Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cook, 674 So. 2d 957.

1211 citing documents.

State v. Bell 796 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
State v. Coston 800 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), ce rt.
State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence | ?,?might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
State v. Camese 791 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
However, in State v. Soraparu, 97-1027, p. 1 (La.1997), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" *177 State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
State v. Hymes 787 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
In State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
State v. Raffray 787 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); .
State v. Allen 794 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
State v. PM 786 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
In State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); ; cert.
State v. P.M. 786 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); ; cert, denied, 96-6329 (12/16/96); 519 U.S. 1043 , 117 S.Ct.
State v. Harris 787 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
State v. Boudreaux 782 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
State v. Robichaux 788 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
State v. Algere 780 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: |7On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
State v. Rodriguez 781 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: *649 On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
State v. Barling 779 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State *1043 v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
State v. Jones 778 So. 2d 1131 La. 2001
State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), .
State v. Richard 779 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
[21] State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
State v. McBride 776 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
5/31/96), , I am of the opinion that the trial court should be affirmed.
State v. Martin 788 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
State v. McBride 773 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
We also note State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 2 (La.5/31/96); -59 , cert.
State v. Freeman 770 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
State v. Hall 775 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
State v. Clements 774 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 6/2/99) ; : In State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
State v. Schmidt 771 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
However, in State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
State v. Guy 775 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
State v. Alford 765 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
State v. Wommack 770 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
See also State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
State v. Dank 764 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
State v. Monette 758 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
State v. Barrett 756 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , U.S. cert.
STATE of Louisiana v. MORRISON 758 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In reviewing a sentence, we must be mindful that “[t]he only relevant question on review, however, [is] ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96); , 959
State v. Ignot 755 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
State v. Morrison 758 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
In reviewing a sentence, we must be mindful that "[t]he only relevant question on review, however, [is] `whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96); , 959
State v. Villarreal 759 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
3rd Cir. 10/18/95), , reversed on other grounds, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
State v. Rodriguez 753 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
App. 4 Cir. 9/8/99), .9 In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court cited State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), , 959 and held: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" Defendant was convicted on three counts of obscenity, in violation of La.
State v. Texada 756 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
[10] State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
State v. Dubroc 755 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
State v. Myers 753 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
State v. Trahan 752 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
The Louisiana Supreme Court considered whether a nine-year sentence was excessive in State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert denied, 519 U.S. 1043 , 117 S.Ct.
State v. Jordan 747 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); cert.
State v. Blackmon 748 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); .
State v. Valrie 749 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
In State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert.
State v. Trepagnier 744 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
State v. Gray 747 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), .
State v. Jones 742 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96); , cert denied, 96-6329 (12/16/96); 519 U.S. 1043 , 117 S.Ct.
State v. Garner 741 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
In State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
State v. Skaggs 734 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
See 3 State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
State v. Lisotta 726 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.