95-K-1331 Precedential Processed

State v. Callahan

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed March 29, 1996 · 671 So. 2d 903

Cited by

State of Louisiana v. Desmond Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Akeeley Keshawn Blade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State v. Fleming 219 So. 3d 499 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Spencer 167 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Cox 85 So. 3d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Sampognaro 39 So. 3d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Regis 25 So. 3d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Roy J. Chapman, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Shaw 15 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Lawson 997 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Latin 960 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Everett 916 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005

all 32 citing documents »

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

State v. Jaye 383 So. 2d 1261
State v. Broussard 217 La. 90

Opinion text

671 So.2d 903 (1996) STATE of Louisiana v. William Matthew CALLAHAN. No. 95-K-1331. Supreme Court of Louisiana. March 29, 1996. PER CURIAM. The application is granted in part. Relator was convicted of attempted possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and was sentenced to two and one-half years imprisonment, which the trial court noted was the statutory minimum sentence for that crime. The sentencing range for a conviction of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute is five to thirty years. When the conviction is for attempt, La.Rev.Stat. 14:27D(3) provides: D. Whoever attempts to commit any crime shall be punished as follows: . . . . . (3) In all other cases he shall be fined or imprisoned or both, in the same manner as for the offense attempted; such fine or imprisonment shall not exceed one-half of the largest fine, or one-half of the longest term of imprisonment prescribed for the offense so attempted, or both. (emphasis added). La.Rev.Stat. 14:27D(3) by its terms provides only a maximum sentence for a conviction of attempting to commit a crime. There is no express statutory minimum sentence for being convicted of an attempt, and principles of lenity require that the statute be strictly construed. State v. Jaye, 383 So.2d 1261 (La.1980); State v. Broussard, 217 La. 90 , 46 So.2d 48 (1950). Accordingly, relator's sentence is vacated, and this case is remanded to the district court for resentencing. In all other respects, the application is denied. *904 MARCUS, J., dissents and assigns reasons. La.R.S. 14:27 D(3) provides that "[i]n all cases he shall be ... imprisoned ... in the same manner as for the offense attempted." [Emphasis added.] In my opinion, "in the same manner" refers to the minimum sentence requirement for the offense attempted. The second sentence provides that imprisonment shall not exceed one-half of the longest term of imprisonment for the offense attempted. This refers to the maximum sentence for the offense attempted. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.