DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Reed, 653 So. 2d 1176.

458 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jarvis Joseph Joubert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Hubbard 103 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    95-0981 (La.4/28/95), , 1177 (per curiam).
  • State v. Ott 102 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Moution, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95); , 1177 (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State v. Miller 102 So. 3d 956 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State v. Fifi 102 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    ucted a detailed and thorough review of the record and adequately complied with Anders and State v. Jyles, by setting forth in the appellate brief “a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (quoting State v. Mouton, 95-0981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), ).
  • State v. Fifi 102 So. 3d 963 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    ucted a detailed and thorough review of the record and adequately complied with Anders and State v. Jyles, by setting forth in the appellate brief “a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (quoting State v. Mouton, 95-0981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), ).
  • State v. Bazile 106 So. 3d 560 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Pee 107 So. 3d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Foster 105 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Finley 105 So. 3d 732 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    See Anders v. California, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; and State v. Benjamin, supra.
  • State v. Howard 91 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert J. Lebleu La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. LeBleu 93 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In State v. Mouton, 95-981 (La.4/28/95), , (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 91 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State v. Campbell 86 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Bradham 87 So. 3d 200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , writ denied, 1999-3018 (La.03/31/00), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.04/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 87 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Moutan, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 88 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    The procedure set Forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State v. Mayon 88 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State v. Wilson 79 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Thomas 81 So. 3d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State v. Fullilove 81 So. 3d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State v. Otkins 81 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Para 81 So. 3d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    cted a detailed and thorough review of the record and adequately complied with An-ders and State v. Jyles, by setting forth in the appellate brief “a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (quoting State v. Mouton, 95-0981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Tyrel O. Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Fleming 80 So. 3d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    The procedure set forth in Beniamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State v. Dickerson 80 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 77 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    cted a detailed and thorough review of the record and adequately complied with An-ders and State v. Jyles, by setting forth in the appellate brief “a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (quoting State v. Mouton, 95-0981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), ).
  • State v. Wilson 77 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95); (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State v. Bush 77 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    The brief also contains “a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” Jyles, supra, citing State v. Mouton, 95-0981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam).
  • State v. Williams 72 So. 3d 966 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Elzier 72 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Boyd 72 So. 3d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Junior 70 So. 3d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    find that Counsel conducted a detailed and thorough review of the record and complied with Anders and State v. Jyles, as Counsel’s brief set forth “a detailed and reviewable assessment for both the defendant and the appellate court of whether the appeal is worth pursuing in the first place.” State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), (quoting State v. Mouton, 95-0981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), ).
  • State v. Craig 66 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir.1990), sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), adopted for use by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 67 So. 3d 618 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95); (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State v. Stewart 65 So. 3d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State v. Vargas 66 So. 3d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State v. Mitchell 64 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State v. Mitchell 64 So. 3d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State v. Landers 63 So. 3d 1079 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Junior 62 So. 3d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 .The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Pedro Jose Reloba La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Reloba 56 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    at 242 (quoting State v. Mouton, 95-981, p. 2 (La.4/28/95), ).
  • State v. Jenkins 57 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; State v. Benjamin, supra.
  • State v. Eason 57 So. 3d 403 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 60 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir.1990), sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-981 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), adopted for use by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929 (La.App.
  • State v. Wilson 59 So. 3d 1259 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mouton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
  • State v. Cooper 50 So. 3d 115 La. 2010
    State v. Reed, 1995-0648 (La.4/28/95), .
  • State v. Delatte 54 So. 3d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    The procedure set forth in Benjamin for compliance with Anders was sanctioned by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Mou *109 ton, 95-0981, pp. 1-2 (La.4/28/95), (per curiam), and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, 95-929, pp. 3-4 (La.App.