Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Reed, 653 So. 2d 1176.

458 citing documents.

State v. Burton 55 So. 3d 115 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 1996-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 1995-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; (La.App.
State v. Jones 51 So. 3d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir.1990), was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per cu-riam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Turner 47 So. 3d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Wise 42 So. 3d 1137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
State v. Reed 41 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
See Anders v. California, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; *660 State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; State v. Benjamin, supra.
State v. Fowler 40 So. 3d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
State v. Autin 40 So. 3d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir.1990), sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), adopted for use by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
State v. Yanes 40 So. 3d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Ervin 33 So. 3d 986 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
State v. England 38 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. England 38 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Haynes 34 So. 3d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Chester 31 So. 3d 1116 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Allemand 30 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
His brief must contain “ ‘a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.’ ” Jyles , 96-2669 at 3, 704 So.2d at 242 , quoting State v. Mouton, 95-0981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), (per cu-riam).
State v. Johnson 28 So. 3d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir.1990), sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), adopted for use by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
State v. Campbell 28 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
NOTES [1] The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Horton 28 So. 3d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by die Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Magana 27 So. 3d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Dewayne Shaun Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Lewis 25 So. 3d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
|sThe Louisiana Supreme Court approved this analysis in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), .
State v. McGee 24 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Kirkpatrick 24 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
See Anders v. California, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; State v. Benjamin, supra.
State v. Payne 16 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
refore, we find that Counsel conducted a detailed and thorough review of the record and complied with State v. Jyles, as Counsel’s brief set forth “a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (quoting State v. Mouton, 95-0981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), ); see also State v. Allen, 2008-0533, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Bridgewater 11 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Ronquille 16 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir.1990), sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), adopted for use by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
State v. Hill 15 So. 3d 1038 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Hill 15 So. 3d 1042 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. McQuarters 8 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
See Anders v. California, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; *824 State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
State v. Gautreau 5 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4/28/95), , 1177 (per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court sanctioned the procedures outlined in Benjamin for use by the appellate courts of Louisiana.
State v. Smith 9 So. 3d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mention, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Delaney 6 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
State v. Riviere 9 So. 3d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 1990), and sanctioned in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam ), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
State v. Jarrow 9 So. 3d 905 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 .The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Rainey 8 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Moution, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), , 1177 (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Scott 8 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mou ton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), , 1177 (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Jones 999 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), , and moved to withdraw as attorney of record.
State v. Walker 8 So. 3d 17 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Dauzat 8 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. Mitchell 7 So. 3d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
State v. DEROUEN 999 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; (La.
State v. Allen 999 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (quoting State v. Mouton, 95-0981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), ).
State v. HARMASON 996 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4/28/95), , 1177 (per curiam), (La.
State v. Winchester 994 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4/28/95), , 1177 (per curiam), (La.
State v. Jones 999 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), , and moved to withdraw as attorney of record.
State v. Tyler 996 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; *435 State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
State v. Thomas 986 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
State v. Roberson 986 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 1996-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, XXXX-XXXX (La.04/28/95), ; (La.App.
State v. Jenkins 986 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
State v. Augustine 987 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Jyles, supra, at 242 (quoting State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ).
State v. Thomas 984 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
His or her brief must contain "`a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.'" Jyles , 96-2669 at p. 3, 704 So.2d at 242 (quoting State v. Mouton, 95-0981, p. 1 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam)).