Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 666 So. 2d 1092.

22 citing documents.

State v. Julian 785 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 8/23/95) , , writs denied 95-2331, 95-3044 (La.2/2/96), , 1105, this court stated: The determination of probable cause, although requiring something more than bare suspicion, does not require evidence sufficient to support a conviction.
State v. Lewis 782 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 8/23/95) , , writ denied, State v. Johnson, 95-2331 (La.2/2/96), , and State v. Dibartolo, 95-3044 (La.2/2/96), .
State v. Francois 778 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 8/23/95), , writs denied, 95-2331 (La.2/2/96), and 95-3044 (La.2/2/96), , this court found the seizure of a rock of crack cocaine justified under the “plain feel” exception based upon the officer’s testimony that when he felt the rock-like substance during the pat-down frisk, he immediately believed the substance to be crack cocaine.
State v. Broussard 769 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
95-2331 (La.2/2/96); , *1260 and State v. Dibartolo, 95-3044 (La.2/2/96); .
State v. Russell 764 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
App. 4 Cir. 8/23/95), , writ denied, 95-2331 (La.2/2/96), and writ denied by State v. Dibartolo, 95-3044 (La.2/2/96), ; State v. Finne, 92-2555 (La.App.
State v. Tyler 749 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 8/23/95) , , writs denied, 95-2331, , 95-3044 (La.2/2/96), , this Court held that police had reasonable suspicion to believe the defendant was engaged in criminal activity where the defendant was in a high drug trafficking area at 1:00 a.m.; he turned and walked away at the sight of police; and he was in the company of an individual who d
State v. Samuel 746 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
95-2331 (La.2/2/96); , and writ den.
State v. Littles 742 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 8/23/95) , , writs denied, 95-2331 (La.2/2/96), , and 95-3044 (La.2/2/96), , this Court held that an officer's seizure of a rock of crack cocaine was justified under the "plain feel" exception.
State v. Brown 733 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 95-2331 (La.2/2/96), , and State v. Dibartolo, 95-3044 (La.2/2/96), .
State v. Walker 735 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4th Cir. 8/23/95), , writ denied, State v. DiBartolo, 94-1170 (La.App.
Melder v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 731 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 8/23/95), , 946 writs denied, 95-2331, 95-3044 (La.2/2/96), , 1105.
State v. Dappemont 734 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4th Cir.8/23/95), , writ denied, State v. Johnson, 95-2331 (La.2/2/96), , and State v. Dibartolo, 95-3044 (La.2/2/96), , this court discussed the "plain feel" doctrine as set forth in Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 , 113 S.Ct.
State v. Watkins 726 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
4th Cir.8/23/95), , writ denied State v. Johnson, 95-2331 (La.2/2/96), , and *997 State v. Dibartolo, 95-3044 (La.2/2/96), .
State v. Bradford 729 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
4 Cir. 8/23/95) , , writ denied, 95-2331 (La.2/2/96), and State v. Dibartolo, 95-3044 (La.2/2/96), .
State v. Blue 705 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Johnson, 95-2331 (La.2/2/96), , and State v. Dibartolo, 95-3044 (La.2/2/96), .
State v. Miller 703 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
4 Cir. 8/23/95) , writ denied, State v. Johnson, 95-2331 (La.2/2/96), , and State v. Dibartolo, 95-3044 (La.2/2/96), .
State v. Hill 700 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Johnson, 95-2331 (La.2/2/96), , and State v. Dibartolo, 95-3044 (La.2/2/96), .
State v. Anderson 696 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
4 Cir. 8/23/95) , , writs denied 95-2331 (La.2/2/96), and 95-3044 (La.2/2/96), .
State v. Cole 688 So. 2d 533 La. 1997
2/2/96), , within thirty days.
State v. Jackson 684 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
4 Cir. 8/23/95); , writs denied, 95-2331 (La.2/2/96); and 95-3044 (La.2/2/96); .
State v. Lavigne 675 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
2/2/96); and 95-3044 (La.
State v. Mangrum 675 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
2/2/96), ; and 95-3044 (La.