Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cook, 674 So. 2d 957.

1211 citing documents.

  • State v. Coco 723 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    In reviewing a sentence, we must be mindful that “[t]he only relevant question on review, however, [is] “whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’” State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); .
  • State v. Price 721 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    In State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
  • State v. Anderson 721 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    However, in State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , the Louisiana Supreme Court emphasized that the only relevant question on review of a sentence is whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, and not whether another sentence might be more appropriate.
  • State v. Abdullah 722 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); ; *25
  • State v. Thomas 719 So. 2d 49 La. 1998
    On appellate review of sentence, the relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. McDowell 720 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    As stated by the supreme court in State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State v. Hardaway 715 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    State v. Cook, 95-2784, pp. 2-3 (La.5/31/96); -959 .
  • State v. Hammond 704 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    The standard set forth in State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , although not enunciating new law, expressly constrains the reviewing court from substituting its judgment—even if better supported by the record (or lack thereof)—for that of the trial court.
  • State v. Soraparu 703 So. 2d 608 La. 1997
  • State v. Gibson 693 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    The supreme court recently reversed this court's vacation of a nine-year sentence for vehicular homicide and reinstated the sentence in State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
  • State v. Hebert 688 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.05/31/96), ; State v. Smith, 93-0402 (La.07/05/94), (on rehearing).