin 836 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [5] State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Robinson 831 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Wade 832 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Parfait 831 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Steele 829 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Willis 823 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), ; State v. Bosley, supra .
  • State v. Sopczak 823 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    15:432; State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), ; State v. Washington, 00-301, p. 5 (La.App.
  • State v. Rivers 817 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Currie 812 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    The Louisiana Supreme Court was faced with the issue of insanity at the time of the offense in State v. Silman, 95 0154 (La.11/27/95), , and set forth the applicable law as follows: In Louisiana, a legal presumption exists that a defendant is sane at the time of the offenses.
  • State v. Williams 804 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    14:14; State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Hayes 806 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Saylor 802 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    [15] State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Sarrio 803 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Gaal 800 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Calvin 781 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Upchurch 783 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Hampton 782 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Morgan 779 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    98-1407 at pp. 26-27, 745 So.2d at 181 , quoting State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Reese 774 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Armstrong, 94-2950 (La.4/8/96), ; State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), ; State v. Odom, 33,340 (La.App.
  • State v. Payne 777 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Crowell 773 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Handy 772 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. McGrew 769 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Silman, 95 0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Roussel 767 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Odom 760 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    art. 652; State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Brooks 755 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    State v. Silman, 95-154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95); .
  • State v. Gipson 747 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Perez 745 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    The Louisiana Supreme Court was faced with the issue of insanity at the time of the offense in State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), , and set forth the applicable law as follows: In Louisiana, a legal presumption exists that a defendant is sane at the time of the offenses.
  • State v. Lewis 736 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Hayden 707 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. McIntyre 708 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Allen 707 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Keys 694 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Williams 693 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 p. 12, (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Ledet 692 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Wade 693 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Ingram 688 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 12 (La.11/27/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Prince 688 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Whitehead 711 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Thames 681 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    State v. Silman, 95-0154, p. 7 (La.11/27/95), .
  • State v. Horne 679 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Armstrong 671 So. 2d 307 La. 1996
    ("Criminal responsibility is not negated by the mere existence of a mental disease or defect.
  • State v. Henderson 672 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    11/27/95), ; State v. Allen, 94-1895, p. 7 (La.App.